Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for BillaryFor rosie's edificationTrue you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
ommfgNOPE! That's not true....the legal maximum contribution per election cycle is around $3000.....Trump can NOT give a million dollar to Hillary.....Trump can give his own money to anyone at any time, before, during or after any election. Trump can even give Hillary a million to run again...Did he declare it as a political contribution?Not even sure what that means.
So you don't understand campaign finance laws and "direct" v. "in kind contributions". Well that explains it.
.>>>>
lol
Call in Hitlers thread policeLOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for BillaryFor rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
seems to me republican cowards make all posts about hillary or obama they have nothing else Supporting a swine like Trump will do that to youLOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for BillaryFor rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
Quote Hillary taking the money from Russia or you admit you’re full of shit. Which is it?Kid Hillary admitted taking the money. What planet r u on anywayWTF is wrong with you imbeciles?? There’s nothing in that article that claims Russia gave Hillary almost $145 million.And almost all of that $145 million came from a Canadian, not from Russia. @Rosy’s an idiot who actually trolls her own threads.For rosie's edificationTrue you are turning a blind eye to the 150 million that Putin donated to Hillaries charity
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
...dumbass.
https://nypost.com/2017/10/17/fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-controversial-nuclear-deal/
Don’t you think it would be wise, if you’re going to call someone a “dumbass” and post a link to demonstrate the reason for such invective — that your link should at least mention the cause of your protest?
Seems to me that u r embarrassed by both hillypoopoo and obooba bothseems to me republican cowards make all posts about hillary or obama they have nothing else Supporting a swine like Trump will do that to youLOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
Cohen sued because the Dossier stated he was in Prague, to guide the Russians on how to pay off the Hackers of the DNC emails, without leaving a paper trail..... he was the FIXER.Fucking imbecile... Cohen is also connected to the Steele dossier.Being disbarred is the least of what Cohen is facing.
I don't think John Dean ever practiced law again.
How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??
Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Read my fucking post or get someone to read it for you! I have never seen anyone grace this forum who is as stupid as you!
I'll put it in big letters so you can read it without your coke-bottle glasses!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
How come you flat out refuse to cite any source other than yourself about that $150 million?Why are you so adverse to the person you voted for?LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for BillaryFor rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
130 grand vs 150 million, from Putin no less
130How come you flat out refuse to cite any source other than yourself?Why are you so adverse to the person you voted for?LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
130 grand vs 150 million, from Putin no less
Why would the Russians pay off themselvesCohen sued because the Dossier stated he was in Prague, to guide the Russians on how to pay off the Hackers of the DNC emails, without leaving a paper trail..... he was the FIXER.Fucking imbecile... Cohen is also connected to the Steele dossier.How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??
Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Read my fucking post or get someone to read it for you! I have never seen anyone grace this forum who is as stupid as you!
I'll put it in big letters so you can read it without your coke-bottle glasses!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Cohen claimed he was not there....
But he dropped the suit....right after it was reported in the news that the special counsel investigators allegedly found out HE WAS THERE in Prague....
maybe it is not connected, to the article released that says he was there?
but the timing appears like it was connected?
Why?
seems to me republican cowards make all posts about hillary or obama they have nothing else Supporting a swine like Trump will do that to youLOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
He can be compelled to Plead the 5th,Funny though, not one news outlet is reporting this including FOX...………………
Cohen can not even mention Trump without being disbarred.
Not exactly. If Cohen was a coconspirator with Trump in illegal activities, he can be compelled to testify.
Cohen sued because the Dossier stated he was in Prague, to guide the Russians on how to pay off the Hackers of the DNC emails, without leaving a paper trail..... he was the FIXER.Fucking imbecile... Cohen is also connected to the Steele dossier.How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??
Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Read my fucking post or get someone to read it for you! I have never seen anyone grace this forum who is as stupid as you!
