Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

[Sunshine]

I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

The public schools get money for every student in attendance. When they take their children out of those schools, the schools do not get that allowance. Money that goes to schools is based on enrollment. If they want the schools better, then they should send their children there for funding and so their superior behavior and morals will rub off on the others. ~snicker~

 

[Oddball]

I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

No...You wouldn't.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Here we have yet another leer-jet, limousine Hollywood liberal screaming one thing but doing something else. "Do as I say, not as I do". Proving once again, "Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist".

Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

If I agree with gay marriage does that mean I have to fuck a guys ass?

Don't be stupid

 

[Edgetho]

There's nothing inconsistent about it.

libtard elites also want Capitalism for themselves and socialism for everybody else.

Nothing inconsistent there either

The planet you live on must be a fascinating place.

 

[ClosedCaption]

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

 

[asterism]

Yes, and my state has charter schools for failing districts.

If you support having the option for others, you aren't a hypocrite.

I see nothing in Obama's speeches or policies that show he supports anything but public school with the current ineffective bureaucracy, while providing something special to his own wealthy children.

That's the hypocritical part. It's the same as his healthcare policy, which he doesn't think is good enough for him or his staff but it's just fine for the rest of us.

 

[asterism]

I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

The public schools get money for every student in attendance. When they take their children out of those schools, the schools do not get that allowance. Money that goes to schools is based on enrollment. If they want the schools better, then they should send their children there for funding and so their superior behavior and morals will rub off on the others. ~snicker~

That's only true for the half of funds given to school from the federal government. The local funding is not based on a per-student allocation and people with kids in private schools still pay property tax for public schools.

 

[asterism]

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Not true. I haven't insulted anyone.

 

[konradv]

The kicker is when obama got into office he did away with charter schools in washington. Then had to reinstate it after the out cry of the minorities. Obama wanted to keep his on kind uneducated, wonder why.

Nothing racist here, right? "O(w)n kind"(sic)?!?! If the Republicans really want to shake the tag, people are going to have to realize there's only one kind, human beings. Can't take the "Obama is a racist" charge seriously, when we still have to put up with this kind of thinking.

Lol, what did you want me to say? "*******"?

I wanted you to recognize your own racism. It's been a ploy on the right to recognize everyone else's, but not their own.

 

[konradv]

I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

The public schools get money for every student in attendance. When they take their children out of those schools, the schools do not get that allowance. Money that goes to schools is based on enrollment. If they want the schools better, then they should send their children there for funding and so their superior behavior and morals will rub off on the others. ~snicker~

Now who's telling someone what they should do and how they should act. Doesn't irony mean anything to RWers?

 

[Oddball]

I just don't see hypocrisy in trying to make public schools better, but at the same time giving your kid every advantage you can afford.

The public schools get money for every student in attendance. When they take their children out of those schools, the schools do not get that allowance. Money that goes to schools is based on enrollment. If they want the schools better, then they should send their children there for funding and so their superior behavior and morals will rub off on the others. ~snicker~

Now who's telling someone what they should do and how they should act. Doesn't irony mean anything to RWers?

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The public schools get money for every student in attendance. When they take their children out of those schools, the schools do not get that allowance. Money that goes to schools is based on enrollment. If they want the schools better, then they should send their children there for funding and so their superior behavior and morals will rub off on the others. ~snicker~

Now who's telling someone what they should do and how they should act. Doesn't irony mean anything to RWers?

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

 

[Oddball]

Now who's telling someone what they should do and how they should act. Doesn't irony mean anything to RWers?

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

Non sequitur.

Gubmint schools are good enough for the peasants, but for rich liberoidal assholes they're not.

The stupid ass is you.

 

[Pete7469]

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Not true. I haven't insulted anyone.

Even questioning moonbat dogma is insulting to them.

Then they have to go to a moonbat website and dig up some "fact" that either distracts from the issue, or blames Bush.

Don't inconvenience these bed wetters like that.

 

[Pete7469]

Now who's telling someone what they should do and how they should act. Doesn't irony mean anything to RWers?

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

redacted...

Stupid analogy anyway, but we'll work with it.

It would be hypocritical if you promoted laws against fucking men in their asses, and then fucked men in their asses.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Here we have yet another leer-jet, limousine Hollywood liberal screaming one thing but doing something else. "Do as I say, not as I do". Proving once again, "Socialism is for the people, not the Socialist".

Matt Damon Puts His Kids In Private School, Despite His Advocacy For Public Schools

How any limousine liberal elitist can live with themselves is beyond comprehension. They wag their finger at parents, mostly blacks and Hispanics, who want vouchers so that their kids do not have to endure bad public schools. At the same time, if there kids are to go to schools in similar condition, they won't think of it to put their kids in private schools.

I thought liberals were about fairness and equality? School Vouchers should be the medium that everyone can agree as a medium for equality. Why is that not the case with liberals? Consistently Inconsistent, Hypocritical, and full of Double Standards.

 

[ClosedCaption]

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

redacted...

Stupid analogy anyway, but we'll work with it.

It would be hypocritical if you promoted laws against fucking men in their asses, and then fucked men in their asses.

And Matt Damon promotes which laws against private schools?

 

[asterism]

They'll say its hypocritical but when you ask them to explain they'll always reply with an insult instead of explaining. Why? Because they cant

Not true. I haven't insulted anyone.

Even questioning moonbat dogma is insulting to them.

Then they have to go to a moonbat website and dig up some "fact" that either distracts from the issue, or blames Bush.

Don't inconvenience these bed wetters like that.

That's true for quite a few liberals, merely questioning or disagreeing with them is offensive. I had one particularly outspoken liberal on another site say that merely questioning the authority of Obama to expand government was racist and extreme. He said that anyone who wants a smaller more limited government was an rightwing nut.

 

[asterism]

What she did is point out the hypocrisy of allegedly "supporting" gubmint schools, while depriving them of students and the funds meant to edumacate them.

A shame you're so dense that you can't figure that out.

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

redacted...

Stupid analogy anyway, but we'll work with it.

It would be hypocritical if you promoted laws against fucking men in their asses, and then fucked men in their asses.

Or hypocritical to call anyone who isn't in favor of unlimited gay rights (including affirmative action) a bigot while shunning their own gay family members.

 

[Pete7469]

If I support gays do I have to fuck a guys ass? No don't be stupid

redacted...

Stupid analogy anyway, but we'll work with it.

It would be hypocritical if you promoted laws against fucking men in their asses, and then fucked men in their asses.

And Matt Damon promotes which laws against private schools?

Who said he did?