basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,042
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1,961
Former US Attorney Preet Bharara: "The likelihood that Michael Cohen is going to be charged is high"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?Like they did to the Clintons???/ What goes around comes aroundWhat will Mueller's next step be? Raid the home of Trump's kindergarten teacher? Check to see if he has a rating on Home Adviser? Special Counsels should never be given unlimited latitude because then they do nothing but search for crimes to justify their own existence.
Sent from my SM-J710F using Tapatalk
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?Like they did to the Clintons???/ What goes around comes aroundWhat will Mueller's next step be? Raid the home of Trump's kindergarten teacher? Check to see if he has a rating on Home Adviser? Special Counsels should never be given unlimited latitude because then they do nothing but search for crimes to justify their own existence.
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?Like they did to the Clintons???/ What goes around comes around
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Former US Attorney Preet Bharara: "The likelihood that Michael Cohen is going to be charged is high"
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?Like they did to the Clintons???/ What goes around comes around
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
3 out of 4 wrong
you're improving
![]()
You have no idea whether the standard was met.What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?When did Ken Starr raid Clinton's lawyer?
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Probable cause, fool. The standard was met. The warrant was properly adjudicated and executed. Done.
What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
3 out of 4 wrong
you're improving
![]()
You're 100% wrong, as always.
You have no idea whether the standard was met.What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Probable cause, fool. The standard was met. The warrant was properly adjudicated and executed. Done.
so bri you're right and Mueller and all those lawyers, all those experts are wrong?What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities was Clinton's lawyer engaged in?
Sent from my SM-J710F using TapatalkWhat illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
3 out of 4 wrong
you're improving
![]()
You're 100% wrong, as always.
sigh....Moron, what does that have to to with someone talking about presumption of innocence after crying that Hillary got away with committing crimes?Yeah because our justice system ALWAYS gets the crook...LOL!Holyfuckingshit!I guess the presumption of innocence isn't in your vocabulary.
BTW, Cohen is his lawyer.
He shares attorney client privileges.
He has a right to talk to him.
And that's the only reason they raided his home.
Weren’t you the one earlier claiming Hillary committed crimes but was never charged with them??
You should have “hypocrite” tattooed across your forehead..... backwards, so you can read it every time you look in a mirror.
Why didn't they raid the place where Hillary's server was? It was under subpeona and she failed to produce it.
marion, it was a civil suit that was asking for her server....not anything to do with Congressional investigations or the FBI investigation......![]()
Why TF not?? 9 tenths of the world doesFormer US Attorney Preet Bharara: "The likelihood that Michael Cohen is going to be charged is high"
Yeah, he doesn't hold a any kind of animus towards Trump, right?
Everyone accept the TARDS can see it
View attachment 187071
View attachment 187072
John Salisbury on Twitter
Folks that watch TV or read CFR reporting are watching a manufactured reality.
Sure, Trump and Cohen might be guilty as hell, but none of us would truly know it, for the folks that they are having problems with are the same folks that feed us information. The corporatacracy is out of control.
We are all just arguing about a fantasy paradigm, and none of us really know what the hell is going on, b/c both sides are lying to us.
There has been a civil war raging in the shadow government and Deep State since the last presidential election.
The best sources of information are from citizen journalists, and open source investigations. We need to get beyond our partisan politics to understand this data. Thanks for the posted information.
It’s not those of us who are following these stories in newspapers or traditional media outlets who are living in an “alternate reality”. I clicked on all the links and stories you and Mind Wars posted and they are just full of false and misleading information.
Mind Wars posts tweets about the raid being about sex between consenting adults, which if false. It’s about money laundering, campaign funding and ethics violations.
Another of the tweets he linked to called the Mueller Investigations a “witch hunt”. Again, this is false.
The Mueller Investigation has produced close to 100 indictments and five guilty pleas, so far. Mueller has determined how the Russians interfered, when they laid the foundation work and had even accessed the employment records of the troll farm.
In response, the Trump Administration has acknowledged the validity of Mueller’s work by imposing sanctions on Russia as approved by Congress.