I'll put it in big letters so you can read it without your coke-bottle glasses!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Cohen claimed he was not there....
But he dropped the suit....right after it was reported in the news that the special counsel investigators allegedly found out HE WAS THERE in Prague....
maybe it is not connected, to the article released that says he was there?
but the timing appears like it was connected?
Why?
Fucking imbecile... you added that after I read your post.Fucking imbecile... Cohen is also connected to the Steele dossier.Being disbarred is the least of what Cohen is facing.
I don't think John Dean ever practiced law again.
How in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??
Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Read my fucking post or get someone to read it for you! I have never seen anyone grace this forum who is as stupid as you!
I'll put it in big letters so you can read it without your coke-bottle glasses!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
It’s not. But it is nw because the OP surrendered her idiotic claims about Trump and Cohen and made this thread about Hillary instead.LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for BillaryFor rosie's edification
CFIUS is comprised of representatives of nine government agencies, including Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, which Clinton headed from 2009 to 2013. The deal was approved, and Clinton could have objected, but officials privy to the deal have repeatedly stated that Clinton and other secretaries of state typically did not delve into CFIUS deals, which are usually handled below the top levels.
The main question is: At the time of the deal’s consummation, did the Clinton Foundation and the former president himself, receive money from the Russians to grease the wheels for the deal?
Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.
All told, $145 million went to the Clinton Foundation from those linked to Uranium One and UrAsia, but it went to the charity organization and not the Clinton family. Furthermore, most of those donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, according to The Post.
Assessment: Yes, the foundation received money and Bill Clinton was paid to give a speech, but there’s no evidence the Clintons were paid by Russians to push through the uranium deal.
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
10 to 1, Rosy ain't no ''she''....It’s not. But it is nw because the OP surrendered her idiotic claims about Trump and Cohen and made this thread about Hillary instead.LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.Lol you post the evidence then say there is none. Quite a mind game, it will fool the morons who voted for Billary
Yawning
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
10 to 1, Rosy ain't no ''she''....It’s not. But it is nw because the OP surrendered her idiotic claims about Trump and Cohen and made this thread about Hillary instead.LOLOLSo Hillary lied on the charities yearly funding report?You poor thing ... he said there’s no evidence to support your lie that Russia paid Hillary $150 million.
Nope, she reported the money, you need help
Your dementia worsens as I never spoke to that.
Maybe you should start up a thread about Hillary so you can talk about Trump and Cohen?
LOL...what a surprise. "this thread is not about Hillary".
The timing appears like it was connected? The Clinton’s received most of that $145 million years before the Rosatom deal and before Hillary was Secretary of State. HTF does that appear connected?Cohen sued because the Dossier stated he was in Prague, to guide the Russians on how to pay off the Hackers of the DNC emails, without leaving a paper trail..... he was the FIXER.Fucking imbecile... Cohen is also connected to the Steele dossier.Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Read my fucking post or get someone to read it for you! I have never seen anyone grace this forum who is as stupid as you!
I'll put it in big letters so you can read it without your coke-bottle glasses!
Cohen had sued because the dossier contained info about him!
Cohen claimed he was not there....
But he dropped the suit....right after it was reported in the news that the special counsel investigators allegedly found out HE WAS THERE in Prague....
maybe it is not connected, to the article released that says he was there?
but the timing appears like it was connected?
Why?
But the timing appear like it was connected? WTF. Did Bill's tarmac meeting appear to be connected to anything?
The mutt snickers as if it has a clueHow in the fuck would a dipshit like you have the faintest idea of what Cohen is facing ? Repeating of bullshit that you know nothing about again??
Heck, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure out he's looking at serious charges. Cohen played a key role in the partially unverified, partially corroborated but not at all debunked Steele Dossier.
That's Comey, not Cohen you stupid libtard!
Retard, when was Comey's office raided? I must've missed that.
amazing watching the idiots debate and they have no idea what or who they are debating .......
