Or a pressure cooker bomb.Are you saying they would have fought bare knuckled to the death? I'm guessing they were both too plastered for that.But if neither of them had guns, a minor rear-ender would not have ended in a death and a serious injury. Maybe a bloody nose.The right to bear arms doesn't mean the right to use firearms in frontier justice.
Rdean has a problem with understanding right and wrong......he is a left wing regressive and as we all know, their brains do not process facts, the truth, or reality properly.....and they really can't process the difference between right and wrong....
Considering that there were 8,124 gun murders in 2014.....but each year Americans use guns to stop violent criminal attack and save lives 1,500,000 times according to bill clinton.......those numbers are hard for him to understand.......
Also...considering that there are now357,000,000 million guns in private hands...that means 356,991,876 million were not used to commit murder.....
So 356,991,876 million people owned, and carried guns for self defense and did not commit murder with those guns...
13 million Americans now own and actually carry their guns.......
and 8,124 gun murders happened...and according to research, 90% of those committing murder are already convicted criminals, and 70-80% of their victims are already convicted criminals....so normal people...carrying guns....do not randomly commit acts of murder with them.
and as more Americans own and carry guns....our gun murder rate has actually gone down....every year we have increased gun ownership......
So not one thing rdean implies with this thread has anything to do with the truth, the facts or the reality of gun ownership in the United STates....
It might not have. There's no way to say it wouldn't happened, anyway.
No, I'm saying that a gun isn't their only option. They could easily produce a club, or an edged weapon.