Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
- May 3, 2011
- 102,030
- 36,097
Yes. And? Who stated that they didn't test blood before giving it to patients?
Also, it's also a huge waste of time.
Look, I hate to sound like a homophobe, because I'm not, but there is a precedent for it. Read this link: Basic Statistics | Statistics and Surveillance | Topics | CDC HIV/AIDS
It's completely unfair, but until we rid people of the virus, then we're going to have to cut off people from donating blood who are at-risk. Like if it turned out that people of Asian descent had some sort of horrible disease in their bloodstream (lets call it Chinkinitus), then I'd have no choice but to suck it up and not donate until they figured something out.
The thing is, it isn't only gays who have HIV. Prostitutes often have it. Drug uses often have it. And 'ordinary' people have it too, in increasing numbers.
Prostitutes and IV drug users are also prohibited from giving blood.