McConnell Cannot Block Witnesses - Just Announced

[eddiew]

The witnesses NOT ALLOWED to testify by trump would have more than proven Trump was guilty as sin Was there ANY proof Trump didn't commit a crime,,,or just repub BS ? Since when do we have a trial without witnesses ?? Repubs in the senate are scared of the POS in the WH They are cowardly traitors

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

The commies are using you people and you don't even realize it. The commies want Biden to win, so they want to prolong this impeachment farce as long as they can to bring those other Senators in for the hearing and keep them off the campaign trail. You people are suckers for falling into their trap.

The man putin put in office ,trump is fulfilling all of Russias wishes. Putin dances in the street We've lost most of our allies thanks to Trump and his herd

 

[eddiew]

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

How is it that so many adults dont know how trials work?

Dope addled illiterate Democrats whose lives are focused on meth and deviant porn.

Grab any snatch recently picaro ....like your king has??

 

[eddiew]

The witnesses NOT ALLOWED to testify by trump would have more than proven Trump was guilty as sin Was there ANY proof Trump didn't commit a crime,,,or just repub BS ? Since when do we have a trial without witnesses ?? Repubs in the senate are scared of the POS in the WH They are cowardly traitors

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

How is it that so many adults dont know how trials work?

Yes Trials have witnesses 15 impeachment trials and this is the ONLY one with none

 

[Fiero425]

So it's okay that the commies keep the two people hidden that started all this, but now you say the truth is what people are after? What about the 18th witness that Schiff is surpassing? What is the truth he is hiding over there?

This isn't that difficult to follow. If the House has an impeachable offense with proof of their charge, then they present it. Apparently the commies lied once again. They didn't have proof of the charge, and now they want the Republicans to help them find it. Sorry, we don't play those leftist games.

Another case of "Hey, Look Over There".

It's actually a case where the impeachment articles are bogus because there was not any substantial proof of the charge. The commies know this quite well, but impeached him without the necessary information to do it properly.

The “commies” have not failed yet

I think all they are hoping for is to defeat trump in november

which they plan to do by driving down his popularity

What popularity is that? Trump won by 77,000 votes over 3 states and they've moved on! his lack of credibility will be his downfall! You can't believe a word the man says! He has to exaggerate or lie about everything and it makes no sense since he did win the presidency! It wasn't enough; it had to be the biggest, best, most transparent admin. known to man which we all know is BS! I feel for his supporters because when it blows up, the $#!t will cover them all for life! I hate to say I actually allowed politics to fracture an assoc.! I couldn't let it go and a 40 year friendship is dead! More of that will occur when those supporters finally take their blinders off and feel they have to make amends to all concerned!

I agree that we are a deeply fractured society, but the rift between Americans is caused by the losers of the 2016 election who were outraged that Hillary didn't win as expected.

The liberal media, Democrats, and the "Deep State" concocted a phony Russian collusion excuse that many ordinary Americans bought hook line and sinker.

And it's made you bitter and hate filled.

And it won't go away soo.n

Seek help babe! If you can overlook the obvious corruption in DC in the Republican party, that's on you! I personally don't GAF anymore! I'm old, retired, and will just observe as you fools destroy democracy as we know it! I don't need to care or live in a society that would condone taking immigrant babies out of the arms of the mothers only to put them in cages; some proved to have died! We have no high ground after that; totally blown off and not even acknowledged! That's a fk'n shame, but it goes on! Muslim travel bans are thwarted only by the courts since conservatives thinks that's how we should handle things with terrorist; "just stop all Muslims from traveling!" We're such a-holes and a reckoning will come! This kind of autocracy will blow up in all of your fk'n faces! Get ready for reestablishment of internment camps, experimenting on minorities, and in general being typical white supremacist a-holes! Have a great life if you survive this undermining of democracy!

 

[eddiew]

The House can’t call witnesses at the trial. Good lord, did you actually read ?

Good Lord, do you actually think? The House called and heard witnesses during their big sham "investigation". Those testimonies were part of the impeachment managers' presentation to the Senate.

The only thing the House can't do is force the Senate to do their investigatory job by calling EVEN MORE witnesses, which the House didn't bother to call before.

If the House wanted to present extra witness testimony to the Senate, they should have tended to that before now.

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

 

[Meister]

Good Lord, do you actually think? The House called and heard witnesses during their big sham "investigation". Those testimonies were part of the impeachment managers' presentation to the Senate.

The only thing the House can't do is force the Senate to do their investigatory job by calling EVEN MORE witnesses, which the House didn't bother to call before.

If the House wanted to present extra witness testimony to the Senate, they should have tended to that before now.

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

I will take a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times any day who has done what Trump has done for this country over the last 3 years.