Even Trump has admitted that the Russians interfered although he keeps repeating the false mantra of “no collusion”, even as Mueller has produced substantial evidence that there was, in fact, collusion.
Last but not least was the tweet that when the Cohen warrant was served, all of the MSM issued the exact same story within six minutes of it happening. Well since these stories were based on the same press release from the Justice Department that makes sense.
Of course when the alt-right gets a bug up their asses Breitbart, the Daily Caller and Mind Wars all publish the exact same false narrative. Often they just repost one another’s stories, with attribution.
The problem with your alt right sources is that so much of what they post is out and out lies. Like your posted story about people celebrating the fall of the WTC. I have no trouble believing that some people celebrated but not one person who claims to have seen handfuls of people celebrating would go on the record about it, which puts these claims in doubt.
So basically all you have is rumours and gossip. That’s not credible reporting but because you WANT to believe it happened, you’re prepared to accept it’s true and being covered up.
I didn't write, "alternate reality," I wrote, manufactured reality; as in. . . Manufacturing Consent - Wikipedia
Propaganda model - Wikipedia
![]()
‘Deep State’ Veterans find New Homes in Mainstream Media
You have no idea what I am talking about.
Your partisan blinders won't allow you to perceive the world in any way other than how you see it.
This whole investigation is built upon a lie and Trump is part of it. Yet you at once want to use his statements as bolstering your case, and in the next breath tell us everything he says are lies? WTF?
Did I not write; "Sure, Trump and Cohen might be guilty as hell?"
Of course they have moved on to, "It’s about money laundering, campaign funding and ethics violations," do you know why? Because their original story, "collusion with Russians" was all bullshit.
And there has never been a politician in Washington that hasn't been guilty of money laundering, campaign funding violations, and ethics violations. If you think there has been, you are obtuse. At this point, the establishment is FISHING. WHY? Because the current POTUS is an outsider that has not paid his dues and has not been anointed by the power establishment. Those on the left and right despise him for this. Any reason is a good reason to indict him. No matter how flimsy, when generally, these scandals are mild when the people have spoken.
The amount of crap the last POTUS did was unbelievable compared to the current one, yet we are expected to believe this investigation should continue. Hell, that last president has been a company man, this one was a high rolling, two bit con artist. Yet ignorant Americans are supposed to be convinced this one is more of a threat to American stability and world peace?
Sure. Whatevers.
This one wanted us out of the middle east. That was going swimmingly until the Deep State planted another false flag. . . .
![]()
Continue consuming these MSM soap opera stories, carry on. . . .
You have no idea whether the standard was met.What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Probable cause, fool. The standard was met. The warrant was properly adjudicated and executed. Done.
We do, dope. The judge signed off on it and it was executed.
It's up to you to prove otherwise.
I love the way snowflakes delude themselves that everyone agrees with their idiocies.Why TF not?? 9 tenths of the world doesFormer US Attorney Preet Bharara: "The likelihood that Michael Cohen is going to be charged is high"
Yeah, he doesn't hold a any kind of animus towards Trump, right?
You have no idea whether the standard was met.Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Probable cause, fool. The standard was met. The warrant was properly adjudicated and executed. Done.
We do, dope. The judge signed off on it and it was executed.
It's up to you to prove otherwise.
As have seen in the case of the FISA warrant, federal judges are rubber stamps for whatever some douchebag prosecutor wants.
I'm not the only one who disagrees with them, idiot. Plenty of lawyers say this warrant was illegal.so bri you're right and Mueller and all those lawyers, all those experts are wrong?What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?What illegal activities hasTrump's lawer engaged in?
Well, duh. The suspected crimes outlined in the warrant.
Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
3 out of 4 wrong
you're improving
![]()
You're 100% wrong, as always.
I just did, moron.You have no idea whether the standard was met.Suspected. Mueller had not proof, and he violated attorney-client privilege. Any evidence obtained will be thrown out.
Probable cause, fool. The standard was met. The warrant was properly adjudicated and executed. Done.
We do, dope. The judge signed off on it and it was executed.
It's up to you to prove otherwise.
As have seen in the case of the FISA warrant, federal judges are rubber stamps for whatever some douchebag prosecutor wants.
Prove otherwise or shut up.