McCarthy Admits Benghazi Designed to Flatten Hillary Poll Numbers

[Mertex]

This constant whining from Hillary supporters about the "cost" of investigations is rather amusing since the reason that they have dragged on for as long as they have is that the Clinton's have a long history of stonewalling any investigation into their activities.

First they deny anything happened and blame the whole thing on "Right Wing Conspiracies"...
Then they hide evidence from investigators...
Then when enough time has passed they declare that the scandal is "old news"...and that the investigation is costing the taxpayers millions and needs to stop!

It's what Slick Willie and Hilly DO!

Well, your very own party's committee's are unable to find anything that Hillary or the Obama administration did wrong....(after several other committees on the subject came up with the same result) - that ought to tell you something about your lying party. I think the idiots that vote for these Republicans should bear some of the responsibility for their behavior and the waste of money, which they claim their party is all out for "cutting".


GOP panel on Benghazi finds no Obama administration wrongdoing
LA Times

 

[Mertex]

the party of death comes to Hillary's rescue again. the hell with Mr. Stevens an INNOCENT American civilian who was KILLED because of her and Obama Screw ups

Actually you're wrong about that as your very own expensive investigations have shown.

$20MM OMFG!!!

Do you know how many $20MM it takes to fund One ObamaCare Website?

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

That many

And they help American citizens to get healthcare. What do Benghazi committee investigations do for American citizens? 9 of them?

 

[Mertex]

So when Dirty Hairy Reid accused Romney of not paying taxes, without any evidence and Romney's poll numbers dropped that was OK

Yeah, because Romney never did post his tax returns........so he most likely didn't pay taxes. And how much taxpayer's money did Reid waste in making his statement?

That Republicans admit they set up a committee to investigate something that has already been deemed not a wrongdoing by the Obama Administration by a previous GOP committee and then admit on National TV that their purpose for setting up the committee was just to bring Hillary's poll numbers down......not only are they wasting taxpayer's money, they are lying to their constituents and all Americans about the purpose of their investigation. That you don't see a problem with it just speaks volume about the ethics of Republicans in general.

GOP panel on Benghazi finds no Obama administration wrongdoing
LA Times

 

[Manonthestreet]

Kevn Mac trying to implode his own party.......with lies............makes ya go hhhhmmmmmmm.......Wonder whats in his FBI file he doesnt want coming out

 

[Sun Devil 92]

the party of death comes to Hillary's rescue again. the hell with Mr. Stevens an INNOCENT American civilian who was KILLED because of her and Obama Screw ups

Actually you're wrong about that as your very own expensive investigations have shown.

$20MM OMFG!!!

Do you know how many $20MM it takes to fund One ObamaCare Website?

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000

That many

And they help American citizens to get healthcare. What do Benghazi committee investigations do for American citizens? 9 of them?

Now, that's funny.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

 

[Mertex]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

And yet another post by a faithful mushroom trying to downsize the amount of damage that McCarthy just brought on his own party's credibility by claiming that it was misinterpreted! It was apparent (since it was the 9th investigative committee after 8 others found no wrongdoing) that the reason was for political gain, so his admitting it is nothing new. You can fool yourself all you want, most of us are not that gullible.

GOP panel on Benghazi finds no Obama administration wrongdoing
LA Times

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Republicans will continue to believe that they lose elections due to 'voter fraud,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe that Planned Parenthood 'broke the law,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

And republicans will continue to believe that Clinton was 'responsible' for 'Benghazi,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe these and other lies no matter how comprehensively proven to be wrong, they'll blindly adhere to these lies, and continue to propagate these lies with complete contempt for the truth and facts.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

And yet another post by a faithful mushroom trying to downsize the amount of damage that McCarthy just brought on his own party's credibility by claiming that it was misinterpreted! It was apparent (since it was the 9th investigative committee after 8 others found no wrongdoing) that the reason was for political gain, so his admitting it is nothing new. You can fool yourself all you want, most of us are not that gullible.

GOP panel on Benghazi finds no Obama administration wrongdoing
LA Times

Anyone who thought that was anything but political theater probably needs some addtional school.

Anyone who thinks McCarthy admitted as much should go with them.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Republicans will continue to believe that they lose elections due to 'voter fraud,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe that Planned Parenthood 'broke the law,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

And republicans will continue to believe that Clinton was 'responsible' for 'Benghazi,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe these and other lies no matter how comprehensively proven to be wrong, they'll blindly adhere to these lies, and continue to propagate these lies with complete contempt for the truth and facts.

Not a fan of the GOP.

They have more state houses than the democrats.

They own the house...and will continue to do so.

They currently own the senate.

But they are losing elections ???

Who knew.

 

[nuhuh]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

Yeah, too bad the right wing moron can't pick up a newspaper and read the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Los Angeles Times, Bloomberg who all concurred that McCarthy put his foot in his mouth.

 

[healthmyths]

Republicans will continue to believe that they lose elections due to 'voter fraud,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe that Planned Parenthood 'broke the law,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

And republicans will continue to believe that Clinton was 'responsible' for 'Benghazi,' although the facts demonstrate nothing could be further from the truth.

Republicans will continue to believe these and other lies no matter how comprehensively proven to be wrong, they'll blindly adhere to these lies, and continue to propagate these lies with complete contempt for the truth and facts.

