Mitt Romney Is the 2016 Republican Front-Runner

[House]

One word response to the OP: lolno

 

[JoeB131]

[

lets see now---------advocating for labor

1. raising the cost of healthcare for the middle class
2. adding new taxes on the middle class
3. increasing the national debt that middle class kids will have to pay
4. driving jobs out of the country with taxes and regulations
5. spending taxpayer money to bail out the UAW--GM bailout
6. longest period of high unemployment in history
7. more americans below poverty level than ever before
8. more americans on food stamps than ever before
9. the income gap between rich and poor larger than ever
10. driven energy costs up by blocking new energy exploration

Yeah, the dems have really helped "working people".

Yeah, because all those things were fine before Obama got there.

Oh, no, they weren't George W. Retard pretty much fucked all those things up.

That's a weak post if I've ever seen one.

Well, it's a reality you guys don't want to deal with, I'll admit.

Bush trashed the economy on an epic scale, but you guys like to pretend he didn't exist.

Heck, you didn't even invite him to your convention, the guy was such an embarrassment.

 

[JoeB131]

This thread is ridiculous. When your pony breaks a leg you don't run him as your sure bet in the next race.

Democrats hope he runs again..lol.. But alas, no. They will not run Mitt again, unless for some reason they find it is a strategic gain to lose 2016..

Mitt wasn't the entire problem.

Yes, he was a heartless plutocrat who couldn't help but saying weird, crazy things.

but the GOP has bigger problems. The main one being that there aren't enough angry white guys voting against their own economic interests to win elections.

 

[Politico]

The man needs to retire from public life, he's boring the fuck out of America.

I'd love to see him run against Hillary.

That's just silly. You can't have a Democrat running against a Democrat.

Seeing as he's not it's as much of a fantasy as this thread.

 

[jasonnfree]

What moderate republican has won in the recent history? GWB? If that is the best moderates can produce then I say let's try another Reagan.

Obama's reelection was a done deal as was his first election. Romney was right 47 percent would vote democrat no matter who they ran.

Romney was definitely the right man for the job but Obama was the candidate of choice, kinda like picking a rock star over a business man.

Romney was "half right".

There is probably a 47% vote baked into Democrats.

But they are not voting Democrat because they want "free stuff".

They are voting Democrat because that's the party that advocates for labor.

lets see now---------advocating for labor

1. raising the cost of healthcare for the middle class
2. adding new taxes on the middle class
3. increasing the national debt that middle class kids will have to pay
4. driving jobs out of the country with taxes and regulations
5. spending taxpayer money to bail out the UAW--GM bailout
6. longest period of high unemployment in history
7. more americans below poverty level than ever before
8. more americans on food stamps than ever before
9. the income gap between rich and poor larger than ever
10. driven energy costs up by blocking new energy exploration

Yeah, the dems have really helped "working people".

Things are much better now with Obama. The stock market's just about doubled since dubya left. I went to Mothers last night, mucho people, hard to get a clerk to help. This shopping area was a ghost town when bush left office. Things are always better when adults (democrats)are in charge. Republicans should just concentrate on their religion infested, poverty stricken red states. Maybe harrass more immigrants and females and gays while lowering wages at the same time. That's what you repubs do best.

 

[deltex1]

The more I see of Mitt lately the more I realize what we lost in 2008. We missed a man and stayed with a boy.

 

[House]

The more I see of Mitt lately the more I realize what we lost in 2008. We missed a man and stayed with a boy.

Mitt's business practices are a huge part of what brought us to this shitty economy. I'm not going to reward somebody for contributing to such a bad problem by giving them a public office.

 

[Redfish]

[

lets see now---------advocating for labor

1. raising the cost of healthcare for the middle class
2. adding new taxes on the middle class
3. increasing the national debt that middle class kids will have to pay
4. driving jobs out of the country with taxes and regulations
5. spending taxpayer money to bail out the UAW--GM bailout
6. longest period of high unemployment in history
7. more americans below poverty level than ever before
8. more americans on food stamps than ever before
9. the income gap between rich and poor larger than ever
10. driven energy costs up by blocking new energy exploration

Yeah, the dems have really helped "working people".

Yeah, because all those things were fine before Obama got there.

Oh, no, they weren't George W. Retard pretty much fucked all those things up.

All of those things were better in 2008 than they are today. Obama has screwed the middle and lower classes and helped his rich butt buddies. The gap between rich and poor has gotten larger under obama's policies. FACT

 

[Redfish]

The more I see of Mitt lately the more I realize what we lost in 2008. We missed a man and stayed with a boy.

Mitt's business practices are a huge part of what brought us to this shitty economy. I'm not going to reward somebody for contributing to such a bad problem by giving them a public office.

Yeah, creating thousands of new jobs is terrible for the economy. Are you completely