Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No proof, just an appeal to authorities who have been caught lying and miking things up... Nice..
Guy, 95% of Climate Scientists... Um, no, you are the one who lacks evidence.
. They must be fake scientists!!
Gun grabbing and climate change..........check any poll.........at the very bottom of peoples list of concerns.
No proof, just an appeal to authorities who have been caught lying and miking things up... Nice..
Guy, 95% of Climate Scientists... Um, no, you are the one who lacks evidence.
That's a mere legend. The only thing that 95% of climate scientists agree on is that the Earth is warming and CO2 emissions may be PART of that warming. It does not answer the more important questions of feedbacks, accelerations and the other conjectures of GW that make a mild contribution into a fucking apocalypse. Also does not address the "common wisdom and folklore" of seeing definite effects of GW TODAY -- by just looking at your window. The DEFINITIVE opinion poll of scientists for over 12 years running are the Bray and von Storch surveys, that ask nearly ONE HUNDRED questions about GW. And the results there are FAR less scary and less of a consensus..
That's a mere legend. The only thing that 95% of climate scientists agree on is that the Earth is warming and CO2 emissions may be PART of that warming. It does not answer the more important questions of feedbacks, accelerations and the other conjectures of GW that make a mild contribution into a fucking apocalypse. Also does not address the "common wisdom and folklore" of seeing definite effects of GW TODAY -- by just looking at your window. The DEFINITIVE opinion poll of scientists for over 12 years running are the Bray and von Storch surveys, that ask nearly ONE HUNDRED questions about GW. And the results there are FAR less scary and less of a consensus..
Okay, guy, if 95% of doctors you see tell you that you are going to die if you don't change your lifestyle... do you really quibble whether or not he's giving you six months to live or two years to live?
Or do you say, "Holy, shit, Doc, I need to change my lifestyle!"
The problem with you deniers is that you don't want to change your lifestyle.. not that you understand the science or not.
Settled my ass.The question is simple and examinging it at that level is not demogoguery. Do you believe that the world is getting warmer and that the primary cause of that warming is human GHG emissions? Greater than 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists say yes to that question. Like it or not, that puts you and all your buddies here out of business. AGW is settled science.
The question is simple and examinging it at that level is not demogoguery. Do you believe that the world is getting warmer and that the primary cause of that warming is human GHG emissions? Greater than 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists say yes to that question. Like it or not, that puts you and all your buddies here out of business. AGW is settled science.
Am I baptized into the congregation now?
Settled my ass.
From NASA, lolSettled my ass.
These denialings are oh-so very smart. They even have piccies to show - no source, sadly - probably from some denialing blog to cater to even more denialings. If that doesn't prove - prove! - the hoaxterism of the climate hoax...
... they even resort to some internet meme generator piccies to show Al Gore for the non-scientific goof he sure is. As a welcome side-effect this also demonstrates, conclusively, that all "liberal news" are fake. And if that still doesn't suffice...
... they decry the consensus on AGW, including the "A" part, as trivial - no, make that "TRIVIAL" - because what could be more trivial than the earth's warming and the humans' part in it? There's even an eight-year old online poll with an 18% response rate destroying the "consensus" - a poll that had none of the respondents denying the warming, and next to no one (1.35%) denying the human impact.
Did I mention these denialings are smart? Very much so.
From NASA, lol
Okay, guy, if 95% of doctors you see tell you that you are going to die if you don't change your lifestyle... do you really quibble whether or not he's giving you six months to live or two years to live?
Or do you say, "Holy, shit, Doc, I need to change my lifestyle!"
The problem with you deniers is that you don't want to change your lifestyle.. not that you understand the science or not.
That makes them believe in him even more. The more you claim BS, and the more you are proven wrong, the more liberals want you to lead them. Where to, I have no idea.Poor Al Whore.. Sold himself to the dark side and not one of his predictions have come true...
That, that was fake news, right? Right?
What is fake is the quote. Gore did not say "will". He said "may well".
And I strongly suggest you do some more reading. You do not understand the concept of "fake news".
