Mass stabbing at Boston mall; Breaking....

Dishonest people cannot answer the question honestly.


Allow me to answer you question.....

Essentially, you have asked this question...

Yes or no.....did you stop beating your wife?

By putting your question the way you did you require a yes, no answer to a question that needs an actual answer....one that can't be covered in a simple yes, no answer.....but of course, as an anti gun lefty....that was the intent...no matter the answer you win...

This is the correct way to ask your question...

Lonelaugher.....we have created Gun Free zones through our support of those laws that ban normal, law abiding people from bringing their guns into public buildings designated as gun free zones....

So...having made sure that normal gun owners have no access to guns for their own defense....if a criminal brings a gun into a gun free zone...breaking the law, with the intent to commit mass murder against people who cannot stop him...... would you prefer he had a gun or a knife....

Given that question...then the answer would be...you would want him to have a knife.

If, however, you anti gun morons hadn't created every public space into a gun free zone.....then the answer would be it wouldn't matter so much, as long as there were normal people at the location who could also carry guns...in fact....as we know from actual mass shooters who have left notes or been interrogated by police.....if those places were not gun free zones....they would not go there....thus saving more lives than were killed by the knifer....

So the answer would really be....get rid of the gun free zone and you won't have to decide wether it is better if he has a gun or a knife since they will not go there, and even if they do...they can be stopped.

How do we know this about gun free zones....because we actually can compare gun free zone shootings to criminals who goof up and attack places that aren't gun free...

I'll show you...

Notice the death toll in gun free zones which you support.... vs. non gun free zones......

Some details to help you make your guess....

Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia ( 6 dead, 4 wounded)

Charleston church shooting - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia ( 9 dead)

vs.

Deputies Osceola pastor shot church janitor in self-defense ( 0 dead)

6 Shot At New Life Church Gunman 2 Churchgoers Dead - 7NEWS Denver TheDenverChannel.com ( 2 dead, 3 wounded)

Remember This SC Concealed Carrier Stops Mass Shooting During Church Service. No Casualties. ( 0 dead)
**********
No guns: 15 dead

Sikh temple ( 6 dead, 4 wounded)

Charleston ( 9 dead)


Parishioners with guns: 2 dead

Osceola ( 0 dead )

New life ( 2 dead, 3 wounded)

South Carolina shotgun guy ( 0 dead)


Temple massacre has some Sikhs mulling gun ownership

The president of the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin had only a butter knife on hand, which he used to fight the gunman. He was killed, but his heroic actions were credited for slowing the shooter. Guns were not allowed in the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin.

“No guns [were] allowed in the temple,” Kulbir Singh, an attendee of the Sikh Temple of Wisconsin, told FoxNews.com. “Everyone knows that it’s not allowed, anywhere in the temple.”
 
Last edited:
Soooooo...looking at gun free zone shootings....which you support....lonelaugher

15 dead, 4 wounded.

And non- gun free zones...

2 dead, 3 wounded...

a non gun free zone where a shooter shows up has the kill rate the same as the knifer.......2 dead...3 wounded....but the knife guy wounded 4 ...right?

And the gun free zone where only the shooter has a gun...

15 dead.....

So in answer to your question LoneLaugher....I would rather both of us had a gun......rather than only the shooter have a gun.......

does that help.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top