Eric Arthur Blair
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2015
- 25,955
- 15,961
- 1,415
No. Their values are very consistent.Well they love killing babies, so this isn't necessarily a shock.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No. Their values are very consistent.Well they love killing babies, so this isn't necessarily a shock.
You have to really admire a political movement that will target and attack small children, especially one who is so delightful and bright by all accounts.
They don't let morality or ethics stand in their way. They will crush a little girl like a bug if they can.
Well done, leftists. Stay true to your Marxist-Leninist ways.
What do you expect, they parade dead migrants in front of TV camera for political gain, just as fellow Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas hide behind children while shooting missiles,hoping that they get killed so that they can use them for public consumption. The Left today is capable of anything...The level of depravity is the same.You have to really admire a political movement that will target and attack small children, especially one who is so delightful and bright by all accounts.
They don't let morality or ethics stand in their way. They will crush a little girl like a bug if they can.
Well done, leftists. Stay true to your Marxist-Leninist ways.
Alec Baldwin can appear on network television every week and make fun of President Trump. No problem.
An 8 year old girl appears on the internet making fun of AOC and liberals have silenced her, by threatening to kill her. https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/mini-aoc-ends-parody-videos-after-receiving-death-threats-harassment-from-left …
- Mark Simone on Twitter
Does it bother you when your tactics are turned on you? The right has been nasty for a long time, and it works to a point. I don't like it, but you didn't think you would be the only ones doing it forever, did you? When that obese orange republican president can molest his own daughter and get away with it, all bets are off.
Can't you just say these people suck ass and nobody should mess with a kid and be done? Stop making excuses for shitty people.
Quit whining snow flake.
Grow up, Bull.
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
Obviously not. That would be making an ass - sumption of evidence not in evidence. It would also be stupid. It would also be repeating the same wanko dumbshit move I just got done calling out over and over citing three OPs Jim the Fuck Hoft and several moron-blog links. Why the fuck would I do that immediately after calling attention TO it??
You see Spunky, just because y'all limit your imaginaria to this simplistic binary-world where everybody has to fit into one of two simplistic labels, doesn't mean the world actually ever worked that way.
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
Clearly what you don't know about Logic would fill a Library. Number one, what you just plopped is Argumentum ad Populum, as just alluded; number two, burden of proof is *****ALWAYS***** on the asserter. That would be, AGAIN, the three wackjob OPs, Jim The Fuck Hoft, and the bullshit blogs who plopped that ass-sertion I challenged any of them to document. And not a single one of them can do so.
And number three, as already noted, I don't ASS-sume shit for which I have no evidence.
You see son, I'm in no position to be speculating on what individuals sent these alleged threats, although I do know they're individuals and not Borgs, simply because we all know that even if some of us are dishonest about knowing that. None of the OPs and none of their links are in such a position. Actually we don't even know for a fact that such threats even exist. So making up fantasy stories about some Legion of Doom as the origins of things that may not even exist at all would be pointless. Even though three OPs already did just that.
Meanwhile you'll note that the question you just quoted, continues to sit untouched.
Doesn't the left do the same to trump AT LEAST every Saturday night?These stupid demented Liberals feel sorry for the Illegal filth but do death threats against an eight year girl.
MiniAOC Deletes All Social Media Accounts After Death Threats and Harassment Of Family
MiniAOC Deletes All Social Media Accounts After Death Threats and Harassment Of Family
Ava Martinez, the 8-year-old girl who perfectly impersonated Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, was forced to delete all of her social media accounts after she and her family were harassed by liberals.
Ava’s stepfather, Salvatore Schachter, who goes by “Sicken Tirade” on Twitter, said things had just gotten out of hand.
“We had to delete our accounts because the threats, harassment, negativity and hate directed at Ava and our family grew too much to bear,” Schachter told The Gateway Pundit. “The calls, texts, posts and emails from angry, hate-filled people were quite frankly, disturbing.”
“We started Mini AOC because Ava is a natural performer who loves to entertain and she enjoyed the praise she was getting for her sense of humor and charming personality,” he said. “It’s with some sadness that she will not get to share her talent with the many people who enjoyed her videos because of others who use violence as a means to an end. I do find it odd that people feel the need to protect a congressperson with such hate and disgust.”
