Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There can be too much carbon in the atmosphere, you dumb piece of shit.
You go with the .1%, hillbilly.
So are you saying if the atmosphere was made up of 100% CO2, you'd be ok with that?No, there can't, you dumb son of a bitch.
If the atmospheric concentration drops to 200ppm the world DIES.
That's a fact. We are at the LOWEST level of CO2 concentration in hundreds of thousands of years.
That too is a fact.
So are you saying if the atmosphere was made up of 100% CO2, you'd be ok with that?
I was speaking hypothetically.Yet again, you demonstrate your complete lack of scientific knowledge. The maximum CO2 concentration the Earth can ever achieve is about 10,000ppm. But little retard you, has to go and imply that we can become Venus.
Take a science class, junior.
You're way out of your league.
This doesnt look like a historical low to meNo, there can't, you dumb son of a bitch.
If the atmospheric concentration drops to 200ppm the world DIES.
That's a fact. We are at the LOWEST level of CO2 concentration in hundreds of thousands of years.
That too is a fact.
I was speaking hypothetically.
This doesnt look like a historical low to me
![]()
Current & Historical Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Levels Graph
See how levels have never been higher with this fully interactive CO2 graph featuring current & historical CO2 levels and global temperatures. A project by the 2 Degrees Institute.www.co2levels.org
He is the master of pulling things from his ass.There were? Like alive at the same time? I suppose you have a citation or something to back this up.
All that's great, but that doesn't help us much. Human civilization didn't develop in the Jurassic or Cretaceous. Moreover, the presence of more GHGs in the atmosphere is only part of the problem we face.
I'm a scientist. Not a fiction writer, moron.
What about my graph? You going to address that? Or are you just going to continue to spout lies about our current CO2 levels being at historical lows?You don't understand the term hypothetical. Hypothetical implies there is a possibility.
You leaped to an impossibility. That is typical for anti science religious nutjobs.
What about my graph? You going to address that? Or are you just going to continue to spout lies about our current CO2 levels being at historical lows?
There is some evidence that Venus could have been habitable millions of years ago.
Carbon is the fundamental building block of life on this planet.
So how many graphs would you need for me to show that you are a liar? 2? 3? 5,000?Your graph is one of many. Like I said, no scientific research ever is guided by a single graph.
Except for climatology.
Funny that.
So how many graphs would you need for me to show that you are a liar? 2? 3? 5,000?
So the graph I linked doesnt show you are a liar? I'm pretty sure it does. And any sane person would agree with me. You're a retired old man sitting around getting indoctrinated by Fox all day.. We get it. You've lost your mind.No graph shows I am a liar, dumbass. I am quoting well known scientific facts.
YOUR heroes are the ones claiming they don't need to follow the scientific method.
That makes THEM perpetrators of scientific fraud.
So the graph I linked doesnt show you are a liar? I'm pretty sure it does. And any sane person would agree with me. You're a retired old man sitting around getting indoctrinated by Fox all day.. We get it. You've lost your mind.
So in essence you are saying no amount of evidence to the contrary will prove you wrong. You're losing it....No, your graph proves nothing. That's the point. Graphs that are accurate show a particular metric at one particular spot.
That's all. Morons think graphs represent the whole world.
So in essence you are saying no amount of evidence to the contrary will prove you wrong. You're losing it....