Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...I find it absurd anyone would use the term free with any confederate. I am sure their slaves were just happy they were dead. The confederates are the antithesis of what being a conservative is.
I find it absurd that you find that absurd.
Slaves, be they black or white, male or female... were recognized as something shy of Livestock. Do you find it offensive that lower forms of mammals were exploited for their means to assist in manual labor?
Or... are you content to apply modern understandings to judgment of those who lived 3 centuries ago, which is unavoidable by those mired in ignorance.
Math is Hard!
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...Math is Hard!
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Believe me, I know.
In another thread (the same thread Bripat endorsed the Confederate cause),
Keys spoke of a "loomin' Civil War" that is going to occur soon, where the south will rise again, and all the "negros" will be sent back to their "native land" (despite them being born here)...
He's quiiiiite the crazy
LOL!
The US is heading directly toward inevitable civil war... that's simply a fact of nature.
And I didn't say 'the negros...' (plural). I said > THE < NEGRO... singular. As in the brown-clown, who will soon be doing its impression of Bin Laden, trying to avoid SEAL Team 6 and most likely in his father's land, where effeminate negros blend in.
That's why the Country is not the greatest and most powerful in the world it is today--So saving the country is a bad thing....... thank god Lincoln had more senseIt is clear. Totalitarians LOVE and HONOR Dishonest Abe.
Totalitarians...birds of a feather flock together.
Lincoln didn't "save" the country. He destroyed it. He certainly destroyed the South.
I guess you endorse the explanation of that Vietnam general who said "in order to save the village we had to destroy it."
and the South is a maudlin mass of heapin' junk fluid.
The Roman Empire was larger and more powerful than the Roman REpublic.
Does that mean that the Empire was better than the Republic?
DId you really miss that implication, or were you being dishonest?
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...I find it absurd that you find that absurd.
Slaves, be they black or white, male or female... were recognized as something shy of Livestock. Do you find it offensive that lower forms of mammals were exploited for their means to assist in manual labor?
Or... are you content to apply modern understandings to judgment of those who lived 3 centuries ago, which is unavoidable by those mired in ignorance.
Math is Hard!
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Oh my... look at THAT! A RE-reconcession. How positively sweet.
Your RE-reconcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...Math is Hard!
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Oh my... look at THAT! A RE-reconcession. How positively sweet.
Your RE-reconcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Keyes' tell already? Man you give up fast.
Though I've always wondered....if you're just going to abandon the conversation and flee the topic, why bother showing up in the first place?
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...Math is Hard!
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Oh my... look at THAT! A RE-reconcession. How positively sweet.
Your RE-reconcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Keyes' tell already? Man you give up fast.
Though I've always wondered....if you're just going to abandon the conversation and flee the topic, why bother showing up in the first place?
Oh I am... Although, I am for the South invading the North... and returning the nation to its constitutional moorings, returning the negro to his native land and beatin' the man out of their women... after a proper lashin' of course.
OH!~ Wait... that's the loomin' civil war.
Freeing the slaves was divine providence... and it had zip to do with the south leaving the Union. That war started over the same thing that is going to cause the up and coming war: Relativism.
But in fairness... every war is caused by Relativism.
Where_Are_My_Keys really really really lost his keys, attached to his brain, long ago...Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
(Reader, once again, the key to defeating Leftists in debate is as follows:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.)
It's not his fault you believe the Civil War occurred three hundred years ago.
Oh my... look at THAT! A RE-reconcession. How positively sweet.
Your RE-reconcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
Keyes' tell already? Man you give up fast.
Though I've always wondered....if you're just going to abandon the conversation and flee the topic, why bother showing up in the first place?
Yeah. Nobody pays attention to him. He's a self proclaimed "sovereign" sitting there jerking himself off.
^^^That is, bar none, my favorite quote from my discussions here
Thing, now?I've seen at least three conservatives on this site talk about how Lincoln and the Union were wrong, and that the Confederacy should have been allowed to secede the way they did, and were on the right side of history..
Is this a popular stance among conservatives of today? Are they really pro-Confederacy when they look back on the Civil War? Or are there just a couple crazies here and there?