The current rate of change is not uncommon (different from) and not faster than that of the past changes... Your premise fails basic empirical evidence review..
we've never had temperatures increase as quickly as they are now... The fact you have to go back millions of years to find time periods when the poles had this little ice is evidence of that.
Prove your assumption!
Make sure the graphing you use to show this is in the same spatial resolution as the yearly plots are today... I'll wait..
95% of Climate scientists believe it's human caused.
The problem here isn't proof, bud. You guys don't WANT to believe that it's human caused, Because that would require government action to reverse.
The problem with your argument is that it is a chicken little, hand waving, emotional response to what you believe rather than a well thought out thoroughly researched assessment of what you have been told.
What government action? Carbon credits? A tax? Just which of these actions will alleviate what you think ails the planet? Want to know what's really going on? If our leaders and our celebrities ever actually start walking the walk, then you can worry. Until then, this is a "new world order" idea.
Mark
Here, take a look at a temperature reconstruction from the Greenland ice, covering not millions of years, but just the past 10,000 years.
Guy you can show me all the bullshit charts you want... from whatever denier websites the the Oil Companies are funding... but again, 95% of climate scientists- guys who know what htey are talking about - say you're wrong.
My doctor has been telling me for at least a decade that he wants to start me on statin drugs for my cholesterol...and had I shopped around, I am sure that at least 95% off the doctors I talked to would have agreed with him...I, however, kept pointing out that I had seen no clear evidence, and neither had he that high cholesterol had anything whatsoever to do with heart disease....
Recently the largest, longest study ever done came back stating that cholesterol had no clear connection to heart disease...now he would have willingly put me on a drug that I would probably have had to take for the rest of my life...based on no clear evidence whatsoever...as would most of the other doctors in the world...recently he apologized and said that he would not be recommending statin drugs to his patients.
Prove your assumption!
Make sure the graphing you use to show this is in the same spatial resolution as the yearly plots are today... I'll wait..
95% of Climate scientists believe it's human caused.
The problem here isn't proof, bud. You guys don't WANT to believe that it's human caused, Because that would require government action to reverse.
The problem with your argument is that it is a chicken little, hand waving, emotional response to what you believe rather than a well thought out thoroughly researched assessment of what you have been told.
What government action? Carbon credits? A tax? Just which of these actions will alleviate what you think ails the planet? Want to know what's really going on? If our leaders and our celebrities ever actually start walking the walk, then you can worry. Until then, this is a "new world order" idea.
Mark
Here, take a look at a temperature reconstruction from the Greenland ice, covering not millions of years, but just the past 10,000 years.
Guy you can show me all the bullshit charts you want... from whatever denier websites the the Oil Companies are funding... but again, 95% of climate scientists- guys who know what htey are talking about - say you're wrong.
Guy you can show me all the bullshit charts you want... from whatever denier websites the the Oil Companies are funding... but again, 95% of climate scientists- guys who know what htey are talking about - say you're wrong.
lolMy doctor has been telling me for at least a decade that he wants to start me on statin drugs for my cholesterol...and had I shopped around, I am sure that at least 95% off the doctors I talked to would have agreed with him...I, however, kept pointing out that I had seen no clear evidence, and neither had he that high cholesterol had anything whatsoever to do with heart disease....
Recently the largest, longest study ever done came back stating that cholesterol had no clear connection to heart disease...now he would have willingly put me on a drug that I would probably have had to take for the rest of my life...based on no clear evidence whatsoever...as would most of the other doctors in the world...recently he apologized and said that he would not be recommending statin drugs to his patients.
For laughing out loud.
Yes, there's an out-of-the-mainsteam study claiming that cholesterol has nothing to do with heart disease. That does not in and of itself a reversal of science create, even though we may be seeing the beginnings of one. Be that as it may, it may well have been a wise decision to stay clear of statins.
