Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh looky, someone that thinks anyone is really interested in their Uterus.
.
have less of a foot to stand on if the whores didnt expect the taxpayers to cover their expenses when they got knocked up.Oh looky, someone that thinks anyone is really interested in their Uterus.
.
oh looky, someone hasn't got a clue... so what else is new around here?
Congressional GOP Pushes Zygote Personhood Bills
Paul Ryan Cosponsors New Fetal Personhood Bill | The Huffington Post
A vagina is only a policy if it runs your life.it's about policy, stupid.
unless it has to do with something you dont agree with like, making it illegal to murder chidlren, then you want everyone to stay out of it. But again, what does this have to do with the rape proof cows coming to picket Trumps Inaugurationthis is why we leave law review up to those who have the capacity to comprehend the constitution.
have less of a foot to stand on if the whores didnt expect the taxpayers to cover their expenses when they got knocked up.
As long as other people are paying, other people get a say. What you need to get is a clue.
Those are about human life, not vaginas.Oh looky, someone that thinks anyone is really interested in their Uterus.
.
oh looky, someone hasn't got a clue... so what else is new around here?
Congressional GOP Pushes Zygote Personhood Bills
Paul Ryan Cosponsors New Fetal Personhood Bill | The Huffington Post
Forced Ultrasounds
what a sluthave less of a foot to stand on if the whores didnt expect the taxpayers to cover their expenses when they got knocked up.
As long as other people are paying, other people get a say. What you need to get is a clue.
^ expenses blah blah blah........... what a maroooon!
The Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's "zone of privacy" against state laws.
It says nothing about abortion or when life starts. The court invented law for the states. It should be up to the people in the state. You can't do whatever you want to kids in the privacy of your home either so you are trying to obfuscate.The Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's "zone of privacy" against state laws.
Bad law. And as we all know bad law must be repealed. Why did we have to change marriage if all law is settled?the court is rightfully disinterested in all things beside the point. first trimester privacy is settled law.
and why Roe VS Wade if the law was already settled before that?Bad law. And as we all know bad law must be repealed. Why did we have to change marriage if all law is settled?the court is rightfully disinterested in all things beside the point. first trimester privacy is settled law.
It needs to be made clear that at the end of 6 years, its over, done, the ride ends and you dont get any more tickets to get back on.thats why I added trade school to it. they always need someone to ride the back of the garbage truck, to run a polisher over the mall floors at night, to change oil at a Jiffy Lube, deliver mail, there are a whole bunch of jobs for the brain dead out there. but for even the worst of the worst, unless they are actually retarded, a GED and an associates degree is not out of reach given 6 years. The problems I see are with say, those fat ass white women that for some reason have to talk like they are black, nobody is going to hire them to any position that deals directly with a customer, or involves picking up a telephone so they pretty much have "cooled" their way out of employment, they might end up being the ones that get real hungery after their 6 years has been used for the handouts.I think there is such a thing, maybe not by name, but if I understand him correctly I would agree.Intelligent welfare? Talk about an oxymoron.
lets say someone is in a position that maybe the lost a job they had and are not qualified to do anything else, or they for whatever reason ended up having to work and care for a family before they had skills or education, maybe its a woman that had a kid or two and then the scumbag sperm donor decided to run off or was killed etc.. There are times when even I have to say that its the right thing to do to help these people. So in these instances, I feel (and its only my opinion Im not trying to speak for anyone else) but, in these instances and other situations that might be similar, I think it is our responsibility to see that these people are given a hand to ensure they dont starve or "die in the streets" I would be all for them getting a place to live, some spending money, medical attention if needed from the taxpayer. Its the right thing to do. However, while getting that assistance, I think they need to step up and contribute, Im not talking about going down and flipping a burger or working the register at the local dollar store, What I would want to see is them back in school, they can go to college and get an education to open the doors for them, or maybe a trade school where they can learn a trade that will allow them to take care of themselves. But they have to show that they are working towards a goal to be self sufficient. Those that want to just kick back and collect that check once a month? sorry, the free ride is over. No attempt to better yourself? no check.
