Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ASK FOLKS if they think paying off a whore to keep quite is a campaign expense or a personal expense. ASK THEM.
If the raid was about paying off Stormy Daniels, there is no attorney-client privilege. Both Cohen and Trump agree that Trump had nothing to do with it. Cohen says he’s 100% responsible and never consulted with Trump.Well if this was ever presented to a jury, how do you think the prosecution would word it?LOLOLSure, if you can get a whole jury to buy that, go with it sparky.Of course it is. Their testimony could have been harmful to his campaign. Shutting them up was therefore of value to his campaign. That renders it a campaign contribution.
Oh? Pray tell, what story could Cohen possibly make up to a jury to convince them he took out an equity line against his own home to pay off a prostitute $130,000 for something of which was worth no value to Trump’s campaign??
Sure, you can word it that way, and make it sound that way, but it will still come down to partisan politics, and you are daft if you don't think it won't.
Go ahead, run a poll on this site.
It comes down to POV and whether or not you are a partisan.
ASK FOLKS if they think paying off a whore to keep quite is a campaign expense or a personal expense. ASK THEM.
No way you will ever get a unanimous jury opinion in this climate. No way.
If this raid was really about paying off whores?
I don't think it will matter. America will be pissed at the establishment that they have violated attorney client privilege over something so trivial.
Only rabid partisans would actually condone such behavior by the bureaucracy and the police state. Our very liberty and freedom is at stake here. None of this warrants such abuse of power.
Well if this was ever presented to a jury, how do you think the prosecution would word it?LOLOLSure, if you can get a whole jury to buy that, go with it sparky.Of course it is. Their testimony could have been harmful to his campaign. Shutting them up was therefore of value to his campaign. That renders it a campaign contribution.
Oh? Pray tell, what story could Cohen possibly make up to a jury to convince them he took out an equity line against his own home to pay off a prostitute $130,000 for something of which was worth no value to Trump’s campaign??
Sure, you can word it that way, and make it sound that way, but it will still come down to partisan politics, and you are daft if you don't think it won't.
Go ahead, run a poll on this site.
It comes down to POV and whether or not you are a partisan.
ASK FOLKS if they think paying off a whore to keep quite is a campaign expense or a personal expense. ASK THEM.
No way you will ever get a unanimous jury opinion in this climate. No way.
If this raid was really about paying off whores?
I don't think it will matter. America will be pissed at the establishment that they have violated attorney client privilege over something so trivial.
Only rabid partisans would actually condone such behavior by the bureaucracy and the police state. Our very liberty and freedom is at stake here. None of this warrants such abuse of power.
ASK FOLKS if they think paying off a whore to keep quite is a campaign expense or a personal expense. ASK THEM.
Sure ask them.
"Given that a billionaire had sex with a porn star in 2006 and his personal lawyer then paid her $130,000 in 2016 just 11 days before an election. Do you think the payment of $130,000 to the porn star not to reveal her story just days before the election was done to keep the information from the American voter and influence the outcome of the election by withholding this information?"
If you are going to ask, then context of the question matters.
>>>>
If the raid was about paying off Stormy Daniels, there is no attorney-client privilege. Both Cohen and Trump agree that Trump had nothing to do with it. Cohen says he’s 100% responsible and never consulted with Trump.
Maybe.ASK FOLKS if they think paying off a whore to keep quite is a campaign expense or a personal expense. ASK THEM.
Sure ask them.
"Given that a billionaire had sex with a porn star in 2006 and his personal lawyer then paid her $130,000 in 2016 just 11 days before an election. Do you think the payment of $130,000 to the porn star not to reveal her story just days before the election was done to keep the information from the American voter and influence the outcome of the election by withholding this information?"
If you are going to ask, then context of the question matters.
>>>>
Lisa Bloom admitted on national television that she offered women as much as $750,000 to smear Trump. According to your theory, shouldn't that count as an illegal campaign contribution?
What if Trump says you're fired and Mueller says no?
What If Trump Says 'You're Fired' and Mueller Says No?
which will be aired Sunday night on Tee Vee! Wheee!
Yes Tippsy Even RepublicansWhat if Trump says you're fired and Mueller says no?
What If Trump Says 'You're Fired' and Mueller Says No?
Mueller is going to work for free, with no staff, no office, not even a paperclip?
As we know now, the focus of the raid was for documents related to the Access Hollywood tape by Billy Bush. It seems that out of all the documents turned over, there are none related to that tape.
....and bank fraud and wire fraud.As we know now, the focus of the raid was for documents related to the Access Hollywood tape by Billy Bush.
All his life all he hung out with were grifters and crooksDid you know?
James Comey compared Trump to a 'mob boss' in ABC interview, according to Axios report - CNNPolitics
If they pass this, I feel the Great Douche will resign sooner with a Pardon deal.Yes Tippsy Even RepublicansWhat if Trump says you're fired and Mueller says no?
What If Trump Says 'You're Fired' and Mueller Says No?
Mueller is going to work for free, with no staff, no office, not even a paperclip?
As we know now, the focus of the raid was for documents related to the Access Hollywood tape by Billy Bush. It seems that out of all the documents turned over, there are none related to that tape.
POLITICS
Updated an hour ago
Republicans Are Moving to Protect Mueller After Trump Unleashes Attacks
Bring it on! Our nation is 'led' by a bunch of corrupt, self-serving crooks. And they are handsomely rewarded for their 'service'.Imagine if each member of Congress had his/her lives investigated over the last 10yrs....even prior to their terms. No stone left unturned, every bathroom discussion, every pizza “dinner” party with “friends”. Do you think the rule of law would matter to them?
