Meet Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[jillian]

typical ^^^^^^^

socialist - communist ... soooooooooooooooooooooo confusing to morons.

Typical...a left-wing minion is forced to come face-to-face with the left-wing lie and instead attempts to hijack and redirect the thread.

Communism is socialism, you uneducated little dimwit. Two sides of the exact same coin. Now about the hypocrisy of the people you bow down to and worship?

As an ideology, communism is generally regarded as hard-left, making fewer concessions to market capitalism and electoral democracy than do most forms of socialism. As a system of government, communism tends to center on a one-party state that bans most forms of political dissent. These two usages of the term "communism" – one referring to theory, the other to politics as they are practiced – need not overlap: China's ruling Communist Party has an explicitly pro-market capitalist orientation and pays only lip service to the Maoist ideology whose purist adherents (Peru's Shining Path in its heyday, for example) regard Chinese authorities as bourgeois counterrevolutionaries.

Socialism can refer to a vast swath of the political spectrum, in theory and in practice. Its intellectual history is more varied than that of communism: the Communist Manifesto devotes a chapter to criticizing the half-dozen forms of socialism already in existence at the time, and proponents have taken just about every left-of-center stance on the ideal (or best achievable) structure of economic and political systems.


bite me, moron

Over taxation and excessive spending are two of the current consequences of European socialism.

Socialism even in moderate 'pick and choose' forms requires a massive government infrastructure to control centers of national manufacturing, healthcare, education, and internal security forces. Not to mention spending to subsidize a large percentage of its population for guaranteed housing, food programs, etc. I don't know about you but surrendering means of manufacturing to the government seems like big risk.

And even if an American socialism was to follow the European model of state regulation of industry versus outright ownership, you're still throwing your economic fate solely in the hands of bureaucrats vulnerable to whim and fancy, only their greed now expands across all means of production.

The step to communism from socialism can be a very small one. Once government has become a monolithic owner of economic and industrial bases, citizens become very vulnerable to becoming market hostages of the State. Any form of mass resistance or take back of economical control by the people could result in suspension and then removal of individual rights and freedoms. Collectivism and group politics is a set of matches we Americans do not want to play with.

The step to communism from socialism can be a very small one. Once government has become a monolithic owner of economic and industrial bases, citizens become very vulnerable to becoming market hostages of the State.

This is what it is now. You can't possibly be that willfully ignorant.

Which is why she won, and why the people are going to take back control of their rights and freedoms.

Mass resistance is the right of the people. Ever read the Constitution dimwit?

Who do you think the Framers intended to endow our freedoms to? Walmart, Amazon, Exxon Mobil?

If you do, then you thought wrong. The Framers saw those corporations as the very definition of tyranny. That, and a standing Army. Which is why Jefferson cut the standing Army to a third of what it was after he took office.

You need some serious education on just what America is son.

And you need to wade back out of the waters of historic Socialist murk. Tell me, do you believe the People under a successful socialist revolutionary vanguard control the government, its means of production and its economy? If you do, then you must admit card carrying membership status in the socialist care bear scouts of America. We know what you champion, and the lies told historically to get the working class and peasantry on board. There will be no socio-communista revolution in America--bloodless, cultural or otherwise.

You would compare our Founders to the Soviet Bolsheviks? Are you identifying yourself as the enemy of your nation?

let's try to focus on who the enemy of our nation is right now.... vlad and his puppet Donald and anyone who supports them

 

[eagle1462010]

You mean the lying OxyContin junkie who uses insurance to pay for his erections but doesn’t want women to have health care?

Is there anything more comical than the hysteria of the left? Especially jillian

I just spit Dr. Pepper all over the floor.

That's all the left does! Look at Pocahontas at the beginning of the clip. All they do is scream "People Will Die!!!!". They are emotional train wrecks who lack the reason, logic, and intellect to examine things rationally.

unlike the right wing; who merely resort to right wing fantasy instead of facts.

have you ever noticed he melts down whenever he's called on his insane lying garbage?

Awe..........you 2 look like you should have a hug

 

[eagle1462010]

Don't leave your money laying around this communist bimbo..............she'll steal it..............

Should fit in well with the class of losers in the Democratic Party.

 

[P@triot]

have you ever noticed he melts down whenever he's called on his insane lying garbage?

Have you ever noticed that I've never "melted down"? I merely point out your hysteria. Which you just did again by claiming that a funny post illustrating your hysteria was "melting down".

 

[JoeB131]

Because the U.S. Constitution dictates that we can tax to enforce the law. However, it is unconstitutional to tax for anything outside of the 18 enumerated powers and “social services” are not one of the 18 enumerated powers.

Poodle, no one is buying your crazy here.

The government does services we want it to do, even those not thought of by Slave Rapists who shit in Chamber Pots.