That would be a good investment of taxpayer dollar. But that is not what is happening right now.
Be reasonable give 6 years maximum for them to recieve the assistance, this gives them time to secure a degree even if they cant attend the college on a full time basis.
what we get out of it? the taxpayers ends up with a new member of the taxpayers club, We have someone raising their children and teaching them respect for themselves and others. but mostly, we get someone contributing to society instead of being a life long drain.
There are ways to fix the welfare problem.
What we can not do is continue to give free housing, food, cell phones, transportation, medical care, etc... to someone that has no desire to ever carry their own weight and contribute along with the rest of us.
If welfare was used like that, I would not have a single word to say against it.
Medical insurance is a different story, that is something that should not be free to anyone.
You're leaving one big factor out of your idea, and that is most of those people are not qualified for college or able to complete it even if they got in.
I tell this story from time to time. Back in the housing bubble days when it was impossible for us landlords to find decent tenants, I would get applicants that would reply to my CraigsList ad with such deplorable writing skills the emails looked like they were written by six year olds. With no choice, I had to interview some of them only to find out that they were indeed high school graduates.
Most of the emails I deleted because I figured if these people write this way, HTF do they find a job?
You're not going to make college material out of such people no matter how hard you try.
I don't think you'll find many people that want to throw these individuals in the street and let them starve, but our generosity grows thin when we see how some of these people live and conduct themselves while on the dole. That's because for Democrats, social programs are a political tool and people will take advantage of them if the offer is out there.
The problem with that is some of those people will run out those six years and then look for government to do something else for them. They've become accustomed to government always being there no matter what they do.
Yes, the Democrats are able to win elections by being Santa Clause, but by putting able bodied people on the dole to buy votes, it makes everybody on the dole look bad when we witness their activities.
For me, the most disheartening recurring event is at my grocery store when I get behind some of these food stamp people. They buy whatever they can using food stamps, and then whip out that wad of cash to pay for their alcohol, cigarettes, huge bags of dog food and cat litter, greeting cards, perfume and so on.
This is not to say it happens all the time, but enough times for me to wish an end to the program.
Or take housing for instance. Why is HUD renting and buying homes in the suburb where it's more expensive and taxes are higher than the city? I have them next door to me because the landlord was asking too much for his apartments and couldn't find anybody, so he went to HUD for tenants.
One tenant has two kids that I can see and the other has four. Their SUV's are in the driveway most of the week during working hours. If I have to use the bathroom in the middle of the night, I can see the lights on in their apartment. During the holidays, one of them took off for the week, she left her bedroom window wide open, and I don't have to tell you what kind of weather we have here up north this time of year. Why would she care? She's likely not paying for her utilities either. The bed cover she draped over the window was flapping in and out when the wind kicked up.
Hunger sucks, the reason people think like they do know is because the safety net has become too large.
And the government needs to adhere to the rules. Maybe the churches,, oh wait, thats right, the left hates churches, they would never think to accept food from a Christian charity to feed their kids.
It needs to be made clear that at the end of 6 years, its over, done, the ride ends and you dont get any more tickets to get back on.thats why I added trade school to it. they always need someone to ride the back of the garbage truck, to run a polisher over the mall floors at night, to change oil at a Jiffy Lube, deliver mail, there are a whole bunch of jobs for the brain dead out there. but for even the worst of the worst, unless they are actually retarded, a GED and an associates degree is not out of reach given 6 years. The problems I see are with say, those fat ass white women that for some reason have to talk like they are black, nobody is going to hire them to any position that deals directly with a customer, or involves picking up a telephone so they pretty much have "cooled" their way out of employment, they might end up being the ones that get real hungery after their 6 years has been used for the handouts.I think there is such a thing, maybe not by name, but if I understand him correctly I would agree.
