Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the fact is even Stockman admits his numbers are flawed in his own report! He says you have to "allow for" people he didn't allow for!Facts are facts...but not to the Left.I say you have to be incredibly stupid to swallow Stockman's bullshit. But YOU will!Hey Leftnutter, David Stockman (hero of leftists who hate Reagan and his supply side economics) says the unemployment rate is REALLY 43%. What say you?Great news for the 4th of July
Employers added 223 000 jobs in June
Employers added 223,000 jobs in June as the labor market posted a third straight month of solid gains after a winter downturn.
The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
Businesses added 223,000,000 jobs, led by professional and business services, health care and retail. Employment was unchanged in the public sector.
Now, in preparation for the "Economy must fail" crowd....These were not "burger flipping jobs", they were not part time jobs and they were not government hiring
Feel free to start your diversions about the labor participation rate
.
The Warren Buffett Economy Why Its Days Are Numbered Part 4 David Stockman s Contra Corner
...and besides I thought you lefties loved Stockman for dumping on Reagan...
Republicans blame Frank because he is gay
There is now way a single Congressman can crash the economy. Which law did he pass that crashed the economy in six months?
Not a problem since not 100% of the 43% are on welfare.How are you going to keep a welfare/warfare state viable with 43% of working age people, not working?I say he's fucking retarded. The unemployment rate measures how many people are looking for work -- not how many people don't want to work.Hey Leftnutter, David Stockman (hero of leftists who hate Reagan and his supply side economics) says the unemployment rate is REALLY 43%. What say you?Great news for the 4th of July
Employers added 223 000 jobs in June
Employers added 223,000 jobs in June as the labor market posted a third straight month of solid gains after a winter downturn.
The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
Businesses added 223,000,000 jobs, led by professional and business services, health care and retail. Employment was unchanged in the public sector.
Now, in preparation for the "Economy must fail" crowd....These were not "burger flipping jobs", they were not part time jobs and they were not government hiring
Feel free to start your diversions about the labor participation rate
.
The Warren Buffett Economy Why Its Days Are Numbered Part 4 David Stockman s Contra Corner
Holyfuckingshit!People on here from the left want to blame GW for the meltdown. Well, you can if you want to say he didn't prevent it, but the real driver behind the meltdown was Barney Frank. Ever wonder why he retired, lol.
No, they have not both performed the same economicly. One led us into one of the worst recessions ever and the other one led us out.As far as Obama or GW being better or worse, who cares, they both stunk econically. Neither republicans or democrats have sole possession of good, or bad, ideas or Presidents. Were it not for a few tax cuts, we could all say we have had GW or Obama in office for 16 years. If you like Obama, you must also like Bush; blasphemy I know, but besides 2 wars, what exactly is the difference in performance? Not much. You can/could claim Obama has done better if you like, but then I have to say he should have being allowed to spend 3 times as much.
Clinton did not "get some of his left put in" towards the end of his presidency. He had a rightwing House and Senate for the last six years. WTF are you talking about?The real question is...........do you want more Bush Obama for another 4 years? Or rather, do you wish a different approach?
If anyone wants to check, since Reagan we have started moving left. Clinton had a very good economy, but as some of his left got put in, we went into recession at the end, and been going left and down ever since. Always remember, Clinton dealt with the contract with America republicans, and between them, they came damn close to balancing the budget. Sure, a few accounting tricks were used, but notice that today; even with accounting tricks, they can't get withing 5 football fields of even attempting to say we are close. That is BOTH partys!
So I say........it is NOT the moniker over the head of the candidate, it is what they will do, or attempt to do; and if they are going to do the same damn thing that GW and Obama did while spending us into oblivion, let illegals in to soak up our tax dollars, screw business so they want to leave, then why would any thinking American (notice I said AMERICAN, not illegal alien) vote for that?
Ignorance is doing the same thing over, and over, and over again, and expecting different results. What is even more ignorant, is claiming that because one person has an R, and one person has a D in front of their name but almost did exactly the same thing economically, that one was good, and one was bad; when everyone with 1/2 a brain is well aware, they BOTH SUCKED!
A vote for Jebster or rich Hilly, is a vote for the status quo. If you think this is all going swimmingly, then by all means, vote for one of the Washington cronies. By the time we get another chance to change things, it will be far worse, or maybe even over.
Which is why Bush gets the lion's share of the blame. Bush had as much power as 535 Barney Franks'.Frank became chairman in Jan 2007 with the real estate collapse starting in July 2007
Conservatives would have you believe that people bought houses, moved in and defaulted all within six months. That is some meltdown
Utter Bullshit and you know it.
People blame Frank because of his unapologetic bald face lying to protect the system that he damn well knew was going to blow. If he didn't know, that is actually worse.
Frank not only protected the uber corrupt F&F - he sought to expand them.
Frank, like Bush, didn't create the cause of the meltdown. Both ignored it, both protected it.
Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 electionWhich is why Bush gets the lion's share of the blame. Bush had as much power as 535 Barney Franks'.Frank became chairman in Jan 2007 with the real estate collapse starting in July 2007
Conservatives would have you believe that people bought houses, moved in and defaulted all within six months. That is some meltdown
Utter Bullshit and you know it.
