Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can agree that skepticism is a part of science.
Skepticism is science... your denial of that is anti-science.
Disprove the evidence then. I laid it out and provided the context. I used facts. You have demonstrated that you do not have even a cursory knowledge of the hypothesis. Your faith and screaming at the sky are not proof of anything.I can agree that skepticism is a part of science.
I've in fact asked for a skeptic's rebuttal of creation being a lie and is therefore not settled science.
I'm always open to valid evidence that is based on more than just somebody's faith.
Creation of what?I've in fact asked for a skeptic's rebuttal of creation being a lie and is therefore not settled science.
I've lost track of the hypothesis and never did hear anything that pertains to evidence?Disprove the evidence then. I laid it out and provided the context. I used facts. You have demonstrated that you do not have even a cursory knowledge of the hypothesis. Your faith and screaming at the sky are not proof of anything.
Actually it is saying that. Why else would you say the science is settled unless you were saying it to discourage investigation? There's no other reason to say the science is settled.No. Sometimes the science is settled.
That in no way is saying that it needs to remain settled.
No, I disagree. Some science is settled and it will remain settled until it becomes 'not' settled.Actually it is saying that. Why else would you say the science is settled unless you were saying it to discourage investigation? There's no other reason to say the science is settled.
I've warned you about that sort of behaviour.So I think you are full of shit.
I know 'something', as is mostly true of all laypersons. I trust the 95% or more of mainstream climate scientists.I think you don't know the first thing about the earth's climate and you have absolutely no business debating the earth's climate until you do. Is that really too much to ask?
As I thought. You have no concept of the science behind CAGW. You are parroting what you are told to parrot.I've lost track of the hypothesis and never did hear anything that pertains to evidence?
This topic has become N.A. for me, at least until you can set it back on course billie?
LOL.... More appeals to authority and no knowledge of the hypothesis itself.No, I disagree. Some science is settled and it will remain settled until it becomes 'not' settled.
I've chosen 'creation' as an example of settled science being it's disproval.
I've warned you about that sort of behaviour.
I know 'something', as is mostly true of all laypersons. I trust the 95% or more of mainstream climate scientists.
It's as simple as that for me. I can wait for evidence to the contrary but I'm not going to pretend to be the expert myself.
If you have a point to make, do so and then we'll try to get an answer from the experts!
I don't consider the Mises Institute to be reliable information coming from climate science experts.LOL.... More appeals to authority and no knowledge of the hypothesis itself.
As I pointed out earlier, your 95 and 97% 'consensus' has been shown nothing more than a deception and a lie.
Here is very good article to start with, to learn the basics. The Skeptic's Case | David M.W. Evans
www.desmog.com
Standard alarmist drivel.... I don't like what it says so I deny that it is credible.I don't consider the Mises Institute to be reliable information coming from climate science experts.
LOL... He understands the math and the process. Something you do not grasp.David Evans
David Evans Credentials Background David M. W. Evans is an editor for the Australian edition of GoldNerds, a company that sells information about gold companies to investors. He also does private mathematics research. Evans works alongside his wife Joanne Nova at Science Speak, a group that...
A quick read to explain why David is not a good choice!
Billie bob blew it when he referred to David Evans as his expert!pretty skeptical Billy_Bob is a physicist
Deflection... Its all you have...David Evans
David Evans Credentials Background David M. W. Evans is an editor for the Australian edition of GoldNerds, a company that sells information about gold companies to investors. He also does private mathematics research. Evans works alongside his wife Joanne Nova at Science Speak, a group that...
A quick read to explain why David is not a good choice!
You can disagree all you want but you don't know what you are talking about. The only reason that idiots like yourself say the science is settled is to discourage investigation. So no one in science ever says the science is settled except idiots who want to discourage more scientific investigation.No, I disagree. Some science is settled and it will remain settled until it becomes 'not' settled.
I've chosen 'creation' as an example of settled science being it's disproval.
Warn away, but for the love of God please stop making asinine comments like...I've warned you about that sort of behaviour.
No. You don't. You don't know anything. You are completely devoid of understanding of what drives the earth's climate. Nada. Zip. Zilch.I know 'something', as is mostly true of all laypersons. I trust the 95% or more of mainstream climate scientists.
It's as simple as that for me. I can wait for evidence to the contrary but I'm not going to pretend to be the expert myself.
If you have a point to make, do so and then we'll try to get an answer from the experts!
Some science is settled and it will remain settled until it becomes 'not' settled.
