McDonalds Introduces Self Serving Kiosks in Response to Min Wage Increase

[danielpalos]

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

You just can't help yourself, can you?

why blame the poor?

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

because lazy fucks like you would just stay unemployed and live at mama's house

why would You need to care, if You can find a job easier, that may even pay a bonus?

 

[danielpalos]

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

You just can't help yourself, can you?

why blame the poor?

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

forcing a warfare-State on us without wartime tax rates, is even dumber. That is simply one more reason, why nobody takes the US, national and social, right wing seriously about economics or the law.

 

[Wyatt earp]

and just what work ethic is that?

just lousy reading comprehension from the fantastical, right wing?

by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

that is meaningless.

Not into morals?

By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return."

Nope. If people don't want to work enough to pay their own way that's their problem not mine

You don't seem to understand that when I was in my 20s and 30s I regularly worked 70 hours a week to support myself and to save for my future

If all you want to work is 40 hours a week, call out sick 10 or more times a year or refuse to come in early and stay late then you get what you get

no one who has ever accomplished anything in life only worked 40 hours a week

How many hours did Jesus the Christ put in?

 

[danielpalos]

don't be lazy; work hard, just like the poor.

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

You assume there are additional hours available to our 30 million working poor
Got any stats to support that?

Anyone can find extra work if they want to.

One person can
30 million people who work and need government assistance can't

Show me where there are 30 million jobs out there that are unfilled

Look in every classifies
d ad in every newspaper in the country and add them up. Then add up all the opportunities to make extra money on your own initiative

Of course you are assuming all those people actually want to look for work

Firms claiming to have positions they can't fill; assumes they want to hire.

there is no, unemployment under capitalism; only underpayment.

 

[danielpalos]

why blame the poor?

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

Or else we can examine our tax code
We have been relaxing corporate tax rates, providing numerous exemptions and subsidies and relaxed regulations over the last thirty years. All in the name of increasing corporate profits expecting a trickle down of more jobs and better wages. Corporations just kept the extra profits

Since it never happened and we now have to pay to support the lower waged workers, it is time to readjust those rates to help pay for the welfare we are forced to give

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

 

[danielpalos]

just lousy reading comprehension from the fantastical, right wing?

by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

that is meaningless.

Not into morals?

By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return."

Nope. If people don't want to work enough to pay their own way that's their problem not mine

You don't seem to understand that when I was in my 20s and 30s I regularly worked 70 hours a week to support myself and to save for my future

If all you want to work is 40 hours a week, call out sick 10 or more times a year or refuse to come in early and stay late then you get what you get

no one who has ever accomplished anything in life only worked 40 hours a week

How many hours did Jesus the Christ put in?

Just national socialist right wing projection when they have to, "abandon" their position due to being simply, clueless and Causeless.

 

[hadit]

You just can't help yourself, can you?

why blame the poor?

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

forcing a warfare-State on us without wartime tax rates, is even dumber. That is simply one more reason, why nobody takes the US, national and social, right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Put the bong down or stop posting. Doing both at the same time is not a good thing.

 

[hadit]

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

Or else we can examine our tax code
We have been relaxing corporate tax rates, providing numerous exemptions and subsidies and relaxed regulations over the last thirty years. All in the name of increasing corporate profits expecting a trickle down of more jobs and better wages. Corporations just kept the extra profits

Since it never happened and we now have to pay to support the lower waged workers, it is time to readjust those rates to help pay for the welfare we are forced to give

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

 

[danielpalos]

why blame the poor?

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

forcing a warfare-State on us without wartime tax rates, is even dumber. That is simply one more reason, why nobody takes the US, national and social, right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Put the bong down or stop posting. Doing both at the same time is not a good thing.

pick up a bong so you can have an excuse to have nothing but diversion, which is usually considered fallacy;

national socialist right wing, "intellectual" moocher.

 

[danielpalos]

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

Or else we can examine our tax code
We have been relaxing corporate tax rates, providing numerous exemptions and subsidies and relaxed regulations over the last thirty years. All in the name of increasing corporate profits expecting a trickle down of more jobs and better wages. Corporations just kept the extra profits

Since it never happened and we now have to pay to support the lower waged workers, it is time to readjust those rates to help pay for the welfare we are forced to give

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

 

[hadit]

I'm not, that's why your slogans are so stupid.

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

forcing a warfare-State on us without wartime tax rates, is even dumber. That is simply one more reason, why nobody takes the US, national and social, right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Put the bong down or stop posting. Doing both at the same time is not a good thing.

pick up a bong so you can have an excuse to have nothing but diversion, which is usually considered fallacy;

national socialist right wing, "intellectual" moocher.

Is English your second or third language?