(This thread may also help the 'Gay Marriage' thread from being further derailed with Civil War arguments. Figured it was worth a shot haha)
New York lost in its attempt to put in a clause about withdrawing if 33 amendments were not allowed to be considered in a later convention. After being shot down, New York still voted to ratify.I just quoted the New York ratification document. It reserves the right of the people to secede from the Union.
I quoted New York's ratification document. It reserves the right to secede.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
New York lost in its attempt to put in a clause about withdrawing if 33 amendments were not allowed to be considered in a later convention. After being shot down, New York still voted to ratify.
I quoted New York's ratification document. It reserves the right to secede.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
New York lost in its attempt to put in a clause about withdrawing if 33 amendments were not allowed to be considered in a later convention. After being shot down, New York still voted to ratify.
I quoted New York's ratification document. It reserves the right to secede.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
I seriously think "the lost keys" man might be replying from an insane asylum.^^^That is, bar none, my favorite quote from my discussions here
Its a classic! I've already got it bookmarked. My favorite is how Keyes is desperately backpedalling trying to tell us that he didn't mean anything plural when he referred to 'the negro'. Which is just obliterated by his support of 'beatin' the man out of their women'.
Um, in English you don't use 'their' to refer to the singular. But only the plural.
Like I said, you're already mining a vein of batshit by even replying to the guy. He's not entirely with us.
I quoted New York's ratification document. It reserves the right to secede.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
...Who are you?
I quoted New York's ratification document. It reserves the right to secede.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
...Who are you?
"Most history books and documentaries that discuss slavery are full of tragic stories about the bad aspects of slavery, but they rarely mention the good aspects of the institution." - Mike Griffith
Google it.
You dishonestly snipped that quote--here's the whole quote:
"Most history books and documentaries that discuss slavery are full of tragic stories about the bad aspects of slavery, but they rarely mention the good aspects of the institution. Historians typically cite the worst cases of mistreatment and abuse but ignore or minimize the far more numerous cases of humane treatment, mutual respect, and genuine friendship. True, the good aspects of slavery don't outweigh the fact that slavery was wrong, but they should be noted in the interest of fairness and historical truth."
And what were the "good aspects" of slavery? Well, many slaves learned a trade that they were able to use after emancipation. Many slaves formed lasting friendships with the white family on the plantation and stayed close or stayed in touch with them long after emancipation. Many slaves were converted to Christianity. The vast majority of slaves had a better standard of living--in terms of food, clothing, housing, and work hours--than they would have had in Africa during that period. Most slaves were not abused, and many had easier lives than many Northern industrial workers in that era, as many NORTHERN workers rights advocates noted at the time.
Mike Griffith: Anything after your proclamation of the "good aspects of the slavery" - is something most normal folks would stop at and say - whoa, this is really *$#*$ insane. I should stop here and delete that.
I seriously think "the lost keys" man might be replying from an insane asylum.^^^That is, bar none, my favorite quote from my discussions here
Its a classic! I've already got it bookmarked. My favorite is how Keyes is desperately backpedalling trying to tell us that he didn't mean anything plural when he referred to 'the negro'. Which is just obliterated by his support of 'beatin' the man out of their women'.
Um, in English you don't use 'their' to refer to the singular. But only the plural.
Like I said, you're already mining a vein of batshit by even replying to the guy. He's not entirely with us.
Here's the NY ratification document:
Avalon Project - Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York July 26 1788
Show us. Don't tell us.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
...Who are you?
I'm more than a single letter.
Told you I was done with you, watch your own lane.
Huh? Dude, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, just say so.
But you don't actually get to dictate to anyone what they post. You know that, right?
What ever, go away child.
...Who are you?
I'm more than a single letter.
I didn't want anybody to have a biased attitude against me based on my username, so I just chose a neutral letter.
For instance, with you, having Texas in your username, I automatically associate you with ten-gallon hats and idiot of the decade Rick Perry.
Yeah, you're both a couple of comic geniuses. I'll bet you're a big hit on the short bus tour.dammit. -S- beat me by a second.
lol
I honestly just thought you needed help understanding the word 'verbatim'.
I'm actually still not convinced that wasn't the case
I'm totally convinced that you're a lying numskull.
If only you had some sort of evidence..
ev·i·dence
ˈevədəns/
noun
- 1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