lets say someone is in a position that maybe the lost a job they had and are not qualified to do anything else, or they for whatever reason ended up having to work and care for a family before they had skills or education, maybe its a woman that had a kid or two and then the scumbag sperm donor decided to run off or was killed etc.. There are times when even I have to say that its the right thing to do to help these people. So in these instances, I feel (and its only my opinion Im not trying to speak for anyone else) but, in these instances and other situations that might be similar, I think it is our responsibility to see that these people are given a hand to ensure they dont starve or "die in the streets" I would be all for them getting a place to live, some spending money, medical attention if needed from the taxpayer. Its the right thing to do. However, while getting that assistance, I think they need to step up and contribute, Im not talking about going down and flipping a burger or working the register at the local dollar store, What I would want to see is them back in school, they can go to college and get an education to open the doors for them, or maybe a trade school where they can learn a trade that will allow them to take care of themselves. But they have to show that they are working towards a goal to be self sufficient. Those that want to just kick back and collect that check once a month? sorry, the free ride is over. No attempt to better yourself? no check.
That would be a good investment of taxpayer dollar. But that is not what is happening right now.
Be reasonable give 6 years maximum for them to recieve the assistance, this gives them time to secure a degree even if they cant attend the college on a full time basis.
what we get out of it? the taxpayers ends up with a new member of the taxpayers club, We have someone raising their children and teaching them respect for themselves and others. but mostly, we get someone contributing to society instead of being a life long drain.
There are ways to fix the welfare problem.
What we can not do is continue to give free housing, food, cell phones, transportation, medical care, etc... to someone that has no desire to ever carry their own weight and contribute along with the rest of us.
If welfare was used like that, I would not have a single word to say against it.
Medical insurance is a different story, that is something that should not be free to anyone.
You're leaving one big factor out of your idea, and that is most of those people are not qualified for college or able to complete it even if they got in.
I tell this story from time to time. Back in the housing bubble days when it was impossible for us landlords to find decent tenants, I would get applicants that would reply to my CraigsList ad with such deplorable writing skills the emails looked like they were written by six year olds. With no choice, I had to interview some of them only to find out that they were indeed high school graduates.
Most of the emails I deleted because I figured if these people write this way, HTF do they find a job?
You're not going to make college material out of such people no matter how hard you try.
I don't think you'll find many people that want to throw these individuals in the street and let them starve, but our generosity grows thin when we see how some of these people live and conduct themselves while on the dole. That's because for Democrats, social programs are a political tool and people will take advantage of them if the offer is out there.
The problem with that is some of those people will run out those six years and then look for government to do something else for them. They've become accustomed to government always being there no matter what they do.
Yes, the Democrats are able to win elections by being Santa Clause, but by putting able bodied people on the dole to buy votes, it makes everybody on the dole look bad when we witness their activities.
For me, the most disheartening recurring event is at my grocery store when I get behind some of these food stamp people. They buy whatever they can using food stamps, and then whip out that wad of cash to pay for their alcohol, cigarettes, huge bags of dog food and cat litter, greeting cards, perfume and so on.
This is not to say it happens all the time, but enough times for me to wish an end to the program.
Or take housing for instance. Why is HUD renting and buying homes in the suburb where it's more expensive and taxes are higher than the city? I have them next door to me because the landlord was asking too much for his apartments and couldn't find anybody, so he went to HUD for tenants.
One tenant has two kids that I can see and the other has four. Their SUV's are in the driveway most of the week during working hours. If I have to use the bathroom in the middle of the night, I can see the lights on in their apartment. During the holidays, one of them took off for the week, she left her bedroom window wide open, and I don't have to tell you what kind of weather we have here up north this time of year. Why would she care? She's likely not paying for her utilities either. The bed cover she draped over the window was flapping in and out when the wind kicked up.
Hunger sucks, the reason people think like they do know is because the safety net has become too large.
And the government needs to adhere to the rules. Maybe the churches,, oh wait, thats right, the left hates churches, they would never think to accept food from a Christian charity to feed their kids.
