Men-Pretending-To-Be-Women DOJ Lawsuits & School Decrees Just Got Hamstrung: Judge Warns Lynch

[Silhouette]

Exactly. The pervs on this thread are, as usual, trying to promote LGBT sex and a thousand other strawmen while the actual topic focuses on the clarification issue that Loretta Lynch is going to have to grapple with.

And...more importantly...grapple with while she is now under a court Order from the 5th circuit to be scrupulously honest and not mislead the public. That's why I keep asking the LGBT cult drones here "what EXACTLY is a transgender woman"? (& how does that apply to the 1964 Civil Rights Act & Title IX) And none of them will answer. But Loretta Lynch HAS to. And because of the court Order from the judge, she HAS to without misleading the public or any court.

Worse still, her most uber-left champion on the USSC, Justice Ginsburg, has already said that that the equality in the 1964 Civil Rights Act does not apply to sex segregated bathrooms, showers etc. And Ginsburg didn't just mention that in passing; she asserted it emphatically. She said it as a reassurance to the public "this won't go too far or get too weird, I PROMISE you".

And, here we are today... and now Ginsburg's sitting on the very Bench that Lynch will be pitching her bullshit arguments to, while trying not to get held in contempt of court. This should be intersting to watch.. Between Ginsburg, North Carolina and that judge in Texas, they've got Lynch pinned deep in a corner in a box canyon. And I'll be honest here....I love watching evil lawyers struggle in tangled webs they've woven.

TL;DR

The judge is a total wingnut and this won't stand.

Next...

The judge is a judge and he issued a court Order. Do you want him to hold YOU in contempt of court too? Since when does your cult get to decide who sits on the bench even? Let me guess...Rachael Maddow's gestapo is going to hunt down dirt on that judge, have 1,000 of you drones write some commission in charge of him being on the bench, and then magically his career will be over.

With laser-targeted precision...just like all the GOP governors she's brought down who were duly elected by their state...bringing most of them down for bullshit infractions she trumped up until the faction of the army in that governor's state rattled the right cages and got him dethroned. Her type of sedition is coming to a quick end if conservatives are clever enough to get this election. "Brazen" is a word I think of as I watch her use her laser to destroy career after career of people who voice any opposition to the LGBT Agenda..

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Time to get over your fear of others.

It's childish.

People are going to have to level with that boy on the verge of puberty that his extreme thickening eyebrows, squaring jaw, large teeth, large nose and emerging 5 Oclock shadow and crotch bulge that he's not a girl.

And never will be...

She has it right, a girl brain in a boy body. And that problem will be fixed soon enough.

He also constantly whines that boys won't date him because they know hes a boy in a dress and they don't want to be homosexual. Sad

I would say that these boys will be vilified by their peers.

Aren't these the same boys who are supposed to be tolerant and accepting of the modern contemporary society.

 

[Silhouette]

I would say that these boys will be vilified by their peers.

Aren't these the same boys who are supposed to be tolerant and accepting of the modern contemporary society.

Well you just defined the problem with PC-force. People in public venues where they know eyes are upon them will profess support for this type of madness if they think the herd is going along. But when the rubber is required to meet the road, they say "are you kidding? Date a dude in a dress? Are you out of your mind?!"

That's where a policy of delusional thinking gets in the way of functionality for this poor boy that the mother wanted so very badly to be a girl after having two boys before him. I read the bio early on when I first saw this kid posted on the net...he was around 5, sitting in a pink bedroom with $100 makeup job, in a dress. No parental coercion there at all. Early on this boy figured out, 'if I want to stand out and be special to mommy, I need to be a girl'. The woman admitted after her first two boys she was desperate for a girl. You probably can't find THAT part of the story on the net anywhere now. GLAAD probably had it removed. Only mommy explained it away as "from the earliest of ages, when "Jazz" could barely talk, he said he wanted to be a girl!" Wow! What a miracle that was because it was exactly what that mother had been subconsciously longing for since before that boy was born. Suppose there's a correlation?

But instead of putting the MOTHER on the psychiatrist's couch, they're going to drug a child and push him towards butchering his body to become yet another, sad, disabled halfling freak that no other boys or girls want to date or be around. The cult of LGBT is USING this CHILD in a most grotesque way and advocating abuse of him, so they can sell their ever-weirder cult values to the American public in their current, active "culture war" against decency and basic moral structure and common sense.

