Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare

Many parents are too stupid to know what is good for their kids. Who is protecting those kids ?

People like Stephanie would say no one should. She'd probably even deny funding for Dickensian poorhouses. Hers is more of a Jack London "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" universe. For everyone else, of course, not her.
 
You know what's peculiar? No one but the "Washington Free Beacon" seems to be carrying this non-story.

I was wondering if this regulation was tied to (A) state licensing of daycare centers and (B) government funding of same.

No way to find that information, and now I'm beginning to wonder if someone didn't just Make Shit Up.

I sure hope Stephanie will post any follow-up reports she might come across.

As if.
 
ah, still no answer from closed caption, understandable, no one wants to admit to being a hypocrite.

About what? Drug tests?

No, people should be drug tested to show they need to feed their families. Of there is evidence that funds have been misused THEN you have a point.


Then you should also be saying "these schools should be able to feed thin kids whatever they want an still receive funding"

And OBVIOUSLY there is MASSIVE misuse of funds in welfare.


Sad that you couldn't just say "yes same same if you accept government funding, you better be prepared to accept government rules" hypocrite.
 
You mean health professionals know more about health that trash men? Well yeah. I'll leave it up to you to make the argument of why fried food is the better option.

But I get a feeling you cant make that argument. So why defend something you cant say?
Where did I say it was a better option? It's no ones business what people eat

But then again eating some fried food once in a while will not make you obese either


So your answer is to do nothing and if anyone does anything you object. Seems like a good plan!

I'm for not telling people how to live their lives and it is a good plan

Seriously a cupcake ban is not the answer but you idiots seem to think it is

if someone is taking care of my child, I'm all for them being told how they are going to treat my child.

In all seriousness Jillian, isn't that YOUR job? Why on Earth would you want the government telling a third party how to raise YOUR child?
Because libs can't think for themselves.
 
ah, still no answer from closed caption, understandable, no one wants to admit to being a hypocrite.

About what? Drug tests?

No, people should be drug tested to show they need to feed their families. Of there is evidence that funds have been misused THEN you have a point.


Then you should also be saying "these schools should be able to feed thin kids whatever they want an still receive funding"

And OBVIOUSLY there is MASSIVE misuse of funds in welfare.

Sad that you couldn't just say "yes same same if you accept government funding, you better be prepared to accept government rules" hypocrite.

Whats the correlation here? I dont get what your point is?
 
ah, still no answer from closed caption, understandable, no one wants to admit to being a hypocrite.

About what? Drug tests?

No, people should be drug tested to show they need to feed their families. Of there is evidence that funds have been misused THEN you have a point.


Then you should also be saying "these schools should be able to feed thin kids whatever they want an still receive funding"

And OBVIOUSLY there is MASSIVE misuse of funds in welfare.

Sad that you couldn't just say "yes same same if you accept government funding, you better be prepared to accept government rules" hypocrite.

Whats the correlation here? I dont get what your point is?
Oh, I know you know exactly what the correlation is. Government money is government money. If you take it, you are oblige to follow their rules.. Including consenting to drug testing if the law requires it.
 
ah, still no answer from closed caption, understandable, no one wants to admit to being a hypocrite.

About what? Drug tests?

No, people should be drug tested to show they need to feed their families. Of there is evidence that funds have been misused THEN you have a point.


Then you should also be saying "these schools should be able to feed thin kids whatever they want an still receive funding"

And OBVIOUSLY there is MASSIVE misuse of funds in welfare.

Sad that you couldn't just say "yes same same if you accept government funding, you better be prepared to accept government rules" hypocrite.

Whats the correlation here? I dont get what your point is?
Oh, I know you know exactly what the correlation is. Government money is government money. If you take it, you are oblige to follow their rules.. Including consenting to drug testing if the law requires it.

Ok, who is arguing against following the rules?
 
I don't why we the people are paying for a bunch of people who are Suppose to Represent US in Congress. these Agencies just make up their own rules to stick on us.

snip:
Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare
Final regulation only allows daycare centers to serve juice once a day


BY: Elizabeth Harrington
April 25, 2016 1:50 pm


New rules stemming from the school lunch law championed by first lady Michelle Obama are banning popular children’s cereals like Frosted Flakes in daycare centers.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a final rule Monday that will affect more than 3 million kids in daycare centers across the country. The regulation will only allow daycare centers to serve juice once a day, will ban fried foods, and encourages centers to not add honey to a child’s yogurt.

The regulation is a result of the 2010 law aimed at school lunches, a top priority of Mrs. Obama’s Let’s Move anti-obesity initiative. The government hopes ( hummm. the Government hopes) the new rule will “help children build healthy habits.”