 

[JoeB131]

/----/ We ran small businesses in small towns, none of our employees would have the wherewithal to have a resume much less use a service like yours.

Well, done, der Cleetus, that's a good point, I'm sure when everyone is related in a family tree that doesn't fork, you don't need you no dun der ra-zu-meesss...

You clearly don't know what you're talking about when it comes to blue collar workers and businesses who hire people who walk in off the street.

Uh, guy, any job that's worth having, you need a resume for..

 

[Cellblock2429]

/----/ We ran small businesses in small towns, none of our employees would have the wherewithal to have a resume much less use a service like yours.

Well, done, der Cleetus, that's a good point, I'm sure when everyone is related in a family tree that doesn't fork, you don't need you no dun der ra-zu-meesss...

You clearly don't know what you're talking about when it comes to blue collar workers and businesses who hire people who walk in off the street.

Uh, guy, any job that's worth having, you need a resume for..

/——/ So? I’m not disagreeing with either of you. I’m explaining what happened to us. BTW my small town had s population of 50,000 so we were not all related you doofus.

 

[JoeB131]

So? I’m not disagreeing with either of you. I’m explaining what happened to us. BTW my small town had s population of 50,000 so we were not all related you doofus.

Sorry, then, it sounds more and more to me like you don't run anything all that worthwhile down there in Hooterville.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Have you seen Kelli's appearance on the Family Feud show? I am surprised that her family didn't try to strangle her at the end.



God bless you and Kelli and her family always!!!

Holly

 

[Harry Dresden]

the following Sanders picked up was from the younger generation - thats the sign of things to come in this countrys political arena.

When the youth movement finally takes over RW idiots will really have something to whine about.

left wing idiots might also have something to whine about......

 

[skews13]

We could be lowering our Tax burden by simplifying public policies.

A better way to say that is “we could lower our tax burden by eliminating unconstitutional government”.

the common defense and general welfare, not the common offense and general warfare.

You’re calling defense “warfare” simply because you don’t like it. Oh well. Too bad. It’s still defense. And the “general welfare” applies within the 18 enumerated powers only.

And defense does not imply a standing Army. Obviously history of the Framers stance on that subject is weak at best and non existent at worst.

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 1 PARAGRAPH 1

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 8 PARAGRAPH 1 & 18

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Congress has the legislative power to create any office by legislation, including all social services departments, and collect the taxes to pay for them.

A Constitutional scholar you're not either.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Typical...a left-wing minion is forced to come face-to-face with the left-wing lie and instead attempts to hijack and redirect the thread.

Communism is socialism, you uneducated little dimwit. Two sides of the exact same coin. Now about the hypocrisy of the people you bow down to and worship?

As an ideology, communism is generally regarded as hard-left, making fewer concessions to market capitalism and electoral democracy than do most forms of socialism. As a system of government, communism tends to center on a one-party state that bans most forms of political dissent. These two usages of the term "communism" – one referring to theory, the other to politics as they are practiced – need not overlap: China's ruling Communist Party has an explicitly pro-market capitalist orientation and pays only lip service to the Maoist ideology whose purist adherents (Peru's Shining Path in its heyday, for example) regard Chinese authorities as bourgeois counterrevolutionaries.

Socialism can refer to a vast swath of the political spectrum, in theory and in practice. Its intellectual history is more varied than that of communism: the Communist Manifesto devotes a chapter to criticizing the half-dozen forms of socialism already in existence at the time, and proponents have taken just about every left-of-center stance on the ideal (or best achievable) structure of economic and political systems.


bite me, moron

Over taxation and excessive spending are two of the current consequences of European socialism.

Socialism even in moderate 'pick and choose' forms requires a massive government infrastructure to control centers of national manufacturing, healthcare, education, and internal security forces. Not to mention spending to subsidize a large percentage of its population for guaranteed housing, food programs, etc. I don't know about you but surrendering means of manufacturing to the government seems like big risk.

And even if an American socialism was to follow the European model of state regulation of industry versus outright ownership, you're still throwing your economic fate solely in the hands of bureaucrats vulnerable to whim and fancy, only their greed now expands across all means of production.

The step to communism from socialism can be a very small one. Once government has become a monolithic owner of economic and industrial bases, citizens become very vulnerable to becoming market hostages of the State. Any form of mass resistance or take back of economical control by the people could result in suspension and then removal of individual rights and freedoms. Collectivism and group politics is a set of matches we Americans do not want to play with.

The step to communism from socialism can be a very small one. Once government has become a monolithic owner of economic and industrial bases, citizens become very vulnerable to becoming market hostages of the State.

This is what it is now. You can't possibly be that willfully ignorant.

Which is why she won, and why the people are going to take back control of their rights and freedoms.

Mass resistance is the right of the people. Ever read the Constitution dimwit?