 

[Tilly]

I'm with this guy.

Trans activists are effectively experimenting on children. Could there be anything more cruel?
Brendan O'Neill
.....
The treatment of non-conforming or plain funny kids as ‘transgender’ strikes me as a stunning abdication of adult responsibility. It is the job of adults to correct childish confusions, to guide kids through weird or rough patches, and ensure, to the best of our abilities, that they come out the other end as rounded, hopefully happy adults. But now, the cult of relativism runs so deep that adults even balk from making that most basic of all judgements – that a child with a penis is a boy and a child with a vagina is a girl – and instead we accommodate to the child’s own fads and silliness.

What about children who want to be dogs, or dinosaurs, or racing car drivers? Should we indulge them? ‘Transgender kids’ aren’t at fault at all here – the problem is an adult society that has so profoundly lost the plot that it can no longer steer and socialise the next generation, and can’t even bring itself to say ‘boys will be boys and girls will be girls’ because to do so in our Queer Studies-saturated era is apparently to be discriminatory, judgemental, oppressive.

There’s one more, seriously dark element to the promotion of the ‘trans kids’ phenomenon: it’s being pushed by adult trans activists as a way of pursuing their own interests and agenda. More and more trans campaigners are using ‘trans kids’ effectively as a moral shield, hoping that if they can convince the world that transgenderism is something that emerges as early as three or four then it must be natural, good, healthy, and thus should be insulated from criticism.

That is, they’re effectively experimenting on children, both socially and medically, both through filling kids’ heads with nonsense about dysphoria and offering them drugs, in order to advance their own adult demands for greater recognition. This is repulsive, the creation of a new generation of castratos who are paraded and praised in public by self-serving trans activists who only want more political clout and respect. Stop it. Let kids be kids. A boy who plays with dolls is not trans or dysphoric – he’s just a boy who plays with dolls.

Trans activists are effectively experimenting on children. Could there be anything more cruel? | Coffee House

 

[Manonthestreet]

The bizarre events surrounding the bathroom battle between the state of North Carolina and the United States have the whiff of Sarajevo in 1914. Who knew Europe would collapse into the first world war in human history over the assassination of an obscure archduke? Will an obscure fight over bathroom use by transgenders in North Carolina be viewed in the rear window of history as the event that set off the looming war between the American people and their own government?Blog: The revolution is being televised: Bathroom wars continue

 

[depotoo]

With the threat of funds being withdrawn? No, they won't.

Your own link says otherwise. Please point to any other requirement than verbalization: doctor's care, hormones, appearance, anything other than the word of the individual. I've looked and can't find it. Your link says if a student verbalizes his feeling like a girl, the school must allow him into the girls' facilities. Surely there has been a doctor visit before this point, no?

Common sense says the school is not going to make this happen because on Tuesday they claim to be female all of a sudden. Won't happen.

Then you shouldn't object to getting that in writing. The writing that exists now says it MUST happen. It specifically states that there are NO other requirements and the schools MUST comply on verbalization ONLY, under threats of federal sanctions. The schools cannot just "not make this happen."

I know you people have no common sense but most do. This is not about boys or girls playing dress-up for a day.

The law states the school MUST allow access to opposite facilities. There is no common sense involved or allowed. That is the whole of my problem. Your position is that schools will violate the law and lose federal monies because it is just common sense. There is no point continuing because your position (just break the law) and mine (fix the law to add requirement of some form of proof) are incompatible. Fixing the law is just common sense, but you object. It makes me suspect your motives.

The schools are going to comply, using common sense.

 

[Silhouette]

The bizarre events surrounding the bathroom battle between the state of North Carolina and the United States have the whiff of Sarajevo in 1914. Who knew Europe would collapse into the first world war in human history over the assassination of an obscure archduke? Will an obscure fight over bathroom use by transgenders in North Carolina be viewed in the rear window of history as the event that set off the looming war between the American people and their own government?Blog: The revolution is being televised: Bathroom wars continue

Depends on how far the judges and Justices allow Loretta Lynch go with lying about real objective reality. She's under a court order you know to no longer deceive any court or the American Public in general in her legal filings & arguments.

I think we're going to get rescued by sanity in the nick of time. Send your cards and letters of thanks to the judge in Texas and the 5th circuit.

