bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,167
- 47,313
Irony!Jesus. What a maroon."Something of value" means money, dumbass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Irony!Jesus. What a maroon."Something of value" means money, dumbass.
No proof, in other words.If you haven't bothered to read Donald Jr's published emails I'm not going to hunt them down for you.Apart from a campaign conspiring to receive something of value from a foreign contributor, not a thing.There isn't the slightest thing illegal about that meeting, douchebag.
Please show us your proof along with your reliable source and link.
NopeWrong, dumbass. We're talking about the legal definition, not your personal understanding.Of course it doesThe FEC doesn't consider information about the opposition candidate to be a "thing of value" for the purpose of campaign finance, dumbass. We've been over this 1000 times since the election, but it fails to penetrate your thick skull.There are things of value other than money"Something of value" means money, dumbass. Information has never been considered to be a campaign contribution. If it was, then Hillary would still be the one who needs to go to prison.Apart from a campaign conspiring to receive something of value from a foreign contributor, not a thing.
You're a fucking dumbass, of course. This theory has been shot down 1000 times already, yet morons like you keep dragging it up.
Information is invaluable
Money is secondary
Lil Donnie is going to jailIf you haven't bothered to read Donald Jr's published emails I'm not going to hunt them down for you.Apart from a campaign conspiring to receive something of value from a foreign contributor, not a thing.There isn't the slightest thing illegal about that meeting, douchebag.
Please show us your proof along with your reliable source and link.
"Something of value" means money, dumbass.
In other words, I've played the rightard game of links dismissed before.No proof, in other words.
Hillary paid for her information, she did not conspire to receive it."Something of value" means money, dumbass. Information has never been considered to be a campaign contribution. If it was, then Hillary would still be the one who needs to go to prison.
Did you imagine that proved something?"Something of value" means money, dumbass.(a) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make
(A)
a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
Of course she "conspired to receive it," and paying for it is against the law.Hillary paid for her information, she did not conspire to receive it."Something of value" means money, dumbass. Information has never been considered to be a campaign contribution. If it was, then Hillary would still be the one who needs to go to prison.
It proved your head was up your arse when you insisted 'value' could mean only money.Did you imagine that proved something?
Cite the US code.paying for it is against the law.
It does no such thing, moron. I didn't say it only means money, but it never means information.It proved your head was up your arse when you insisted 'value' could mean only money.Did you imagine that proved something?
You have no perception of what value isIt does no such thing, moron. I didn't say it only means money, but it never means information.It proved your head was up your arse when you insisted 'value' could mean only money.Did you imagine that proved something?
Yeah, right.It does no such thing, moron. I didn't say it only means money, but it never means information.It proved your head was up your arse when you insisted 'value' could mean only money.
"Something of value" means money, dumbass.
She paid $15 million, and the information they were offering Trump was worth zero in terms of campaign finance. Why do you imagine they left after 5 minutes? No one in the Trump campaign paid for any information from Russians, period.value
The word “value” means face, par, or market value, or cost price, either wholesale or retail, whichever is greater.
Source
18 USC § 641
So Hillary paid, what, US $1 million for her information? The information the Russians were offering that Individual 1's campaign conspired to receive must have been worth at least that.
So any story that isn't on the front page every day for six months is "buried?"There is no such thing as "unbiased links."hey - here's a hint, when you are trying to make a point- try making sense first.
& uh - i never post an article from a biased link from anywhere.
no huffpo, no MSNBC, no democratic underground, none. just like i don't accept anything from FOX, gateway pundit, breitbart, american thinker....
comprende?
ya there is. when facts are omitted or skewed to become 'alternative facts' to suit a slanted political view... that is shirley biased.
huffpo will slant the same news story 180 degrees from breitbart.
I know there are biased websites. They're all biased, moron. I disputed your believe that you post links to "unbiased" websites. That takes a special kind of stupid.
the best way to get a factual story is to go to the newspapers. there is no difference in factual reporting between the NYT, WaPO, or WSJ. what separates them is the OP/ED page where the first 2 lean left & the WSJ is right leaning... but they report the actual facts equally unbiased.
damn - you really needed that to be explained to you? of course you did, since i have seen you link to breitbart many times & try to pass it off as factually true.
BWAHAHAHAHA!
The snowflake believes the reporting in the NYT isn't biased!
The news section of the WSJ is almost as leftwing as the NYT. Only the opinion section is conservative.
Do you actually believe it wasn't biased when the NYT had a front page story on Abu Ghraib every day for 6 months?
corruption & war crimes are a buried subject to you? lol... no doubt, little dude - no doubt.
NYT buried story on Harvey Weinstein's sexual predator behavior in 2004 to protect a top Democrat donor
The story of how the New York Times buried the Holocaust in its back pages : history
'Crossfire Hurricane' New York Times Report Buries Ledes | National Review
NYT buried story of Brian Williams's lie - Liberty Unyielding
There isn't the slightest thing illegal about that meeting, douchebag. On the other hand, paying Russian intelligence agents to manufacture dirt on Trump is highly illegal, not to mention traitorous, slanderous and generally downright sleazy.How is that "delusional?" You're the one who just said "it's what you all do when you really have no retort."delusional thinking suits you well.
i crossed paths with you on this board enough times to know just how delusional you are. cases in point: at least one thread where you basically were saying coal jobs [ that are coming back] will not adversely affect the areas either environmentally nor healthwise.
then of course is that whole 'there's no russian collusion because collusion isn't a legal term' line of crap you've said over & over & over as if repeating it will make it true.
Please provide your proof of collusion. Other than with the Democrats.
oh dear, you'll hafta wait for manafort's sentencing date where a lot will be revealed. see, mueller is way too smart for whittiker.... even if mueller's report is never made public or whittikers doesn't even allow congress to see it - some info will come out regardless.
but anyhoo - let's go with the trump tower meeting where donny jr met with the rooooskies with panty waist jared, & oh ya.... paul manafort. that was to get dirt on hillary, then lied about it via twits when he was aboard air force one with daddy trump telling him what to twit out. president tinkles said he didn't know about the meeting? lol... mueller has the phone records, including the 'blocked' number that traitor tot called just b4 going in to that meeting & fucked the country over.
right there. right fucking there.
Apart from a campaign conspiring to receive something of value from a foreign contributor, not a thing.There isn't the slightest thing illegal about that meeting, douchebag.
Please show us your proof along with your reliable source and link.
"Something of value" means money, dumbass. Information has never been considered to be a campaign contribution. If it was, then Hillary would still be the one who needs to go to prison.Apart from a campaign conspiring to receive something of value from a foreign contributor, not a thing.There isn't the slightest thing illegal about that meeting, douchebag.
You're a fucking dumbass, of course. This theory has been shot down 1000 times already, yet morons like you keep dragging it up.