SHOW ME HOW PP segregated Federal funds from Non-federal funds when paying for abortion services' expenses! SHOW ME!!!
Those federal dollars were the single largest source of money coming into the organization and its local affiliates, by far.
Another $305.3 million came from nongovernment sources,
about $257.4 million reached the organization after private donors and foundations made contributions and bequests.
The organization also raised another $54.7 million in fees charged for its services.
How Planned Parenthood actually uses its federal funding

I've asked dummies like you to show me in the Planned Parenthood reports where NONE of the $528 million was spent on paying the bills for abortion services. Bills like:
1) Utilities -- water, electricity, phones. Are ALL the abortions done in facilities that utilities are paid from NON Federal sources revenue? SHOW ME PLEASE!
2) Salaries...Doctors, nurses, etc. Are all those people that are doing abortions paid with NON-federal funds? SHOW ME PLEASE!
3) Rent--- are the facilities where abortions done in separate totally paid with NON-Federal funds? SHOW ME PLEASE!
4) All other overhead expenses, computers, supplies, etc. all involved in Abortion services PAID with NON-Federal funds??? Show me!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

 

[Zander]

McCarthy never admitted anything, except that hiLIARy's lies have hurt her campaign.

 

[healthmyths]

The lie that was told and retold by the administration until long after everyone knew otherwise that they thought it was a spontaneous attack alone easily justified the cost of the investigation. Obama and Rice both clearly lied whatever you want to call it, they both knew it wasn't. If Republicans knowingly lied, you'd be screaming for their heads, not arguing that somehow it wasn't illegal

But it never was a legitimate investigation. It was a charade and a fraud used to discredit a legitimate candidate for office.

It certainly was a legit investigation. Four Americans were killed and it was important enough for those who were indirectly responsible to coverup their failure. That's a warrant for an investigation if ever there was one.

hmmm, how about a warrant issued for the deaths of 4,500 Americans based on the lies by George W, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo conservatives?

WHAT F...king LIES????
To tell a LIE means you know that what you are saying is NOT TRUE!
Maybe you should ask THESE PEOPLE WHY they were lying also!!!
Reasons for War: Things you might have forgotten about Iraq.
"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.

"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path."
Sen. Tom Daschle (D, SD), Feb. 12, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998.

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. I'm a co-sponsor of the bipartisan resolution that's presently under consideration in the Senate. Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave threat to America and our allies..."
John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct. 10, 2002.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?

When you realize the CIA put out bad intelligence it will hit you like lightning. When you realize that Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Colin Powell, George Bush, Donald Rumselfeld et al, purposefully twisted intelligence to deliver a false narrative you will be thunderstruck.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?[/QUOTE]
"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.
"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path."
Sen. Tom Daschle (D, SD), Feb. 12, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998.

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. I'm a co-sponsor of the bipartisan resolution that's presently under consideration in the Senate. Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave threat to America and our allies..."
John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct. 10, 2002.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?

 

[nuhuh]

But it never was a legitimate investigation. It was a charade and a fraud used to discredit a legitimate candidate for office.

It certainly was a legit investigation. Four Americans were killed and it was important enough for those who were indirectly responsible to coverup their failure. That's a warrant for an investigation if ever there was one.

hmmm, how about a warrant issued for the deaths of 4,500 Americans based on the lies by George W, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and the rest of the neo conservatives?

WHAT F...king LIES????
To tell a LIE means you know that what you are saying is NOT TRUE!
Maybe you should ask THESE PEOPLE WHY they were lying also!!!
Reasons for War: Things you might have forgotten about Iraq.
"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.

"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path."
Sen. Tom Daschle (D, SD), Feb. 12, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998.

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. I'm a co-sponsor of the bipartisan resolution that's presently under consideration in the Senate. Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave threat to America and our allies..."
John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct. 10, 2002.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?

When you realize the CIA put out bad intelligence it will hit you like lightning. When you realize that Dick Cheney, John Yoo, Colin Powell, George Bush, Donald Rumselfeld et al, purposefully twisted intelligence to deliver a false narrative you will be thunderstruck.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?

"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation's wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.
"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path."
Sen. Tom Daschle (D, SD), Feb. 12, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998.

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. I'm a co-sponsor of the bipartisan resolution that's presently under consideration in the Senate. Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave threat to America and our allies..."
John Edwards (D, NC), Oct. 7, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct. 10, 2002.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction .... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

ALL DEMOCRATS!!! Are they LIARS ALSO?[/QUOTE]

Take your anti-psychotics you'll feel better in the morning.

 

[Political Junky]

McCarthy never admitted anything, except that hiLIARy's lies have hurt her campaign.

LOL, stay tuned to the news, starting tomorrow.

 

[healthmyths]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

 

[nuhuh]

It comes as no surprise, of course, that most on the right lack the honesty and integrity to just admit the truth: that 'Benghazi' was solely about 'getting Clinton,' pure partisanism having nothing to do with objective facts or evidence.

Explain then why it was so critical for Rice to say on 5 network shows BEFORE the facts were in that it was a video?
Explain why Hillary told The Mother of Benghazi victim said: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame"
Mother of Benghazi victim: Hillary and Susan Rice told me “nose to nose” that the Mohammed video was to blame

Why was it so important less then 7 weeks from re-election to blame the video? WHY do you suppose??

Why did the House Select Committee on Intelligence vindicate Susan Rice 20 months ago and you haven't acknowledged it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yet another thread that manufactures an interpretation that only a left wing moron could come up with.....

of the same statement.

At least they are consistent....consistently wrong.

Yeah, too bad the right wing moron can't pick up a newspaper and read the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The Los Angeles Times, Bloomberg who all concurred that McCarthy put his foot in his mouth.

Oh look....a McCarthy moment.

Looks like this poster just admitted others do his thinking for him.