Matt Damon, gun using action star...wants Australian gun confiscation in U.S.

yes......the man who is surrounded by heavily armed security...wants all Gus in the U.S. Confiscated.....

Action Star Matt Damon Wants Australian-Style Gun Ban in U.S.

According to Stuff, Damon said, “You guys did it here in one fell swoop and I wish that could happen in my country, but it’s such a personal issue for people that we cannot talk about it sen
You seem to have a problem distinguishing between real life and fiction.


The O/P probably thinks Charlton Heston was really Judah Ben Hur in real life, too.
 
what does use by an actor in movies have to do with real life gun use?

Let's talk about that.....

Mr. Damon will be raking in money for his employer in the coming weeks as the star of a movie where a CIVILIAN, who used to work for the Government uses firearms. The character, without those guns, could not complete the activities he is shown performing. In fact, if Mr Demon's preferred policies were in place, Jason Bourne would have no chance against his adversaries.

Liam Neeson is another actor of the same ilk.

These individuals passively, if not actively promote the gun culture through their work product, yet they would deny their viewers the same rights their characters promote. That's pretty hypocritical in my mind.

nah...sorry. what one plays with in a movie scene is not relevant to a discussion of what controls we need on who can purchase guns and what the limits of the types of guns available are appropriate.


It is when he surrounds himself with guys with guns to protect him and his family.....then wants to keep us from protecting our families on our own........

Horseshit. If you need an automatic weapon that will most likely blow out the window of your neighbor's house across the street before it hits a burglar in your house, then you really are helpless and the burglar should prevail.

Here's what the founding fathers want you to have, according to law, in the event of tyrannous acts committed by your government:

5301490-antique-musket-in-white-background-Stock-Photo-pistol-musket.jpg
 
The Pacific Palisades. The gated private community where Matt Damon lives.

the_enclave_pacific_palisades_720.jpg


Gated and and guarded by armed guards.

I mean they need to protect his little head. I mean he is so important to our country after all. Just ask them.

12-575349_1_1.0.jpg


Matt Damons house. I think there is another pool on the other side. They obviously need to protect his little head don't they?

I am pretty sure he is saying if you want protection like he gets, then you need to as successful as he is so you too can afford a gated community with a big private home guarded by armed guards.

I mean if only, right?

He needs to make another Bourne movie that goes away from the theme of the Ludlum novels and make sure white right wing America is the antagonist. Unlike what Robert Ludlum wrote in his Bourne novels.

Hollywood folks. Beware.


He did make a film that is more in line with his own political beliefs: "Promised Land"
And his digs aren't nearly as nice as the ultra-secured, heavily guarded Mar-a-Lago, owned by a hypocrite who kisses NRA ass just like you.
 
The Pacific Palisades. The gated private community where Matt Damon lives.

the_enclave_pacific_palisades_720.jpg


Gated and and guarded by armed guards.

I mean they need to protect his little head. I mean he is so important to our country after all. Just ask them.

12-575349_1_1.0.jpg


Matt Damons house. I think there is another pool on the other side. They obviously need to protect his little head don't they?

I am pretty sure he is saying if you want protection like he gets, then you need to as successful as he is so you too can afford a gated community with a big private home guarded by armed guards.

I mean if only, right?

He needs to make another Bourne movie that goes away from the theme of the Ludlum novels and make sure white right wing America is the antagonist. Unlike what Robert Ludlum wrote in his Bourne novels.

Hollywood folks. Beware.


He did make a film that is more in line with his own political beliefs: "Promised Land"
And his digs aren't nearly as nice as the ultra-secured, heavily guarded Mar-a-Lago, owned by a hypocrite who kisses NRA ass just like you.


Yes.........his home is protected by the best that his movies, where he glamorized guns, with the millions of dollars in salary can buy.......if his family is threatened...he will have heavily armed guys guarding them 24/7 and they won't be armed with muskets......
 
what does use by an actor in movies have to do with real life gun use?

Let's talk about that.....

Mr. Damon will be raking in money for his employer in the coming weeks as the star of a movie where a CIVILIAN, who used to work for the Government uses firearms. The character, without those guns, could not complete the activities he is shown performing. In fact, if Mr Demon's preferred policies were in place, Jason Bourne would have no chance against his adversaries.