Who do you think the Framers intended to endow our freedoms to? Walmart, Amazon, Exxon Mobil?

If you do, then you thought wrong. The Framers saw those corporations as the very definition of tyranny. That, and a standing Army. Which is why Jefferson cut the standing Army to a third of what it was after he took office.

You need some serious education on just what America is son.

And you need to wade back out of the waters of historic Socialist murk. Tell me, do you believe the People under a successful socialist revolutionary vanguard control the government, its means of production and its economy? If you do, then you must admit card carrying membership status in the socialist care bear scouts of America. We know what you champion, and the lies told historically to get the working class and peasantry on board. There will be no socio-communista revolution in America--bloodless, cultural or otherwise.

You would compare our Founders to the Soviet Bolsheviks? Are you identifying yourself as the enemy of your nation?

let's try to focus on who the enemy of our nation is right now.... vlad and his puppet Donald and anyone who supports them

Grab your gun sister...come and get us.

 

[Synthaholic]

Can't argue with all the threads being created about her. All by Republicans.

If Republicans weren't worried about her energy, and her inclusiveness, and her ability to unite and motivate people, they would ignore her.

It's fear. Maybe not so much fear of her, but what she represents: regular, charismatic people running and winning.

It's more like for the comic relief, but I will concede it's concerning that we have a swath of the population stupid enough to be hoodwinked by someone as ignorant as her.

Pretty disingenuous comment coming from someone whose Party includes Joe Barton, Blake Farenthold, Louie Gohmert, and Ted Yoho.

Saw her in an interview trying to explain her policies....she wasn't very sharp.

She;l get better. She’s a natural.

 

[Synthaholic]

Not what I said, but if you're incapable of arguing what I actually said, whatchagonnado?

It wouldn't be because they are female. It would be because they are the Democrat running against the Republican who is going to blindly support #AgentOrange.

Then why did you specifically cite women as the ones they would resonate with? They won't do the same with men?

Because I was responding to a post that said Republicans are afraid of Ocasio because she's a woman. I said she's going to have a lot of company.

Try to keep up.

And you specifically noted that those candidates might be attractive to Republican..... what for it...... WOMEN.

You could have just said Republicans in general, but didn't. You made a point to say women. Why?

Try to keep up.

Yes, because Republican women are more inclined to be disgusted by revelations that Trump was fucking a porn star while his wife was pregnant, and fucking a playboy model for a year while his wife was nursing his son.

Among many other things. OTOH, Republican men are dumbasses who only care about money and power.

Everyone knew Trump was a pig when they elected him. The "grab her by the pussy" tape didn't sway millions of women so why would they care about him sleeping with a porn star over a decade ago? Did all of Clinton's affairs harm him with women? He got reelected.

And yes, only Republican men care about money and power. Democrat men hate those things. Guess that's why all the Dems in Washington are powerful millionaires.

I wasn’t talking about Washington. I was talking about Republicans everywhere.

Republican women gave him some passes because they hated HRC. She’s out of the picture, and both these revelations came out after the election. Republican women don’t find that charming, and I’m betting that the actual followers of Jesus that are female will also abandon Trump once they’re alone in the booth. They want Democrats to check his authoritarian tendencies.

 

[Synthaholic]

Palin has pimples on her ass smarter than ocasio-cortez…….

Smell the Republican fear!

 

[Thinker101]

Palin has pimples on her ass smarter than ocasio-cortez…….

Smell the Republican fear!

Yeah, that's not fear, you must have stepped in something...are you in SF?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I doubt any big money will be finding it's way to the Socialists camps.....but it might start a spending war between Soros and liberal deep pockets.

Can you see Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, Target, Google, Starbucks, Hollywood and all the other DEEP LEFTIST pockets gettin together and going......

"Hey, you know let's support those Socialists because, you know, it's time we redistributed all our wealth.....yeah, we don't need it."

Sure, hold your breath

 

[LeeOnLido]

i wonder if Kelly can name at least one country that lies just north of the USA

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Palin has pimples on her ass smarter than ocasio-cortez…….

Smell the Republican fear!

Of Cortez's pimples ?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Can't argue with all the threads being created about her. All by Republicans.

If Republicans weren't worried about her energy, and her inclusiveness, and her ability to unite and motivate people, they would ignore her.

It's fear. Maybe not so much fear of her, but what she represents: regular, charismatic people running and winning.

It's more like for the comic relief, but I will concede it's concerning that we have a swath of the population stupid enough to be hoodwinked by someone as ignorant as her.

Pretty disingenuous comment coming from someone whose Party includes Joe Barton, Blake Farenthold, Louie Gohmert, and Ted Yoho.

Saw her in an interview trying to explain her policies....she wasn't very sharp.

She;l get better. She’s a natural.

And so are you....

A natural sucker.

Enjoy her while you can.....she'll soon be sleeping with Bernie.