Mississippi about to turn up the stupid?

[Inthemiddle]

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

 

[Photonic]

And once the egg is fertile.

Thanks for playing.............

So? It's still not a human being. It's a fertilized egg. Fuck, You ever get eggs from a farm instead of a supermarket? You probably get a fertilized egg one out of every couple of dozen you purchase. Just because that egg is fertilized doesn't make it a chicken.... and it certainly doesn't mean that if you were to eat that egg, that you had a chicken dinner. The truth is... when you come across a fertilized egg... you say.. "oh fuck" and throw the damned thing away.

BTW... you can tell it's fertilized because it will have a little splash of blood in the yolk.... in case you are a city dweller who hasn't seen one.

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

If that's true, than your own body is committing murder when it breaks down excess sperm for protein. Or when it sheds skin cells, or when you grow your finger nails.

 

[AmericanFirst]

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

He is making a point that you are stupid.

 

[Photonic]

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

He is making a point that you are stupid.

Well, the only thing he managed to accomplish was displaying his very own stupidity.

 

[Steelplate]

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

He is making a point that you are stupid.

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

 

[Katzndogz]

Referendum will define a fertilized egg as a legal person.

Will a miscarriage become murder? Or is that suicide?

This is a mind numbingly extreme measure. And for what? To preempt people's abortion rights? It's not going to do that. The state can define personhood all they want, but if their murder laws are extended to preclude a woman's abortion rights, the Supreme Court will knock down those statutes as violating the US Constitution. But hey, who cares about that, right? Let extremist mindsets reign supreme and enjoy the train wreck in the meantime.

Abortion is murder and no one has that right. But then idiots on the left are so delusional they think they do. If women do not want kids, stop having sex, that simple.

It isn't that simple! In most cases it might be that simple but not in all cases. A woman with a gun to her head or a knife to her throat does not have the choice not to have sex. A 12 year old girl with her father holding her down doesn't have the choice not to have sex. They may not want kids, or even want to have sex for that matter. There is some fallacy, mostly among men, that women so enjoy sex that forced sex is desired on some level. It is enjoyed and therefore, the woman is subject to the punishment of the slut who just doesn't want to keep her legs closed.

This is really an area not of the right to life, or the right to do with one's body what one chooses, it is an area of competing rights. I understand the rights of the unborn. After all, a woman who is forced to give birth to a unwanted child still lives after it is over. The unborn child's life is over, never had a chance, the woman can still do what she can to get over it. Some never do, but whose fault is that? In some cases, the penalty a woman pays with what's left of her life, is just as bad as a death.

 

[Inthemiddle]

He is making a point that you are stupid.

In other words, you got nothing so you have to resort to ad hominems.

 

[Photonic]

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

He is making a point that you are stupid.

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

To be fair being conservative doesn't do that. Any more than being liberal does.

Stupid people are stupid people.

 

[daveman]

Referendum will define a fertilized egg as a legal person.

Will a miscarriage become murder? Or is that suicide?

This is a mind numbingly extreme measure. And for what? To preempt people's abortion rights? It's not going to do that. The state can define personhood all they want, but if their murder laws are extended to preclude a woman's abortion rights, the Supreme Court will knock down those statutes as violating the US Constitution. But hey, who cares about that, right? Let extremist mindsets reign supreme and enjoy the train wreck in the meantime.

Abortion is murder and no one has that right. But then idiots on the left are so delusional they think they do. If women do not want kids, stop having sex, that simple.

No, no. People must never face the consequences of their actions. They must never take responsibility for their lives.

Right, USMB lefties?

 

[Unkotare]

a fertilized egg is the beginning of human development.

Please show where it is not.

Before the egg can be fertilized, it and the sperm cell must be produced, as living cells, from living organs in living human bodies. The production of these cells is also part of human development, so no, a fertilized egg isn't the beginning of it..

You're an idiot. Back to Jr High biology, shitforbrains.

 

[Photonic]

a fertilized egg is the beginning of human development.

Please show where it is not.

Before the egg can be fertilized, it and the sperm cell must be produced, as living cells, from living organs in living human bodies. The production of these cells is also part of human development, so no, a fertilized egg isn't the beginning of it..

You're an idiot. Back to Jr High biology, shitforbrains.

Actually, it's more in line with advanced biological concepts taught in medical schools.

 

[AmericanFirst]

What is the point of responding like this? All you've done is repeat the same position that he just debunked. Your hair is "human" but is not, itself, a human being.

He is making a point that you are stupid.

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

I have not been "blown out of the water". You would have to be right in the first place, and you are not. As far as left or right being smarter than the other, they are not. Point is what they believe. Conservative views are more in line with common sense while libtard views are in line with irresponsibility.

 

[Photonic]

He is making a point that you are stupid.

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

I have not been "blown out of the water". You would have to be right in the first place, and you are not. As far as left or right being smarter than the other, they are not. Point is what they believe. Conservative views are more in line with common sense while libtard views are in line with irresponsibility.

Prove it.