Liam Neeson is another actor of the same ilk.

These individuals passively, if not actively promote the gun culture through their work product, yet they would deny their viewers the same rights their characters promote. That's pretty hypocritical in my mind.

nah...sorry. what one plays with in a movie scene is not relevant to a discussion of what controls we need on who can purchase guns and what the limits of the types of guns available are appropriate.


It is when he surrounds himself with guys with guns to protect him and his family.....then wants to keep us from protecting our families on our own........

playing a part in a movie isn't "surrounding himself with guns".

i know you live in a fantasy world but you should be able to distinguish movies from real life.


Twit....he has paid security, men with guns who protect him and his family...what about that do you not understand......try to approach matt damon and see who steps in your way....

what the thread is about is him using guns in movies.... not your wacko agenda.

learn to read.
 
Let's talk about that.....

Mr. Damon will be raking in money for his employer in the coming weeks as the star of a movie where a CIVILIAN, who used to work for the Government uses firearms. The character, without those guns, could not complete the activities he is shown performing. In fact, if Mr Demon's preferred policies were in place, Jason Bourne would have no chance against his adversaries.

Liam Neeson is another actor of the same ilk.

These individuals passively, if not actively promote the gun culture through their work product, yet they would deny their viewers the same rights their characters promote. That's pretty hypocritical in my mind.

nah...sorry. what one plays with in a movie scene is not relevant to a discussion of what controls we need on who can purchase guns and what the limits of the types of guns available are appropriate.


It is when he surrounds himself with guys with guns to protect him and his family.....then wants to keep us from protecting our families on our own........

playing a part in a movie isn't "surrounding himself with guns".

i know you live in a fantasy world but you should be able to distinguish movies from real life.


Twit....he has paid security, men with guns who protect him and his family...what about that do you not understand......try to approach matt damon and see who steps in your way....

what the thread is about is him using guns in movies.... not your wacko agenda.

learn to read.


Moron...this is about him using guns in movies...and using guns to protect his own family, then wanting everyone elses guns confiscated as they did in Australia......he is a moron.......guns are okay as long as someone else uses them to protect his family, and when he uses them to make millions of dollars....but they are not okay when a regular citizen uses it to stop a rape, robbery or murder...those people are just supposed to submit to the attacker......
 
what does use by an actor in movies have to do with real life gun use?

Let's talk about that.....

Mr. Damon will be raking in money for his employer in the coming weeks as the star of a movie where a CIVILIAN, who used to work for the Government uses firearms. The character, without those guns, could not complete the activities he is shown performing. In fact, if Mr Demon's preferred policies were in place, Jason Bourne would have no chance against his adversaries.

Liam Neeson is another actor of the same ilk.

These individuals passively, if not actively promote the gun culture through their work product, yet they would deny their viewers the same rights their characters promote. That's pretty hypocritical in my mind.

nah...sorry. what one plays with in a movie scene is not relevant to a discussion of what controls we need on who can purchase guns and what the limits of the types of guns available are appropriate.


It is when he surrounds himself with guys with guns to protect him and his family.....then wants to keep us from protecting our families on our own........

Horseshit. If you need an automatic weapon that will most likely blow out the window of your neighbor's house across the street before it hits a burglar in your house, then you really are helpless and the burglar should prevail.

Here's what the founding fathers want you to have, according to law, in the event of tyrannous acts committed by your government:

5301490-antique-musket-in-white-background-Stock-Photo-pistol-musket.jpg
quill-pen-800.jpg
 
yes......the man who is surrounded by heavily armed security...wants all Gus in the U.S. Confiscated.....

Action Star Matt Damon Wants Australian-Style Gun Ban in U.S.

According to Stuff, Damon said, “You guys did it here in one fell swoop and I wish that could happen in my country, but it’s such a personal issue for people that we cannot talk about it sen

Maybe Matt needs to go to a country more to his liking
How original. :rolleyes:

Trump should deport him to Australia

He belongs on Mars.
 
Perhaps the 70-80 million private gun owners need to boycott all future Matt Damon movies.
 
I tell you what I will listen to any gun ban, restrictions, whatever you want to call it on the condition that all of those who have their own armed private security for their protection politicians, Holloywood actors the rich whoever are willing to give it up and take the same risk they want the rest of us to take.
 

Forum List

Back
Top