However, your willful confusion of Big Pharma pushing statins - bamboozling regulators, and defrauding patients in order to help their bottom line - with "science" is just too funny for words. The other way round: We have all kinds of oily corporate interests pushing the "climate hoax" to help their bottom line, and they stand against science in the exact same way as Big Pharma did, pushing their profitable statin hoax. As we know, and in both cases, the profit seekers experienced no dearth of useful idiots peddling the faux science on behalf of their corporate overlords, gleefully so.
So yeah, you found a sore thumb sticking out, but while whacking away at it, you should by now have discovered it is your own.
Prove your assumption!
Make sure the graphing you use to show this is in the same spatial resolution as the yearly plots are today... I'll wait..
95% of Climate scientists believe it's human caused.
The problem here isn't proof, bud. You guys don't WANT to believe that it's human caused, Because that would require government action to reverse.
The problem with your argument is that it is a chicken little, hand waving, emotional response to what you believe rather than a well thought out thoroughly researched assessment of what you have been told.
What government action? Carbon credits? A tax? Just which of these actions will alleviate what you think ails the planet? Want to know what's really going on? If our leaders and our celebrities ever actually start walking the walk, then you can worry. Until then, this is a "new world order" idea.
Mark
Here, take a look at a temperature reconstruction from the Greenland ice, covering not millions of years, but just the past 10,000 years.
Guy you can show me all the bullshit charts you want... from whatever denier websites the the Oil Companies are funding... but again, 95% of climate scientists- guys who know what htey are talking about - say you're wrong.
You Really should learn how to use the "quote" function.. Adding your words to my post inside the quotes is not cool..
Guy you can show me all the bullshit charts you want... from whatever denier websites the the Oil Companies are funding... but again, 95% of climate scientists- guys who know what htey are talking about - say you're wrong.
I see the bull shit runs deep in you.... Evil oil lies and the 97% LIE lives in you... Both of which have been shown frauds and deceptions by your left wing fools..
Ask nicely. You might even throw in a pretty please for good measure.From NASA, lol
Nice giggle. But how about a link?
There is no conspiracy here. The world we live in is considered an icehouse world. You think it is normal, but it is not. It is rare, possibly unique. Our icehouse world is characterized by bipolar glaciation and high latitudinal thermal gradients. No other instance of bipolar glaciation is known through the geologic record. For the last 400,000 years we have been experiencing glacial-interglacial cycles. Interglacial cycles have low latitude thermal gradients. We are presently in an interglacial cycle. Due to our landmass distribution which isolates the poles from warm marine currents, warming will occur more in the northern hemisphere than it will in the southern hemisphere. Which is exactly what we are seeing now. It is all natural and will continue to happen as we are at least 1.4C to 2.4C below the peak temperatures of three of the four past interglacials. Now you know.My doctor has been telling me for at least a decade that he wants to start me on statin drugs for my cholesterol...and had I shopped around, I am sure that at least 95% off the doctors I talked to would have agreed with him...I, however, kept pointing out that I had seen no clear evidence, and neither had he that high cholesterol had anything whatsoever to do with heart disease....
Recently the largest, longest study ever done came back stating that cholesterol had no clear connection to heart disease...now he would have willingly put me on a drug that I would probably have had to take for the rest of my life...based on no clear evidence whatsoever...as would most of the other doctors in the world...recently he apologized and said that he would not be recommending statin drugs to his patients.
For laughing out loud.
Yes, there's an out-of-the-mainsteam study claiming that cholesterol has nothing to do with heart disease. That does not in and of itself a reversal of science create, even though we may be seeing the beginnings of one. Be that as it may, it may well have been a wise decision to stay clear of statins.
However, your willful confusion of Big Pharma pushing statins - bamboozling regulators, and defrauding patients in order to help their bottom line - with "science" is just too funny for words. The other way round: We have all kinds of oily corporate interests pushing the "climate hoax" to help their bottom line, and they stand against science in the exact same way as Big Pharma did, pushing their profitable statin hoax. As we know, and in both cases, the profit seekers experienced no dearth of useful idiots peddling the faux science on behalf of their corporate overlords, gleefully so.
So yeah, you found a sore thumb sticking out, but while whacking away at it, you should by now have discovered it is your own.
