Montana Atty General Says Teaching CRT is a Violation of Law

Define CRT for us.

"telling employees to be “less white”"

But it is nice to know that: " There are many bad ideas, such as the Communist Manifesto, and fraudulent curriculums, like the 1619 Project, that do not violate civil rights laws when taught in Montana schools.

Communist Manifesto?????
 
Bodecea is really triggered by this ruling. Phucking cry more you racist pos.
 
"is a subversion technique used to erode western societies so that they will accept Marxism."

Hahahaha, lets not agree to that.
Here's some light reading on that, by the way.

CRT began in the United States in the post–civil rights era, as 1960s landmark civil rights laws were being eroded and schools were being re-segregated.[15] With racial inequalities persisting even after civil rights legislation was enacted, CRT scholars in the 1970s and 1980s began reworking and expanding critical legal studies (CLS) theories on class, economic structure and the law[16] to examine the role of U.S. law in perpetuating racism.[17] CRT, a framework of analysis grounded in critical theory,[18]


 
Do you agree that CRT is a derivative of Critical Theory?

Let's start there.


(hint: CRT author admits it)
let's start here:

Crenshaw—who coined the term “CRT”—notes that CRT is not a noun, but a verb. It cannot be confined to a static and narrow definition but is considered to be an evolving and malleable practice. It critiques how the social construction of race and institutionalized racism perpetuate a racial caste system that relegates people of color to the bottom tiers. CRT also recognizes that race intersects with other identities, including sexuality, gender identity, and others. CRT recognizes that racism is not a bygone relic of the past. Instead, it acknowledges that the legacy of slavery, segregation, and the imposition of second-class citizenship on Black Americans and other people of color continue to permeate the social fabric of this nation.

 
Here's some light reading on that, by the way.

CRT began in the United States in the post–civil rights era, as 1960s landmark civil rights laws were being eroded and schools were being re-segregated.[15] With racial inequalities persisting even after civil rights legislation was enacted, CRT scholars in the 1970s and 1980s began reworking and expanding critical legal studies (CLS) theories on class, economic structure and the law[16] to examine the role of U.S. law in perpetuating racism.[17] CRT, a framework of analysis grounded in critical theory,[18]


History of ..not a definition....once again you show us your intellectual weaknesses and inadequacy
 
History of ..not a definition....once again you show us your intellectual weaknesses and inadequacy
Definition is "a derivative of Critical Theory" which is entirely adequate for people who are not dumb fucks, like you.

Still waiting on your inadequate ass to even ATTEMPT to provide a definition.
 
Crenshaw—who coined the term “CRT”—notes that CRT is not a noun, but a verb. It cannot be confined to a static and narrow definition but is considered to be an evolving and malleable practice.
Of course. That is exactly what critical theory is intended to do. ALWAYS changing so nobody can keep up and they will ALWAYS be "wrong."

You see CriticalTheory play all around us.

The idea is to constantly evolve words and meanings so that your target can be always wrong.

Where do you think political correctness came from?

You saw it on display in the Coney Barrett hearings when the idiot from Hawaii corrected the nominee on "sexual preference." That is the essence of all of this nonsense. The term sexual preference was used for decades until that time when it could be used to discredit someone who is a political target.

You see it here in this very thread.

bodecea, whether his dumb ass knows it or not, is exercising CriticalTheory.

The idea is to never give the right answer, but only to be critical of others. Critical of the "system" critical of enemies.

I will never get an honest discussion from him or anyone else touting CRT because the entire goal is to never provide an honest answer. Only to critique.
 
Of course. That is exactly what critical theory is intended to do. ALWAYS changing so nobody can keep up and they will ALWAYS be "wrong."

You see CriticalTheory play all around us.

The idea is to constantly evolve words and meanings so that your target can be always wrong.

Where do you think political correctness came from?

You saw it on display in the Coney Barrett hearings when the idiot from Hawaii corrected the nominee on "sexual preference." That is the essence of all of this nonsense. The term sexual preference was used for decades until that time when it could be used to discredit someone who is a political target.

You see it here in this very thread.

bodecea, whether his dumb ass knows it or not, is exercising CriticalTheory.

The idea is to never give the right answer, but only to be critical of others. Critical of the "system" critical of enemies.

I will never get an honest discussion from him or anyone else touting CRT because the entire goal is to never provide an honest answer. Only to critique.

I'll take the authors interpretation instead.

"It critiques how the social construction of race and institutionalized racism perpetuate a racial caste system that relegates people of color to the bottom tiers. CRT also recognizes that race intersects with other identities, including sexuality, gender identity, and others. CRT recognizes that racism is not a bygone relic of the past. Instead, it acknowledges that the legacy of slavery, segregation, and the imposition of second-class citizenship on Black Americans and other people of color continue to permeate the social fabric of this nation."
 
I'll take the authors interpretation instead.

"It critiques how the social construction of race and institutionalized racism perpetuate a racial caste system that relegates people of color to the bottom tiers. CRT also recognizes that race intersects with other identities, including sexuality, gender identity, and others. CRT recognizes that racism is not a bygone relic of the past. Instead, it acknowledges that the legacy of slavery, segregation, and the imposition of second-class citizenship on Black Americans and other people of color continue to permeate the social fabric of this nation."
Summary: America is fundamentally flawed

And the solution is......

Do I really need to say it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top