“This final rule updates the meal pattern requirements for the Child and Adult Care Food Program to better align them with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010,” the final rule states. “This rule requires centers and day care homes participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program to serve more whole grains and a greater variety of vegetables and fruit, and reduces the amount of added sugars and solid fats in meals.”

The law required the USDA to “promote health and wellness in child care settings via guidance and technical assistance that focuses on nutrition, physical activity, and limiting electronic media use,” according to the regulation.

all of the wonderful here:
Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare

Which part bothers you more?

That Michelle Obama is advocating for healthier food for children?
Or that our day care centers who get tax dollars to feed children are going to have to feed them healthier food?

“This final rule updates the meal pattern requirements for the Child and Adult Care Food Program to better align them with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010,” the final rule states. “This rule requires centers and day care homes participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program to serve more whole grains and a greater variety of vegetables and fruit, and reduces the amount of added sugars and solid fats in meals.”

To listen to Conservatives, it is an outrage that our tax dollars be used to feed healthier food to kids.
 
Providing toddlers with healthful food so they don't end up fat like 40% of American adults? OUTRAGE!!!!! Oh, the huge manatee!
I grew up eating Frosted Flakes and drinking Cherry Kool Aid made with real sugar and so did most of the kids I grew up with

None of us are obese.

Good for you.

Now is there some reason why you think kids are better off eating Frosted Flakes than a non-sugary whole grain cereal?
 
How does "the Government" program the little children? they start with Food.

all heil the Government

why is eating healthy bad, crazy steffie? :cuckoo:

Why does the government have to tell you what you can feed your kids?

The government isn't telling you what you can feed your kids.

It is telling the child care facility that you send your kids to that get tax payer subsidized food that they have to follow rules for healthier food.
 
Many parents are too stupid to know what is good for their kids. Who is protecting those kids ?

People like Stephanie would say no one should. She'd probably even deny funding for Dickensian poorhouses. Hers is more of a Jack London "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" universe. For everyone else, of course, not her.
We had a similar thing over here a few years ago. Local news filmed a series of obese teenage mums kicking off because little Johnny was deprived of his sugar and fat fix at lunchtime. Then they were filmed waddling up to the fence and throwing chocolate bars and bags of crisps over the fence to their obese offspring. It was a metaphor for dumb Britain.
 
Many parents are too stupid to know what is good for their kids. Who is protecting those kids ?

People like Stephanie would say no one should. She'd probably even deny funding for Dickensian poorhouses. Hers is more of a Jack London "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" universe. For everyone else, of course, not her.
We had a similar thing over here a few years ago. Local news filmed a series of obese teenage mums kicking off because little Johnny was deprived of his sugar and fat fix at lunchtime. Then they were filmed waddling up to the fence and throwing chocolate bars and bags of crisps over the fence to their obese offspring. It was a metaphor for dumb Britain.

The difference here is, they're not even Stephanie's kids. She presumes to the right to dictate to what other people's children are allowed to eat at daycare.

Or maybe she just hates Michelle Obama. There's a lot of that in this forum.
 
Many parents are too stupid to know what is good for their kids. Who is protecting those kids ?

People like Stephanie would say no one should. She'd probably even deny funding for Dickensian poorhouses. Hers is more of a Jack London "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" universe. For everyone else, of course, not her.
We had a similar thing over here a few years ago. Local news filmed a series of obese teenage mums kicking off because little Johnny was deprived of his sugar and fat fix at lunchtime. Then they were filmed waddling up to the fence and throwing chocolate bars and bags of crisps over the fence to their obese offspring. It was a metaphor for dumb Britain.

The difference here is, they're not even Stephanie's kids. She presumes to the right to dictate to what other people's children are allowed to eat at daycare.

Or maybe she just hates Michelle Obama. There's a lot of that in this forum.
she says she is a great grandmother and said she was once a lunch lady, scary on both accounts
 
more good news about: THE GOVERNMENT

SNIP:
Study: Cost of U.S. Regulations Larger Than Germany’s Economy
Regs have cost economy $4 trillion, $13,000 per person




BY: Elizabeth Harrington
April 26, 2016 12:50 pm


The cost of U.S. regulations is now larger than Germany’s economy, amounting to a $4 trillion loss to the American economy, according to a new study by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

The study, released Tuesday, found that regulations over the past several decades amount to a loss of $13,000 for each American worker.

“The impact of regulation on economic growth has been widely studied, but most research has focused on a narrow set of regulations, industries, or both,” according to the report. “These studies typically rely on regulatory indexes that measure subsets of all regulation, on country-to-country comparisons, on short time spans, or on surveys in which experts report how regulated they believe their country or industry is.