 

[Dhara]

We expect parents of transchildren to be wiser than Solomon. No parent wants their kid to suffer if they don't have to. Hormones and surgery are what some want, but it isn't the answer for kids with gender dysphoria.

Some eloquently assert that they will never be cisgender, (cisgender means comfortable in the gender body you've been born in) regardless of whether they take hormones or not.

This individual has made 3 youtube videos and he/she is quite wise.

 

[Dhara]

Here is another with a response to the above video:

 

[Dhara]

The above video responds to the prior video. 2 trans kids talking to each other, one has body dysphoria, one does not.

 

[Dhara]

Advice to parents from a transgender youth:

 

[Dhara]

Here is a mother/trans son dialogue on transgender situation

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The bizarre events surrounding the bathroom battle between the state of North Carolina and the United States have the whiff of Sarajevo in 1914. Who knew Europe would collapse into the first world war in human history over the assassination of an obscure archduke? Will an obscure fight over bathroom use by transgenders in North Carolina be viewed in the rear window of history as the event that set off the looming war between the American people and their own government?Blog: The revolution is being televised: Bathroom wars continue

Depends on how far the judges and Justices allow Loretta Lynch go with lying about real objective reality. She's under a court order you know to no longer deceive any court or the American Public in general in her legal filings & arguments.

I think we're going to get rescued by sanity in the nick of time. Send your cards and letters of thanks to the judge in Texas and the 5th circuit.

Your ignorance is exceeded only by your hate.

Laws seeking to disadvantage transgender Americans are as wrong and as un-Constitutional as those which sought to disadvantage gay Americans, and will likewise be in validated.

 

[Dhara]

 

[Wyatt earp]

The bizarre events surrounding the bathroom battle between the state of North Carolina and the United States have the whiff of Sarajevo in 1914. Who knew Europe would collapse into the first world war in human history over the assassination of an obscure archduke? Will an obscure fight over bathroom use by transgenders in North Carolina be viewed in the rear window of history as the event that set off the looming war between the American people and their own government?Blog: The revolution is being televised: Bathroom wars continue

Depends on how far the judges and Justices allow Loretta Lynch go with lying about real objective reality. She's under a court order you know to no longer deceive any court or the American Public in general in her legal filings & arguments.

I think we're going to get rescued by sanity in the nick of time. Send your cards and letters of thanks to the judge in Texas and the 5th circuit.

Your ignorance is exceeded only by your hate.

Laws seeking to disadvantage transgender Americans are as wrong and as un-Constitutional as those which sought to disadvantage gay Americans, and will likewise be in validated.

That is a fallacy...

This time it violates women and little girls rights to privacy from pervs like you.


.

 

[Dhara]

I will counter the idea that parents of trans kid are abusive to them and show that having the wisdom to help your own child in the immediacy of his/her own situation requires great love, compassion and wisdom,

AND is not abuse.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Like Tom boys are a New concept

Stupid retarded parents.


.

 

[Dhara]

I'm with this guy.

Trans activists are effectively experimenting on children. Could there be anything more cruel?
Brendan O'Neill
.....
The treatment of non-conforming or plain funny kids as ‘transgender’ strikes me as a stunning abdication of adult responsibility. It is the job of adults to correct childish confusions, to guide kids through weird or rough patches, and ensure, to the best of our abilities, that they come out the other end as rounded, hopefully happy adults. But now, the cult of relativism runs so deep that adults even balk from making that most basic of all judgements – that a child with a penis is a boy and a child with a vagina is a girl – and instead we accommodate to the child’s own fads and silliness.

What about children who want to be dogs, or dinosaurs, or racing car drivers? Should we indulge them? ‘Transgender kids’ aren’t at fault at all here – the problem is an adult society that has so profoundly lost the plot that it can no longer steer and socialise the next generation, and can’t even bring itself to say ‘boys will be boys and girls will be girls’ because to do so in our Queer Studies-saturated era is apparently to be discriminatory, judgemental, oppressive.

There’s one more, seriously dark element to the promotion of the ‘trans kids’ phenomenon: it’s being pushed by adult trans activists as a way of pursuing their own interests and agenda. More and more trans campaigners are using ‘trans kids’ effectively as a moral shield, hoping that if they can convince the world that transgenderism is something that emerges as early as three or four then it must be natural, good, healthy, and thus should be insulated from criticism.