 

[daveman]

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

I have not been "blown out of the water". You would have to be right in the first place, and you are not. As far as left or right being smarter than the other, they are not. Point is what they believe. Conservative views are more in line with common sense while libtard views are in line with irresponsibility.

Prove it.

Ahem.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Referendum will define a fertilized egg as a legal person.

Will a miscarriage become murder? Or is that suicide?

This is a mind numbingly extreme measure. And for what? To preempt people's abortion rights? It's not going to do that. The state can define personhood all they want, but if their murder laws are extended to preclude a woman's abortion rights, the Supreme Court will knock down those statutes as violating the US Constitution. But hey, who cares about that, right? Let extremist mindsets reign supreme and enjoy the train wreck in the meantime.

Abortion is murder and no one has that right. But then idiots on the left are so delusional they think they do. If women do not want kids, stop having sex, that simple.

It isn't that simple! In most cases it might be that simple but not in all cases. A woman with a gun to her head or a knife to her throat does not have the choice not to have sex. A 12 year old girl with her father holding her down doesn't have the choice not to have sex. They may not want kids, or even want to have sex for that matter. There is some fallacy, mostly among men, that women so enjoy sex that forced sex is desired on some level. It is enjoyed and therefore, the woman is subject to the punishment of the slut who just doesn't want to keep her legs closed.

This is really an area not of the right to life, or the right to do with one's body what one chooses, it is an area of competing rights. I understand the rights of the unborn. After all, a woman who is forced to give birth to a unwanted child still lives after it is over. The unborn child's life is over, never had a chance, the woman can still do what she can to get over it. Some never do, but whose fault is that? In some cases, the penalty a woman pays with what's left of her life, is just as bad as a death.

You are right in one sense. I believe that to God a child is a child no matter what. It is the life of the child that matters. That child still has a right to life and the mother is still the mother, no matter what circumstances led to her pregnancy. Punish the perverts that committed the crimes but not he child. Life begins at conception.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Wow.... brilliant retort...How could we ever have doubted you? You see, this is what happens when a "Conservative" gets blown out of the water.... their Supposedly wonderful sense of "Critical thinking" goes out of the window.... and they say... because your stupid, that's why!!!

I have not been "blown out of the water". You would have to be right in the first place, and you are not. As far as left or right being smarter than the other, they are not. Point is what they believe. Conservative views are more in line with common sense while libtard views are in line with irresponsibility.

Prove it.

Don't have to go far. Clinton lying to America on national t.v. "I did not have sex with that woman". He wasn't responsible to admit in the first place he was wrong.

 

[Unkotare]

Before the egg can be fertilized, it and the sperm cell must be produced, as living cells, from living organs in living human bodies. The production of these cells is also part of human development, so no, a fertilized egg isn't the beginning of it..

You're an idiot. Back to Jr High biology, shitforbrains.

Actually, it's more in line with advanced biological concepts taught in medical schools.

You can have the tiny plastic desk next to his.

 

[Photonic]

You're an idiot. Back to Jr High biology, shitforbrains.

Actually, it's more in line with advanced biological concepts taught in medical schools.

You can have the tiny plastic desk next to his.

So sperm and eggs are non-living organisms...what?

 

[Photonic]

I have not been "blown out of the water". You would have to be right in the first place, and you are not. As far as left or right being smarter than the other, they are not. Point is what they believe. Conservative views are more in line with common sense while libtard views are in line with irresponsibility.

Prove it.

Don't have to go far. Clinton lying to America on national t.v. "I did not have sex with that woman". He wasn't responsible to admit in the first place he was wrong.

That proves that one person is a liar.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

So? It's still not a human being. It's a fertilized egg. Fuck, You ever get eggs from a farm instead of a supermarket? You probably get a fertilized egg one out of every couple of dozen you purchase. Just because that egg is fertilized doesn't make it a chicken.... and it certainly doesn't mean that if you were to eat that egg, that you had a chicken dinner. The truth is... when you come across a fertilized egg... you say.. "oh fuck" and throw the damned thing away.

BTW... you can tell it's fertilized because it will have a little splash of blood in the yolk.... in case you are a city dweller who hasn't seen one.

It's not human!?!

What is it if not human?

Chicken?

Cow?

Elephant?


A scientific textbook called "Basics of Biology" gives five characteristics of living things; these five criteria are found in all modern elementary scientific textbooks:

1. Living things are highly organized.
2. All living things have an ability to acquire materials and energy.
3. All living things have an ability to respond to their environment.
4. All living things have an ability to reproduce.
5. All living things have an ability to adapt.

According to this elementary definition of life, life begins at conception, when a sperm unites with an oocyte. From this moment, the being is highly organized, has the ability to acquire materials and energy, has the ability to respond to the environment, has the ability to adapt, and has the ability to reproduce (the cells divide, then divide again, etc., and barring pathology and pending reproductive maturity has the potential to reproduce other members of the species). Non-living things do not do these things. Even before the mother is aware that she is pregnant, a distinct life has begun to live inside her.

Didn't say it wasn't human... learn to read. I said it wasn't a human being. as far as the rest... who are you or anyone else to decide what one person does with that life?

Semantics.

A human being is human, isn't it?

So infanticide should be legal?