bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,582
English please.You're just irrated, Colon
You sqauwk and people takes shots at your dumfuckery.
Once again Bidum fcked uo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
English please.You're just irrated, Colon
You sqauwk and people takes shots at your dumfuckery.
Once again Bidum fcked uo
Well, there we have it.....con-firmation that it's about race and gender with the Far Right.You just support it for....wait for it.....black woman
Dumbass, you're a feeble bitch
I sense sarcasm in that last part.Thank you for your well researched hatred and ignorance . It's a quality rarely seen in republicans.
This seems to be an MO...."go away"....as if this poster has the power to make people leave and wishes to silence others. And posts again and again and again about how they "don't care".Go away Irrated Colon.
Absolutely nobody cares.
I know I don't
She's going to be excellent. I believe she has more judicial experience than all the Republican Justices COMBINED. She will be the only Justice who has ever defended someone in court. She's the first Justice who served as a Public Defender.
Again, making it very clear that this is what you object to...and the ONLY thing you object to....her race and gender.Bbbuut she's a black woman
When that becomes the criteria it's an issue
My goodness....this is a very INCEL-like post.Fuck you and your unique perspective excuse
She just gave you two reasons.Name anything specific you disagree with
Interesting....to ask you to give legit and specific reasons why you object to Jackson in a thread about Jackson......you call it trolling.Dude stop trolling me
And it's telling how many on the Right object to her for those very same reasons.How are these not racist/sexist statements?
You are ascribing a point of view or set of values based on her skin color and the fact that she has a vagina
Again...."I don't care"......in how many posts in this thread so far? We've got it.............you object strictly based on Jackson's race and gender.You'll get over it Mr 237K posts.
If not? I don't care
When a black woman has to be twice as good to get half as much credit....you are probably very correct.A black woman? I'm shocked. Undoubtedly, the most qualified person in America for this job.
Unique how? Be specificShe will bring a unique perspective to the Supreme Court
A welcome addition
And you support strictly on race and gender. Your hypocrisy is amazing.Again...."I don't care"......in how many posts in this thread so far? We've got it.............you object strictly based on Jackson's race and gender.
"AA ratios"?Doubtful but AA ratios has to be met
She's been a Public Defender.................been a long time since that perspective has been on the Supreme Court.Unique how? Be specific
Not at all....I support on her law school history, her SCOTUS clerking, her already done vetting by the Senate when she was appointed to a Federal Bench. Her qualifications match Chief Justice Roberts, but with more Federal bench time.And you support strictly on race and gender. Your hypocrisy is amazing.
Now THIS ^ is trolling.Bish blah blah blah....and even more....blah
Unique how? Be specific
By "Trumper", you must mean anybody who does not march in lockstep with authoritarian leftist identity politics.I cannot lie, watching the Trumpers head explode over this pick is far more entertaining than it should be