Thats fine. But don't pretend that 6 first hand accounts backed up by dozens of decade old corroborating witnesses who the accusers told about the incidents isn't evidence. It very much is and it is proof for most except the wingnuts like yourself that decide to defend a molester to promote your political agenda. SickSame... Which is why I wouldn't call on Moore to be prosecuted. In the absence of hard proof or a formal trial we are left with common sense and the so called "court of public opinion". We deal with cases like this all the time in school when there is a "he said / she said" situation. Any teacher or parent with multiple kids is well aware of this. In these cases you listen to the accounts of both sides and you draw your conclusion based on whose story is the most credible. Thats whats happening here. The accusers and the dozens of corroborating witnesses are overwhelmingly more credible than the weak defense that Moore put out. I really shouldn't have to explain all this to you.Wow, you broke the case!!!! Nice work. Gotta love idiot logicHave anything more than a 40 year old allegation that Moore molested any kids?
Last I read, pedophiles don't change. If anything, they typically get worse and molest more kids over time.
My logic is "innocent until proven guilty"
What's yours
Credibility in the absence of proof is not credible to me. Especially when the allegation is 40 years old.
You say this even as you continue to defend the most extreme form of child molestation there is.
Huh.