 

[hadit]

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

Or else we can examine our tax code
We have been relaxing corporate tax rates, providing numerous exemptions and subsidies and relaxed regulations over the last thirty years. All in the name of increasing corporate profits expecting a trickle down of more jobs and better wages. Corporations just kept the extra profits

Since it never happened and we now have to pay to support the lower waged workers, it is time to readjust those rates to help pay for the welfare we are forced to give

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

 

[danielpalos]

Yeah, right. Why not unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour with a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage?

If society wants that kind of welfare state, then society needs to write legislation, raise taxes and start handing out the money. Forcing companies to be welfare distribution centers is dumb.

forcing a warfare-State on us without wartime tax rates, is even dumber. That is simply one more reason, why nobody takes the US, national and social, right wing seriously about economics or the law.

Put the bong down or stop posting. Doing both at the same time is not a good thing.

pick up a bong so you can have an excuse to have nothing but diversion, which is usually considered fallacy;

national socialist right wing, "intellectual" moocher.

Is English your second or third language?

still working on attention surpluses?

 

[danielpalos]

Or else we can examine our tax code
We have been relaxing corporate tax rates, providing numerous exemptions and subsidies and relaxed regulations over the last thirty years. All in the name of increasing corporate profits expecting a trickle down of more jobs and better wages. Corporations just kept the extra profits

Since it never happened and we now have to pay to support the lower waged workers, it is time to readjust those rates to help pay for the welfare we are forced to give

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

Only if he quits for unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so he won't have to pay as much personal income tax.

 

[hadit]

Since customers actually pay all those corporate taxes, isn't it about time to give the taxpayer a break?

And no one is "forced" to give welfare. It's a societal decision to do so. Like I said, if society wants everyone to have a guaranteed salary...

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

Only if he quits for unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so he won't have to pay as much personal income tax.

You don't get UE if you quit a job, and shouldn't. We've been through this.

 

[danielpalos]

it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

Only if he quits for unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so he won't have to pay as much personal income tax.

You don't get UE if you quit a job, and shouldn't. We've been through this.

attention deficits instead of attention surpluses? it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

 

[hadit]

Are you demanding that Bill Gates receive welfare benefits, since it's "equal protection of the law", or does that only apply to things you favor?

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

Only if he quits for unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so he won't have to pay as much personal income tax.

You don't get UE if you quit a job, and shouldn't. We've been through this.

attention deficits instead of attention surpluses? it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Did you really think what you said related to this discussion in particular and reality in general? Because it does not.

 

[danielpalos]

Just clueless and Causeless? Or are you running, massive attention deficits, like the national and socialist right wing, prefers to do.

So Bill Gates gets welfare then?

Only if he quits for unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, so he won't have to pay as much personal income tax.

You don't get UE if you quit a job, and shouldn't. We've been through this.

attention deficits instead of attention surpluses? it is about equal protection of the law. it is in our social Contract. Only the poor, can't seem to afford equal protection of the law.

Did you really think what you said related to this discussion in particular and reality in general? Because it does not.

Only the US, national and socialist, right wing; doesn't believe in equal protection of the law.

Real national socialists, claimed to believe this: All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.

 

[Skull Pilot]

you mean "the poor" who don't want to work more than 40 hours a week ?

You assume there are additional hours available to our 30 million working poor
Got any stats to support that?

Anyone can find extra work if they want to.

One person can
30 million people who work and need government assistance can't

Show me where there are 30 million jobs out there that are unfilled

Look in every classifies
d ad in every newspaper in the country and add them up. Then add up all the opportunities to make extra money on your own initiative

Of course you are assuming all those people actually want to look for work

You keep looking from a microeconomic (individual person or company) view.....Yes, a small percentage of low wage workers can find better jobs
But from a macroeconomic (whole country) view, our economy does not have enough "better paying jobs" for low wage workers to move into. Those jobs used to be in manufacturing and construction....but there are not 30 million of those jobs out there
Starting a small business is not a solution for most burger flippers. Even with highly qualified entrepreneurs, most small businesses fail

So your "work harder and find a better job" solution does little to solve the problem of low wage workers needing government assistance

I never said anything about a better job I said that people can work more than 40 hours a week if they have to in order to pay their bills.

 

[Skull Pilot]

and just what work ethic is that?

just lousy reading comprehension from the fantastical, right wing?

by the "sweat of their brow" practicing a work ethic from the Age of Iron.

that is meaningless.

Not into morals?

By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return."

Nope. If people don't want to work enough to pay their own way that's their problem not mine

You don't seem to understand that when I was in my 20s and 30s I regularly worked 70 hours a week to support myself and to save for my future

If all you want to work is 40 hours a week, call out sick 10 or more times a year or refuse to come in early and stay late then you get what you get

no one who has ever accomplished anything in life only worked 40 hours a week

How many hours did Jesus the Christ put in?

Don't know don't care