Twitter exploded on Wednesday morning as rumors flew that someone had hacked the MiniAOC account or that Twitter had suspended it.
Someone has hacked into the Mini AOC account and deleted her tweets. pic.twitter.com/rl5fxBFwYb
— Pearl (@pearlparky) July 3, 2019
Others pointed out the hypocrisy of liberals — who endlessly preach tolerance — bashing an 8-year-old girl for simply mocking a member of Congress.
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
Obviously not. That would be making an ass - sumption of evidence not in evidence. It would also be stupid. It would also be repeating the same wanko dumbshit move I just got done calling out over and over citing three OPs Jim the Fuck Hoft and several moron-blog links. Why the fuck would I do that immediately after calling attention TO it??
You see Spunky, just because y'all limit your imaginaria to this simplistic binary-world where everybody has to fit into one of two simplistic labels, doesn't mean the world actually ever worked that way.
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
Clearly what you don't know about Logic would fill a Library. Number one, what you just plopped is Argumentum ad Populum, as just alluded; number two, burden of proof is *****ALWAYS***** on the asserter. That would be, AGAIN, the three wackjob OPs, Jim The Fuck Hoft, and the bullshit blogs who plopped that ass-sertion I challenged any of them to document. And not a single one of them can do so.
And number three, as already noted, I don't ASS-sume shit for which I have no evidence.
You see son, I'm in no position to be speculating on what individuals sent these alleged threats, although I do know they're individuals and not Borgs, simply because we all know that even if some of us are dishonest about knowing that. None of the OPs and none of their links are in such a position. Actually we don't even know for a fact that such threats even exist. So making up fantasy stories about some Legion of Doom as the origins of things that may not even exist at all would be pointless. Even though three OPs already did just that.
Meanwhile you'll note that the question you just quoted, continues to sit untouched.
And number four, you'll note that not only does that question continue to lie untouched, but your sole and complete response to this post was to affix a "funny" on it.
I accept your resignation. Be more careful next time.
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
Obviously not. That would be making an ass - sumption of evidence not in evidence. It would also be stupid. It would also be repeating the same wanko dumbshit move I just got done calling out over and over citing three OPs Jim the Fuck Hoft and several moron-blog links. Why the fuck would I do that immediately after calling attention TO it??
You see Spunky, just because y'all limit your imaginaria to this simplistic binary-world where everybody has to fit into one of two simplistic labels, doesn't mean the world actually ever worked that way.
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
Clearly what you don't know about Logic would fill a Library. Number one, what you just plopped is Argumentum ad Populum, as just alluded; number two, burden of proof is *****ALWAYS***** on the asserter. That would be, AGAIN, the three wackjob OPs, Jim The Fuck Hoft, and the bullshit blogs who plopped that ass-sertion I challenged any of them to document. And not a single one of them can do so.
And number three, as already noted, I don't ASS-sume shit for which I have no evidence.
You see son, I'm in no position to be speculating on what individuals sent these alleged threats, although I do know they're individuals and not Borgs, simply because we all know that even if some of us are dishonest about knowing that. None of the OPs and none of their links are in such a position. Actually we don't even know for a fact that such threats even exist. So making up fantasy stories about some Legion of Doom as the origins of things that may not even exist at all would be pointless. Even though three OPs already did just that.
Meanwhile you'll note that the question you just quoted, continues to sit untouched.
And number four, you'll note that not only does that question continue to lie untouched, but your sole and complete response to this post was to affix a "funny" on it.
I accept your resignation. Be more careful next time.
You questioned whether it was liberals that were responsible for the threats and harassment against this little girl.
If it wasn't liberals, then who was it?
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
Obviously not. That would be making an ass - sumption of evidence not in evidence. It would also be stupid. It would also be repeating the same wanko dumbshit move I just got done calling out over and over citing three OPs Jim the Fuck Hoft and several moron-blog links. Why the fuck would I do that immediately after calling attention TO it??