What American bank lends zoos and perverts?

 

[eddiew]

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

I will take a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times any day who has done what Trump has done for this country over the last 3 years.

What American bank lends zoos and perverts?

Wouldn't lend him a zoo otherwise known as not lending him a nickle Old Brooklyn slang

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

How is it that so many adults dont know how trials work?

Yes Trials have witnesses 15 impeachment trials and this is the ONLY one with none

False.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Good Lord, do you actually think? The House called and heard witnesses during their big sham "investigation". Those testimonies were part of the impeachment managers' presentation to the Senate.

The only thing the House can't do is force the Senate to do their investigatory job by calling EVEN MORE witnesses, which the House didn't bother to call before.

If the House wanted to present extra witness testimony to the Senate, they should have tended to that before now.

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

Actually, Trump had bankrupt companies four times in his career, and most of them were during challenging economic times. However Trump also owned or operated over 500 companies, so you'd be hell pressed to find somebody that ran that amount of businesses with only four bankruptcies.

That bankrupt guy has his own jet. He has been with the most beautiful women in the world. If that's what you think is failure, I'd be glad to take failure any day of the week.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Another case of "Hey, Look Over There".

It's actually a case where the impeachment articles are bogus because there was not any substantial proof of the charge. The commies know this quite well, but impeached him without the necessary information to do it properly.

The “commies” have not failed yet

I think all they are hoping for is to defeat trump in november

which they plan to do by driving down his popularity

What popularity is that? Trump won by 77,000 votes over 3 states and they've moved on! his lack of credibility will be his downfall! You can't believe a word the man says! He has to exaggerate or lie about everything and it makes no sense since he did win the presidency! It wasn't enough; it had to be the biggest, best, most transparent admin. known to man which we all know is BS! I feel for his supporters because when it blows up, the $#!t will cover them all for life! I hate to say I actually allowed politics to fracture an assoc.! I couldn't let it go and a 40 year friendship is dead! More of that will occur when those supporters finally take their blinders off and feel they have to make amends to all concerned!

I agree that we are a deeply fractured society, but the rift between Americans is caused by the losers of the 2016 election who were outraged that Hillary didn't win as expected.

The liberal media, Democrats, and the "Deep State" concocted a phony Russian collusion excuse that many ordinary Americans bought hook line and sinker.

And it's made you bitter and hate filled.

And it won't go away soo.n

Seek help babe! If you can overlook the obvious corruption in DC in the Republican party, that's on you! I personally don't GAF anymore! I'm old, retired, and will just observe as you fools destroy democracy as we know it! I don't need to care or live in a society that would condone taking immigrant babies out of the arms of the mothers only to put them in cages; some proved to have died! We have no high ground after that; totally blown off and not even acknowledged! That's a fk'n shame, but it goes on! Muslim travel bans are thwarted only by the courts since conservatives thinks that's how we should handle things with terrorist; "just stop all Muslims from traveling!" We're such a-holes and a reckoning will come! This kind of autocracy will blow up in all of your fk'n faces! Get ready for reestablishment of internment camps, experimenting on minorities, and in general being typical white supremacist a-holes! Have a great life if you survive this undermining of democracy!

Those pictures you seen of kids in cages were taken during the Obama years. The Democrat party put out the war call for all foreigners to try and get into this country, and it overwhelmed our system. Then, the Democrats in the House refused to pass spending bills that would actually take care of those kids, because children to Democrats are expendable. They provide a political purpose for Big Brother.

Your Muslim travel ban allowed most Muslims to come to our country. Many other Muslim nations were not included in that ban, but the liars in the MSM brainwashed you differently.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

How is it that so many adults dont know how trials work?

Yes Trials have witnesses 15 impeachment trials and this is the ONLY one with none

How is that possible when there were only three successful impeachments in our country? If a President was not impeached in the House, then it never gets to the Senate. Speaking of which, the first impeachment in our country didn't have any witnesses at all in the Senate trial.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

The commies are using you people and you don't even realize it. The commies want Biden to win, so they want to prolong this impeachment farce as long as they can to bring those other Senators in for the hearing and keep them off the campaign trail. You people are suckers for falling into their trap.

The man putin put in office ,trump is fulfilling all of Russias wishes. Putin dances in the street We've lost most of our allies thanks to Trump and his herd

We have? Who have we lost? There is no possible way for Russia to influence our elections. I have expert testimony that the idea is ridiculous.

 

[lantern2814]

I'm not sure I understand. It seems that the democrats helped Trump out by not going through
the process of subpoenaing the witnesses they needed to make their case. Instead, they buttoned
it up too early and demanded that the repubs do their work for them. The dems have nobody to blame
but themselves. You need to work on focusing your anger at the right group of people.