That is, they’re effectively experimenting on children, both socially and medically, both through filling kids’ heads with nonsense about dysphoria and offering them drugs, in order to advance their own adult demands for greater recognition. This is repulsive, the creation of a new generation of castratos who are paraded and praised in public by self-serving trans activists who only want more political clout and respect. Stop it. Let kids be kids. A boy who plays with dolls is not trans or dysphoric – he’s just a boy who plays with dolls.

Trans activists are effectively experimenting on children. Could there be anything more cruel? | Coffee House

Hateful. Completely hateful. Have your own trans kid and see what you say then, bigot.

 

[Silhouette]

Trans activists are effectively experimenting on children. Could there be anything more cruel? | Coffee House

Hateful. Completely hateful. Have your own trans kid and see what you say then, bigot.

If I had a "trans kid" ( a kid pretending to be the opposite gender) I'd have him on a therapist's couch and would explore the entire family and our influence over him in group therapy to discover the true reason he's rejecting his gender or trying to be the other gender to get attention.

I'd have myself analyzed first before I assented to drugging him with non-FDA approved drug therapies and nudging him towards butchering himself into a mutilated halfling, still just as fucked up as before he started therapy. A good parent would look at EVERYTHING that could be contributing to this child's delusions. No matter how hard it was to do.

You don't have the luxury, BTW, to label an opposing opinion to blatant child abuse as "hateful". People are required by law to notice child abuse when it is sitting right in front of their face, and to report it to authorities, and to testify as a witness to it, if necessary. To fail to do so is against the law.

 

[hazlnut]

Men-pretending-to-be-women (identical meaning to "transgender" for purposes of clarity and legal definition), just got nudged back from the door with the sign "women" on it.....let me explain.

Just recently, a federal judge Ordered Loretta Lynch's DOJ lawyers either stripped of their bar standing across state lines, or to take remedial legal ethics classes. The reason? The judge found, as well as other courts found, that Lynch's DOJ has be purposefully misleading the courts and the American public about law and legal practice in their various endeavors. The judge also sent a warning to Lynch that any future misleading will not be tolerated: 179125570172

"This Order is tailored to give the 26 Plaintiff States some avenue for relief from the possibility of any damage that may result from the misconduct of the Defendants’ lawyers and to prevent future harm to any Plaintiff State due to the Government’s misrepresentations. The Court also enters this Order to deter and prevent future misconduct by Justice Department lawyers by ordering an appropriately tailored continuing legal education program, which will not only serve to educate the uninitiated, but more importantly will remind all trial lawyers that their honest and ethical participation is a necessity for the proper administration of justice. It also compels the Attorney General, or her designee, to take the necessary steps to ensure that DOJ attorneys act honestly in the future."

And the footnote just below that paragraph (all near the end of the Order from the link above)

18 Other courts have noticed these problems as well. Just in the last six months, both the Fifth Circuit and the Sixth Circuit have questioned the conduct of those employed by the Department of Justice. United States v. Bowen, 799 F.3d 336 (5th Cir. 2015); In re United States, No. 15-3793, 2016 WL 1105077 (6th Cir. Mar. 22, 2016). The Fifth Circuit went further and suggested that not only was there misleading conduct, but the conduct was followed by an inadequate investigation and a cover-up. These are just two of an ever-growing number of opinions that demonstrate the lack of ethical awareness and/or compliance by some at the Department of Justice.

And further..

The Court does not have the power to disbar the counsel in this case, but it does have the power to revoke the pro hac vice status of out-of-state lawyers who act unethically in court. By a separate sealed order that it is simultaneously issuing, that is being done...The Court cannot help but hope that the new Attorney General, being a former United States Attorney, would also believe strongly that it is the duty of DOJ attorneys to act honestly in all of their dealings with a court, with opposing counsel and with the American people....