You see Spunky, just because y'all limit your imaginaria to this simplistic binary-world where everybody has to fit into one of two simplistic labels, doesn't mean the world actually ever worked that way.
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
Clearly what you don't know about Logic would fill a Library. Number one, what you just plopped is Argumentum ad Populum, as just alluded; number two, burden of proof is *****ALWAYS***** on the asserter. That would be, AGAIN, the three wackjob OPs, Jim The Fuck Hoft, and the bullshit blogs who plopped that ass-sertion I challenged any of them to document. And not a single one of them can do so.
And number three, as already noted, I don't ASS-sume shit for which I have no evidence.
You see son, I'm in no position to be speculating on what individuals sent these alleged threats, although I do know they're individuals and not Borgs, simply because we all know that even if some of us are dishonest about knowing that. None of the OPs and none of their links are in such a position. Actually we don't even know for a fact that such threats even exist. So making up fantasy stories about some Legion of Doom as the origins of things that may not even exist at all would be pointless. Even though three OPs already did just that.
Meanwhile you'll note that the question you just quoted, continues to sit untouched.
And number four, you'll note that not only does that question continue to lie untouched, but your sole and complete response to this post was to affix a "funny" on it.
I accept your resignation. Be more careful next time.
You questioned whether it was liberals that were responsible for the threats and harassment against this little girl.
If it wasn't liberals, then who was it?
I asked if you meant to suggest that it was conservatives who were responsible, and nothing in any reply from you after that made any sense.
I guess this is a new tactic of intellectual dishonesty from you, to be added to your previous tricks—post replies that are incoherent nonsense, and then claim victory when one is unable to give a rational response to an irrational posting.
And your evidence that it was "Liberals" who "silenced" her is where again?
I'll just let that sit there. Where it's been the entire time.
Is it your intention to suggest that conservatives may have been responsible for these attacks against this young girl that intimidated her into silence?
Obviously not. That would be making an ass - sumption of evidence not in evidence. It would also be stupid. It would also be repeating the same wanko dumbshit move I just got done calling out over and over citing three OPs Jim the Fuck Hoft and several moron-blog links. Why the fuck would I do that immediately after calling attention TO it??
You see Spunky, just because y'all limit your imaginaria to this simplistic binary-world where everybody has to fit into one of two simplistic labels, doesn't mean the world actually ever worked that way.
I say that if you want to claim something other than what is that prima facie obvious, then it is you who bears the burden of providing evidence to support that claim.;
Clearly what you don't know about Logic would fill a Library. Number one, what you just plopped is Argumentum ad Populum, as just alluded; number two, burden of proof is *****ALWAYS***** on the asserter. That would be, AGAIN, the three wackjob OPs, Jim The Fuck Hoft, and the bullshit blogs who plopped that ass-sertion I challenged any of them to document. And not a single one of them can do so.
And number three, as already noted, I don't ASS-sume shit for which I have no evidence.
You see son, I'm in no position to be speculating on what individuals sent these alleged threats, although I do know they're individuals and not Borgs, simply because we all know that even if some of us are dishonest about knowing that. None of the OPs and none of their links are in such a position. Actually we don't even know for a fact that such threats even exist. So making up fantasy stories about some Legion of Doom as the origins of things that may not even exist at all would be pointless. Even though three OPs already did just that.
Meanwhile you'll note that the question you just quoted, continues to sit untouched.
And number four, you'll note that not only does that question continue to lie untouched, but your sole and complete response to this post was to affix a "funny" on it.
I accept your resignation. Be more careful next time.
You questioned whether it was liberals that were responsible for the threats and harassment against this little girl.
If it wasn't liberals, then who was it?
I asked if you meant to suggest that it was conservatives who were responsible, and nothing in any reply from you after that made any sense.
I guess this is a new tactic of intellectual dishonesty from you, to be added to your previous tricks—post replies that are incoherent nonsense, and then claim victory when one is unable to give a rational response to an irrational posting.
My only question is, was the threat real or a political ploy?
If it is real then it gets my condemnation. If it's not it also gets my condemnation. Since it was reported by a rightwingnutjob source we may never know for sure.