Nothing they did helped Trump. They wore his legal team down to the “so what” defense. Alexander doesn’t want Bolton to testify because what he is going to say has already been proven.

I have no anger for anyone that did everything they could to get the truth out.

No, the dems did not do everything they could to get the truth out. They cut corners and tried to get
the Senate to do the work they should have done. I'm not sure why you are defending them
as you are. The dems feet are the ones who's feet should be held to the fire.

You have any idea how long it would take to get the lawsuits through the court? McGhan’s lawsuit has a single ruling in district court and that was like 8 months ago. This will take years and I have little doubt they will be taking these to court now. Nothing was lost by going an alternative route.

The Senate should have called witnesses during the trial. The House can’t do that. They weren’t asking the Senate to do their job for them. They were asking the Senate to do the job the Constitution gives them.

The Senate did do their job. This was a bogus impeachment that had no supporting evidence to their claim. In spite of that, they impeached the President anyway. Could you imagine if this happened outside of government in a court of law; somebody going to prison because another person thought they were going to rob a bank? It's unheard of.

There is nothing more to add to this impeachment. The Senators found the impeachment to be phony, and with that, Trump is not guilty of anything.

Yes, the Senate did it's job providing it was to get at least 4 Republican Senators replaced by either Dems or Indys. And they are completely successful.

Blatant lying and desperation on display here. News flash: Republicans will take the House, you aren’t coming CLOSE to getting the Senate, and Trump will roll to re-election. Looking forward to your tears in November.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Nothing they did helped Trump. They wore his legal team down to the “so what” defense. Alexander doesn’t want Bolton to testify because what he is going to say has already been proven.

I have no anger for anyone that did everything they could to get the truth out.

No, the dems did not do everything they could to get the truth out. They cut corners and tried to get
the Senate to do the work they should have done. I'm not sure why you are defending them
as you are. The dems feet are the ones who's feet should be held to the fire.

You have any idea how long it would take to get the lawsuits through the court? McGhan’s lawsuit has a single ruling in district court and that was like 8 months ago. This will take years and I have little doubt they will be taking these to court now. Nothing was lost by going an alternative route.

The Senate should have called witnesses during the trial. The House can’t do that. They weren’t asking the Senate to do their job for them. They were asking the Senate to do the job the Constitution gives them.

The Senate did do their job. This was a bogus impeachment that had no supporting evidence to their claim. In spite of that, they impeached the President anyway. Could you imagine if this happened outside of government in a court of law; somebody going to prison because another person thought they were going to rob a bank? It's unheard of.

There is nothing more to add to this impeachment. The Senators found the impeachment to be phony, and with that, Trump is not guilty of anything.

Yes, the Senate did it's job providing it was to get at least 4 Republican Senators replaced by either Dems or Indys. And they are completely successful.

Blatant lying and desperation on display here. News flash: Republicans will take the House, you aren’t coming CLOSE to getting the Senate, and Trump will roll to re-election. Looking forward to your tears in November.

Gee, your bunch said that for 2018. How's that working out for you. Now, you had better worry about the Senate. It doesn't look like the Republican Senators are going to assist you so you need to do a better job for the Senate.

 

[lantern2814]

No, the dems did not do everything they could to get the truth out. They cut corners and tried to get
the Senate to do the work they should have done. I'm not sure why you are defending them
as you are. The dems feet are the ones who's feet should be held to the fire.

You have any idea how long it would take to get the lawsuits through the court? McGhan’s lawsuit has a single ruling in district court and that was like 8 months ago. This will take years and I have little doubt they will be taking these to court now. Nothing was lost by going an alternative route.

The Senate should have called witnesses during the trial. The House can’t do that. They weren’t asking the Senate to do their job for them. They were asking the Senate to do the job the Constitution gives them.

The Senate did do their job. This was a bogus impeachment that had no supporting evidence to their claim. In spite of that, they impeached the President anyway. Could you imagine if this happened outside of government in a court of law; somebody going to prison because another person thought they were going to rob a bank? It's unheard of.

There is nothing more to add to this impeachment. The Senators found the impeachment to be phony, and with that, Trump is not guilty of anything.

Yes, the Senate did it's job providing it was to get at least 4 Republican Senators replaced by either Dems or Indys. And they are completely successful.

Blatant lying and desperation on display here. News flash: Republicans will take the House, you aren’t coming CLOSE to getting the Senate, and Trump will roll to re-election. Looking forward to your tears in November.

Gee, your bunch said that for 2018. How's that working out for you. Now, you had better worry about the Senate. It doesn't look like the Republican Senators are going to assist you so you need to do a better job for the Senate.