It's not that I disagree with you all that much, but I'm used to how the game is played.
When those six years are up, some leftist show or channel will be out hunting for sob stories and will find them by the dozens or more. Then under public pressure, the caving starts.
Not to digress, but I was watching Bill O' the other evening and they had this video of this poor poor illegal mother who had a kid here and started crying about being shipped back to Mexico. As usual, first comes the crying, then the sympathy and caving.
If the Republicans adopted your idea, you would be seeing the same kind of thing only with welfare moms. It would be broadcast from news station to news station.
Well, you certainly fit the mold of a Drumplethinskin voter.Actually I dont think they are looking for a million women, they are really hoping for 2500 women, the million is the weight of the women combined.
Wonder how many of them will actually look like women, and how many will look like rosie odonnel
thank you. that means you realize I support my family and dont expect others to pay my way.Well, you certainly fit the mold of a Drumplethinskin voter.Actually I dont think they are looking for a million women, they are really hoping for 2500 women, the million is the weight of the women combined.
Wonder how many of them will actually look like women, and how many will look like rosie odonnel
what a bunch of stupid bitches.,
We stand together in solidarity with our partners and children for the protection of our rights, our safety, our health, and our families - recognizing that our vibrant and diverse communities are the strength of our country.
Our Mission
The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us - immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault - and our communities are hurting and scared. We are confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.
In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore. The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women's rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.
We support the advocacy and resistance movements that reflect our multiple and intersecting identities. We call on all defenders of human rights to join us. This march is the first step towards unifying our communities, grounded in new relationships, to create change from the grassroots level up. We will not rest until women have parity and equity at all levels of leadership in society. We work peacefully while recognizing there is no true peace without justice and equity for all.
HEAR OUR VOICE.
Mission & Vision
It's gonna be a bloodbath!!!!!!!!
“We cannot allow ourselves to give up, put our heads down and not hold this administration accountable for any violation of human rights or women’s rights.”
NEW YORK - Women anxious that a Donald Trump presidency in the United States could set back or destroy many of their rights are planning a massive march in Washington one day after he is sworn in, organizers said on Friday.
On Facebook, where the “Million Women March” is being organized, some 35,000 people said they would attend within the first 24 hours after it was announced, said Bob Bland, an organizer based in New York.
The march comes in response to Trump’s attitudes toward women that emerged during his campaign against Democrat Hillary Clinton, Bland told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
The Republican Trump insulted female reporters, a female political rival and other women over their looks, and a video surfaced in which he could be heard bragging about groping women and making unwanted sexual advances.
The video prompted several women to say publicly that Trump had groped them.
Trump denied their allegations and dismissed his words as “locker room talk.”
During the campaign Trump also said abortion should be largely banned, that the U.S. Supreme Court ruling Roe v Wade legalizing abortion should be overturned and that he would appoint an anti-abortion justice to the nation’s highest court.
He said women who had abortions should be punished, but later retracted this, saying that doctors who perform abortions should be punished.
Bland said plans for the march kicked off on Thursday, two days after Trump won the U.S. presidential election in a widely unexpected victory.
“A lot of women got up the second day with the same idea” for a march on Washington, and they coordinated on social media, she said.
“We need to be working together in a coherent, supportive way over the next four years, to activate more women into leadership positions, to be more politically active,” Bland said. “We cannot allow ourselves to give up, put our heads down and not hold this administration accountable for any violation of human rights or women’s rights.”
The march is being organized state by state, said Fontaine Pearson, 54, a coordinator in Memphis, Tennessee.
“We have a huge groundswell of women,” she said. “This is growing faster than anyone expected.”
The march is planned for Jan. 21, 2017, the day after Trump is to be sworn into office, at Washington, D.C.’s Lincoln Memorial.
The Lincoln Memorial was the site of the famed civil rights march in 1963, when Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech.
‘Million Women March’ To Storm D.C. For Trump Inauguration
Well, at least that's something to look forward to.