“In order to better understand the cumulative cost of regulation, a comprehensive look at all regulations across many industries over a long period of time is imperative.”

Researchers at Mercatus studied data from 22 industries from 1977 to 2012, finding regulations have distorted “investments choices that lead to innovation” and have “created a considerable drag on the economy.” The result: an average shrinking of the economy by 0.8 percent a year.

“If regulations had been held constant at levels observed in 1980, the American economy would have been 25 percent larger than it was in 2012,” the report said. “This amounts to a $4 trillion loss in 2012 for the American economy or $13,000 loss per person, a significant amount of money for most American workers.”

The cost of federal regulations amounts to the fourth-largest GDP in the world, surpassing the economies of Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Italy, Russia, and India.

all of it here:
Study: Cost of U.S. Regulations Larger Than Germany’s Economy

This latest mandate from the White House should be a real winner --- akin to Michelle’s previous demands.


1M kids stop school lunch due to Michelle Obama’s standards

As School Meals Have Gotten Healthier, 1.4 Million Students Drop Out of School Lunch Program

Students in Full Revolt Against Michelle Obama's Horrible School Lunch Mandates! - The Political Insider

Kentucky kids to first lady Michelle Obama: Your food ‘tastes like vomit’
Mandate? It's a Mandate?
 
Many parents are too stupid to know what is good for their kids. Who is protecting those kids ?

People like Stephanie would say no one should. She'd probably even deny funding for Dickensian poorhouses. Hers is more of a Jack London "Kill or be killed, eat or be eaten" universe. For everyone else, of course, not her.
We had a similar thing over here a few years ago. Local news filmed a series of obese teenage mums kicking off because little Johnny was deprived of his sugar and fat fix at lunchtime. Then they were filmed waddling up to the fence and throwing chocolate bars and bags of crisps over the fence to their obese offspring. It was a metaphor for dumb Britain.

The difference here is, they're not even Stephanie's kids. She presumes to the right to dictate to what other people's children are allowed to eat at daycare.

Or maybe she just hates Michelle Obama. There's a lot of that in this forum.
she says she is a great grandmother and said she was once a lunch lady, scary on both accounts
The lunch lady was a scary sadistic lady without any teeth,
 
This is what happens when you send your kids to a government ran public school system, the gov dictates what goes into your children brains and bodies. Brainwashing youth for socialism to groom them for control. Socialist like the Nazis, Democrats and Communist use education as propaganda, this is why its difficult for liberals to become deprogrammed because they've been desensitized and institutionalized.

slide_1.jpg

slide_6.jpg
 
This is what happens when you send your kids to a government ran public school system, the gov dictates what goes into your children brains and bodies. Brainwashing youth for socialism to groom them for control. Socialist like the Nazis, Democrats and Communist use education as propaganda, this is why its difficult for liberals to become deprogrammed because they've been desensitized and institutionalized.

slide_1.jpg

slide_6.jpg
Drama queen.
 
I don't why we the people are paying for a bunch of people who are Suppose to Represent US in Congress. these Agencies just make up their own rules to stick on us.

snip:
Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare
Final regulation only allows daycare centers to serve juice once a day


BY: Elizabeth Harrington
April 25, 2016 1:50 pm


New rules stemming from the school lunch law championed by first lady Michelle Obama are banning popular children’s cereals like Frosted Flakes in daycare centers.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service issued a final rule Monday that will affect more than 3 million kids in daycare centers across the country. The regulation will only allow daycare centers to serve juice once a day, will ban fried foods, and encourages centers to not add honey to a child’s yogurt.

The regulation is a result of the 2010 law aimed at school lunches, a top priority of Mrs. Obama’s Let’s Move anti-obesity initiative. The government hopes ( hummm. the Government hopes) the new rule will “help children build healthy habits.”

“This final rule updates the meal pattern requirements for the Child and Adult Care Food Program to better align them with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010,” the final rule states. “This rule requires centers and day care homes participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program to serve more whole grains and a greater variety of vegetables and fruit, and reduces the amount of added sugars and solid fats in meals.”

The law required the USDA to “promote health and wellness in child care settings via guidance and technical assistance that focuses on nutrition, physical activity, and limiting electronic media use,” according to the regulation.

all of the wonderful here:
Michelle Obama Lunch Rules Ban Fried Foods, Frosted Flakes in Daycare
Cheerios and Rice Krispies are better without sugar, anyway. And you can put a banana or blueberries on corn flakes, and that's better tasting than Frosted Flakes, anyway. Michelle just wants to help kids be healthy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top