Gee dipshit, you didn’t get the Senate despite an epic amount of fraud committed by the Dimbos with “ballot harvesting” and “found ballots”. Here’s hint, learn something before spouting your normal idiocy. Factcheck? Yeah, using a far left site to deny the truth. Get ready to cry a lot, better stock up on tissues and butthurt cream.

 

[DOTR]

ᴾᴿᴬᴳ on Twitter

 

[Picaro]

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

Actually, Trump had bankrupt companies four times in his career, and most of them were during challenging economic times. However Trump also owned or operated over 500 companies, so you'd be hell pressed to find somebody that ran that amount of businesses with only four bankruptcies.

That bankrupt guy has his own jet. He has been with the most beautiful women in the world. If that's what you think is failure, I'd be glad to take failure any day of the week.

Don't know any wealthy people who made their money in real markets and not government who didn't fail, sometimes several times, before hitting it big. Trump''s record of business failures is far far below the normal rates for the number of businesses he's started, and in notoriously corrupt Democrat controlled cities and states to boot.

 

[Picaro]

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

The commies are using you people and you don't even realize it. The commies want Biden to win, so they want to prolong this impeachment farce as long as they can to bring those other Senators in for the hearing and keep them off the campaign trail. You people are suckers for falling into their trap.

The man putin put in office ,trump is fulfilling all of Russias wishes. Putin dances in the street We've lost most of our allies thanks to Trump and his herd

We have? Who have we lost? There is no possible way for Russia to influence our elections. I have expert testimony that the idea is ridiculous.

lol they get more ridiculous every day; the only American pols we know for a fact Russians bribed were Hillary's crew and the hundreds of millions they raked in from Russian deals, via her fake 'Foundation' and Podesta's channels, while all they have re Trump is that he said hello to Putin once or something.

 

[Picaro]

Good Lord, do you actually think? The House called and heard witnesses during their big sham "investigation". Those testimonies were part of the impeachment managers' presentation to the Senate.

The only thing the House can't do is force the Senate to do their investigatory job by calling EVEN MORE witnesses, which the House didn't bother to call before.

If the House wanted to present extra witness testimony to the Senate, they should have tended to that before now.

There have been 15 impeachment trials in the senate This is the FIRST one without witnesses

Not to mention that it's the first time that the accused didn't have his Due Process, you
forgot about that part, huh?
Well, the House had 17...maybe 18 witnesses, they should have subpoenaed any others that they wanted.Instead,
they wanted to end their proceedings early and get home before Christmas.
There was lots of testimony used in the Senate that the House provided.

Should have subpoenaed others ???The WH refused to let witnesses appear the WH refused to show documents A trial without witnesses is NO TRIAL at all And now the POS in the WH can strut around saying he's innocent??? Not by a long shot

That's what they got courts for, Ed. Exercise the three branches that's what they're here for.
No excuses for the democrats....and let's be honest, it wasn't about impeaching the president.
The democrats knew that wasn't going to happen from the get-go, they just wanted to smear Trump
in this election year. The dems know that their stable of mules couldn't win an election for an
environmental technician much less a president.

Maybe what we need meister is a game show host who went bankrupt 6 times and who no American bank will lend him a zoo,a liar and pervert I'll tell the DNC to start looking

Most of those bankruptcies were caused by having to bribe so many Democrat pols just to exist. You parasites are of course proud of that.

 

[Mac-7]

The accused is innocent because he broke no laws. Even if it could be proven that Trump did a quid pro quo to pressure Ukraine into investigating the Biden situation, there is nothing illegal about that. In fact, quid pro quo's have been used by most Presidents in the past.

It's impossible to prove motive, especially given the fact at the time of the call, the nomination was nearly a year away as to who Trump's opponent would be. So that negates this phony claim that Trump did it for personal reasons. Therefore, the impeachment and charge are totally bogus.

The witnesses NOT ALLOWED to testify by trump would have more than proven Trump was guilty as sin Was there ANY proof Trump didn't commit a crime,,,or just repub BS ? Since when do we have a trial without witnesses ?? Repubs in the senate are scared of the POS in the WH They are cowardly traitors

Trump has executive privilege and every right to invoke it

Ever hear of anyone on trial refusing to hear those who will prove his innocence? I haven't .Maybe you have Ever hear of an impeachment trial without witnesses?

When the prosecution cannot prove guilt the defense rests

We proved it and would have proved it even more beyond a shadow of a doubt if the lying traitors in Repub senate weren't scared to death of the pig in the WH and allowed testimony from those under subpoena

“Lying traitors” huh?

Are liberals and democrats lying traitors when they find a weaselly obama judge to block a trump executive order that that takes months or more to overturn by a less biased higher court?

like the man said, if you live by the sword you die by the sword