People blame Frank because of his unapologetic bald face lying to protect the system that he damn well knew was going to blow. If he didn't know, that is actually worse.
Frank not only protected the uber corrupt F&F - he sought to expand them.
Frank, like Bush, didn't create the cause of the meltdown. Both ignored it, both protected it.
Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 election
It was important because it shows how Bush didn't want to hurt Republicans in the 2008 election.Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 election
Oh so this is what is important?
Who is the biggest liar?
The only reason I answer any of your post any more is that I have seen, out of your 90,000+ posts - 5 or 6 times you will speak out against someone in your beloved party, and sometimes I am bored enough to see if I can get you to do it again.
It was important because it shows how Bush didn't want to hurt Republicans in the 2008 election.Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 election
Oh so this is what is important?
Who is the biggest liar?
The only reason I answer any of your post any more is that I have seen, out of your 90,000+ posts - 5 or 6 times you will speak out against someone in your beloved party, and sometimes I am bored enough to see if I can get you to do it again.
Really? 500 posts per month, huh?It was important because it shows how Bush didn't want to hurt Republicans in the 2008 election.Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 election
Oh so this is what is important?
Who is the biggest liar?
The only reason I answer any of your post any more is that I have seen, out of your 90,000+ posts - 5 or 6 times you will speak out against someone in your beloved party, and sometimes I am bored enough to see if I can get you to do it again.
Well Faun, you are better than your pal RW. You have only 500 posts per month, so eventhough I think you are sharing underwear in that "parents basement," I will give you a pass.
I would like to commen RW for attempting to shut all of us up by using the liberal buzzword, "gay."
I would also like to commend Faun for attempting to "seperate" Obama from GW, without ever addressing how he should be better 3 times better, because he spent 3 times as much money that we do not have.
No fellas, (girls?) your PC crap isn't going to work with me, so sorry.
Personally, I like the way you try and slip all of the numbers in and get the debate going that way. All about the numbers, lol. Then you slip in a few lefty platitudes so that those who are bored with the numbers only see that.
Pure brilliance, but it is not gonna work with me! You can't win the debate, I know it, you know it, and 3/4s of everyone else on here knows it also, even if they are cheering for you, lol.
Carry on, so we can carry your dizzy ideas out of here in a wooden box!
P.S. Do you guys share your underwear, then claimed you changed? Just wondering.
Carry on leftists. It will be many of our personal pleasure to dismantle your debate points; while you are in the middle of swapping underwear, of course!
yeah sure it did. and before Obambam leaves we'll be a 0%. you can count on it
all on a piddly: 200, 000 jobs. That should whittle down those 93MILLION out of work
because he's blocking the BUILDING OF A STADIUM and the jobs it would bring all because of a NAME of a football team.
mark my words, watch it drop 1% every MONTH up until the elections. lol
What mindless babblingIt was important because it shows how Bush didn't want to hurt Republicans in the 2008 election.Bush denied we were in a recession until after the 2008 election
Oh so this is what is important?
Who is the biggest liar?
The only reason I answer any of your post any more is that I have seen, out of your 90,000+ posts - 5 or 6 times you will speak out against someone in your beloved party, and sometimes I am bored enough to see if I can get you to do it again.
Well Faun, you are better than your pal RW. You have only 500 posts per month, so eventhough I think you are sharing underwear in that "parents basement," I will give you a pass.
I would like to commen RW for attempting to shut all of us up by using the liberal buzzword, "gay."
I would also like to commend Faun for attempting to "seperate" Obama from GW, without ever addressing how he should be better 3 times better, because he spent 3 times as much money that we do not have.
No fellas, (girls?) your PC crap isn't going to work with me, so sorry.
Personally, I like the way you try and slip all of the numbers in and get the debate going that way. All about the numbers, lol. Then you slip in a few lefty platitudes so that those who are bored with the numbers only see that.
Pure brilliance, but it is not gonna work with me! You can't win the debate, I know it, you know it, and 3/4s of everyone else on here knows it also, even if they are cheering for you, lol.
Carry on, so we can carry your dizzy ideas out of here in a wooden box!
P.S. Do you guys share your underwear, then claimed you changed? Just wondering.
Carry on leftists. It will be many of our personal pleasure to dismantle your debate points; while you are in the middle of swapping underwear, of course!
The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
Better than if the Republican had won the election. Don't forget -- Romney said he wouldn't have the unemployment rate down below 6% until the end of 2016.The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
Thank your lucky stars the Democrat won and got the unemployment rate to under 6% two years ahead of the best Romney could have done.Better than if the Republican had won the election. Don't forget -- Romney said he wouldn't have the unemployment rate down below 6% until the end of 2016.The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
5.3% unemployment is the "worst recovery"?The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
If you believe lies, which apparently you do.5.3% unemployment is the "worst recovery"?The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
Obamas unemployment numbers are now better than Reagans
5.3% unemployment is the "worst recovery"?The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
Obamas unemployment numbers are now better than Reagans
If you believe lies, which apparently you do.5.3% unemployment is the "worst recovery"?The unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.3%, the lowest since April 2008, the Labor Department
.
thus making this the worst recovery since the Great Depression. Why not make liberals illegal as our Founders intended so we don't go through this again and again??
Obamas unemployment numbers are now better than Reagans
