jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,224
- 29,150
- 2,180
Activists against what exactly?We’ll we have an activist court now and you love it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Activists against what exactly?We’ll we have an activist court now and you love it
Well, it is human life so I see no need for debate. Here's some irony, the civil war, as you know, was fought over states rights. Now, abortion has been sent to the states, states rights. The divisions will only deepen.
What right? No one has privacy differencesPRIVACY is a right under the 14th amendment. Nothing is more private than the decision to have a baby.
Abortion was fully legal when the Constitution was written. It was made illegal when women first started to demand the vote.
Now women are demanding power and the first thing conservatives have done is to prove to women that they have no power. It's not going over well.
The question is when it should be considered, legally, to be a separate person. Simply because it's "human life" doesn't make it a person. Most things that are alive aren't people, including human cells.Well, it is human life so I see no need for debate.
I'm still holding out hope that we can produce leadership that rejects the "culture war" mentality and promotes policy that everyone can accept - if not completely agree with. We've got to end the "in-your-face", "elections-have-consequences" mindset and deal with the fact that we are one nation. Either that, or send your kids off to fight a civil war and hope they survive. I'd certainly like to avoid that.Here's some irony, the civil war, as you know, was fought over states rights. Now, abortion has been sent to the states, states rights. The divisions will only deepen.
No it's not. It a potential baby, but it's not a baby yet.
A human is a human. What else is it?egally, to be a separate person. Simply because it's "human life" doesn't make it person
HumanNo it's not. It a potential baby, but it's not a baby yet.
The question is when it should be considered, legally, to be a separate person. Simply because it's "human life" doesn't make it person. Most things that are alive aren't persons, including human cells.
I'm still holding out hope that we can produce leadership that rejects the "culture war" mentality and promotes policy that everyone can accept - if not completely agree with. We've got to end the "in-your-face", "elections-have-consequences" mindset and deal with the fact that we are one nation. Either that, or send your kids off to fight a civil war and hope they survive. I'd certainly like to avoid that.
I agree, the doctor bills should be helped by the father....who is against that?It does seem that child support should be paid from the moment of conception.
Huh?So you ONLY want women to be responsible for pregnancy
That’s what I’ve been saying
The demofks are in that queball corner now. Now men are necessary exactly proving the baby is a babyI agree, the doctor bills should be helped by the father....who is against that?
Again, it's more leftwing reaction stupd shit. The left is just fucking dumb as a box of rocks. They are children who didn't get their way, so the tantrums are going be really really dumb AND glorious, I will have material to stomp lefties for months!!!!!!!!!!!Sen. Tina Maharath (D-Canal Winchester) said her bill would allow anyone who becomes pregnant to file a civil suit against the person who impregnated them — even if it happened as a result of consensual sex.![]()
Ohio bill would allow pregnant people to sue over unintended pregnancies - WOUB Public Media
COLUMBUS, Ohio (Statehouse News Bureau) — With Ohio’s new six-week abortion ban in place, a Democratic state lawmaker says it’s time for the Ohio Legislature to give consideration to her... Read Morewoub.org
“Regardless of the circumstances. I felt it was important to have that vague language due to the fact that abortion is now banned here in the state of Ohio,” Maharath said.
So much reactionary bullshit going on, NO ONE is thinking.
So does this mean males can sue birth control providers for not stopping the pregnancy?
WTF is wrong with people SMH
LOL, imagine that, when it comes to money, they are all about men, the rest, they ignore men....fuck these woke cum catchers.The demofks are in that queball corner now. Now men are necessary
It’s so easyAgain, it's more leftwing reaction stupd shit. The left is just fucking dumb as a box of rocks. They are children who didn't get their way, so the tantrums are going be really really dumb AND glorious, I will have material to stomp lefties for months!!!!!!!!!!!
Let the mocking begin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A spermatozoon isn’t a life.Life begins at ejaculation. Every sperm is sacred. Masturbation is MURDER!!!!
Yep, I'll have tons of material and I will be so happy to dunk and dunk and dunk, there will be so much dunking I'll get tired of it.......hahhahhahhahah nope I will never get tired of it!It’s so easy
Privacy isn't a right in the Constitution at all. If you read the decision, it goes into the legality of abortion in great detail. And, the history of that legality.PRIVACY is a right under the 14th amendment. Nothing is more private than the decision to have a baby.
Abortion was fully legal when the Constitution was written. It was made illegal when women first started to demand the vote.
Now women are demanding power and the first thing conservatives have done is to prove to women that they have no power. It's not going over well.
I’m right there with you doing the same dunksYep, I'll have tons of material and I will be so happy to dunk and dunk and dunk, there will be so much dunking I'll get tired of it.......hahhahhahhahah nope I will never get tired of it!
Just like demofk to go off the cliffA spermatozoon isn’t a life.