TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
Gun bans run afoul of the 2A.
Nothing unconstitutional about Jim Crow.
Gotta love republicans
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gun bans run afoul of the 2A.
Nothing unconstitutional about Jim Crow.
Gun bans run afoul of the 2A.
Nothing unconstitutional about Jim Crow.
Gotta love republicans![]()
Another win for smaller government and freedom!
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
People voted for gun bans in the past too. People voted for Jim Crow laws in the past too. Doesn't make them any more Constitutional.
Gun bans run afoul of the 2A.
Nothing unconstitutional about Jim Crow.
Another win for smaller government and freedom!
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
Tyranny? This is tyranny but letting people vote to not allow someone a right isn't?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
The court may impose it but they can't make the people accept it. They will just take more direct action.
Ridiculous.
The court isn’t ‘imposing’ anything on anyone.
The 14th Amendment applies only to the states and local jurisdictions, not private persons or organizations; you and others on the right remain at liberty to hate gay Americans.
Another win for smaller government and freedom!
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
Judge strikes down Michigan's ban on gay marriage
DETROIT In a historic ruling that provided a huge morale boost to the gay-rights movement, a federal judge Friday struck down Michigan's ban on same-sex marriage, making it the 18th state in the nation to allow gays and lesbians to join in matrimony just like their heterosexual counterparts.
Another win for smaller government and freedom!
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
The court may impose it but they can't make the people accept it. They will just take more direct action.
Ridiculous.
The court isnt imposing anything on anyone.
The 14th Amendment applies only to the states and local jurisdictions, not private persons or organizations; you and others on the right remain at liberty to hate gay Americans.
Yes but the Civil Rights Act expanded this to all public institutions.
And by the laws of reciprocity, the Golden Rule that applies to all people,
if you want equal freedom, you must respect the same of others.
If you impose on others, they will impose back on you.
By natural laws, people will defend their free will and beliefs, and will protest, resist, and petition against anything that oppresses their consent or free will.
This is just natural law, which our Constitutional principles were drawn from.
Regardless if we do or do not follow the Constitution literally,
all human beings are operating under natural laws that govern our behavior.
If you impose something against someone's free will, they will object and fight to correct or reform it.
I've never met a human being who didn't react that way.
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
Tyranny? This is tyranny but letting people vote to not allow someone a right isn't?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
An unelected unaccountable judge dictating to people what they must accept, against their known expressed wishes is tyranny. Yes. It is the very definition of it.
Because religious beliefs are involved...
No, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
Tyranny? This is tyranny but letting people vote to not allow someone a right isn't?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
An unelected unaccountable judge dictating to people what they must accept, against their known expressed wishes is tyranny. Yes. It is the very definition of it.
People voted for gun bans in the past too. People voted for Jim Crow laws in the past too. Doesn't make them any more Constitutional.
Gun bans run afoul of the 2A.
Nothing unconstitutional about Jim Crow.
Reminds me of how
"prochoice" arguments apply to abortion
(where protecting individual freedom trumps laws defending life)
but when it comes to health care mandates
"prochoice" argument do not apply
(where "right to health care" trumps defending "freedom to choose" how to do so)
Sure, political agenda will affect if people will argue for or against Constitutionality.
But for liberals who don't cite Constitutionality authority to back arguments anyway,
you can demonstrate similar using "prochoice" principles that are mysteriously abandoned.
Judges strike down unconstitutional laws. Elected or not is irrelevant. That is part of the 3 Branches of balance we have. You know this already and are just trollingNo, idiot. People voted for that ban. People in the state voted to establish a state standard of marriage. The 10th Amendment allows them to do just that. Now we have unelected judges defying the clear will of the people. That is not freedom but tyranny. But in good news many of those gays will get to work on research, infreastructure and education.
Tyranny? This is tyranny but letting people vote to not allow someone a right isn't?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
An unelected unaccountable judge dictating to people what they must accept, against their known expressed wishes is tyranny. Yes. It is the very definition of it.
The only natural law that matters is hoping that the universe doesn't kill you.The court may impose it but they can't make the people accept it. They will just take more direct action.
Ridiculous.
The court isnt imposing anything on anyone.
The 14th Amendment applies only to the states and local jurisdictions, not private persons or organizations; you and others on the right remain at liberty to hate gay Americans.
Yes but the Civil Rights Act expanded this to all public institutions.
And by the laws of reciprocity, the Golden Rule that applies to all people,
if you want equal freedom, you must respect the same of others.
If you impose on others, they will impose back on you.
By natural laws, people will defend their free will and beliefs, and will protest, resist, and petition against anything that oppresses their consent or free will.
This is just natural law, which our Constitutional principles were drawn from.
Regardless if we do or do not follow the Constitution literally,
all human beings are operating under natural laws that govern our behavior.
If you impose something against someone's free will, they will object and fight to correct or reform it.
I've never met a human being who didn't react that way.
The Universe doesn't give a damn either way. You are of no importance.The only natural law that matters is hoping that the universe doesn't kill you.Ridiculous.
The court isnt imposing anything on anyone.
The 14th Amendment applies only to the states and local jurisdictions, not private persons or organizations; you and others on the right remain at liberty to hate gay Americans.
Yes but the Civil Rights Act expanded this to all public institutions.
And by the laws of reciprocity, the Golden Rule that applies to all people,
if you want equal freedom, you must respect the same of others.
If you impose on others, they will impose back on you.
By natural laws, people will defend their free will and beliefs, and will protest, resist, and petition against anything that oppresses their consent or free will.
This is just natural law, which our Constitutional principles were drawn from.
Regardless if we do or do not follow the Constitution literally,
all human beings are operating under natural laws that govern our behavior.
If you impose something against someone's free will, they will object and fight to correct or reform it.
I've never met a human being who didn't react that way.
Michigan State also has equal protection in their state constitution. Pretty sure defining marriage based on sexual orientation is not equal protection.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.