\

It's that last bit that creates the snag for men-pretending-to-be-women (transgender). In the DOJ's recent bullying of public schools to allow boys to shower with girls or face withdrawel of federal education funds, Lynch cited improperly (she's a lawyer, she knows how to read), Title IX of the education code. That is intentional misleading of the public. Nowhere in Title IX does it talk about males pretending to be females:

******* Overview Of Title IX Of The Education Amendments Of 1972, 20 U.S.C. A§ 1681 Et. Seq. | CRT | Department of Justice
On June 23, 1972, the President signed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq., into law. Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices. Title IX applies, with a few specific exceptions, to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities. In addition to traditional educational institutions such as colleges, universities, and elementary and secondary schools, Title IX also applies to any education or training program operated by a recipient of federal financial assistance. The Department of Education has issued regulations on the requirements of Title IX, 34 C.F.R. § 106.1et seq. The Title IX common rule published on August 30, 2000 covers education program providers/recipients that are funded by other federal agencies.

********
Do you see anything about males pretending to be females? Neither do I. What's worse for Lynch is that Justice Ginsburg already spoke and clarified Title IX with exact respect to segregated bathrooms (and obviously showers, locker rooms etc.) marked "women" (or "men") outside:

“Separate places to disrobe, sleep, perform personal bodily functions are permitted, in some situations required, by regard for individual privacy,” she wrote in a 1975 commentary printed by the Washington Post....“Individual privacy, a right of constitutional dimension, is appropriately harmonized with the equality principle,” she wrote.....The author?....Ruth Ginsburg, now on the bench of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Lynch representing to the American public that Title IX covers boys-pretending-to-be-girls (transgender) is intentional deception of the Pubic.

But it gets worse. Lynch's threats to schools were more veiled,not direct. Her threats to North Carolina came with punch and promise...and a separate suit filed by her Office against NC. In the suit, it's entire hinge & premise relies on Lynch's purposefully false interpretation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In it Lynch claims that the Act covers men-pretending-to-be-women "as a protected class". NOWHERE in the US Constitution nor the 1964 Civil Rights Act does it even remotely insinuate, much less say men-pretending-to-be-women are a "protected class".

What the DOJ is up to is using "incremental subterfuge from below". And that's going to come out in the future in a big way in other LGBT legal advances. Only Congress can create specific language to add or remove from the US Constitution. Judges are not allowed to add extra and new language to the Constitution. The purpose of the Highest Court of Appeal, the USSC, is to INTERPRET the Constitution against legal challenges from below that come before it. What the USSC in collusion with lower courts has done, is to create a Trojan Horse of ghost-writing new terms to the Constitution's 14th Amendment...each blaming the other for "the ultimate source of the findings/interpretation" (new law not written/ratified by Congress). Lynch looks to a lower court ruling in violation of the Constitution (because men-pretending-to-be-women are to be found not even remotely insinuated in the Constitution as "protected") to justify her lawsuit against North Carolina. She should know better. And in fact I argue she DOES know better. She is pushing it, and it's something the judge warned her not to do.

So, wisely, North Carolina asks Lynch in its own lawsuit to clarify what her department means by "transgenders having rights" (men-pretending-to-be-women having "rights"). Lynch now on her heels and scrambling, must HONESTLY and with ethical intent, define to the American public, and particularly North Carlolina how it is that the 1964 Civil Rights Act covers a behavior and not a static thing like sex or race. NC attorneys (and Lynch) knows she can't do that. Because if one odd behavior like men-pretending-to-be-women (transgenders) has protected status from the majority regulation, which other odd behaviors the majority objects to do not?

Lynch knows she's backed into a corner on the clarification issue. And now she has a court Order warning her not to deceive the public further...or else...

If I were Lynch, and wanted to keep my job, I would very meekly retract my veiled threats to public school boards across the country...and...I'd retract my lawsuit against NC. She is heading into a box canyon and there is literally no way out for her unless she very quickly retraces her steps.

Remember on the men-pretending-to-be-women (transgender) issue with bathrooms, showers etc., there's a real, actual static class protected by the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Ginsburg subsequent statement: the 17 million women rape survivors who would be plunged into PTSD the instant they saw a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman standing naked next to them in the showers behind a door marked "women"... These people ACTUALLY DO have Constitutional protection. Men-pretending-to-be-women DO NOT.

The USSC is NOT allowed to interpret lower court rulings that mislead the Public about the actual wording of the Congress-ratified 14th Amendment. And, last time I checked, the USSC Justices are also required to be in good standing with the bar in order to continue their jobs..

You are a trans-American or a human piece of shit pretending to be an American Citizen.

Can we please flush the homophobes off this board.