Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 101,015
- 81,386
- 3,645
Haha, I don't play this game.What good does it do a person?
Go ahead and assert it does no good and argue why.
Then we will scrutinize your point.
And, go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, I don't play this game.What good does it do a person?
No it isn't. It might have been placed on a pedestal to be worshipped as such, but biology does not need evolution. If one denied evolution it would have no impact on practical biology, one could do the work without issues.It's the entire basis of biology. And biology is the entire basis of medicine.
A belief in evolution is no more relevant to the study of the animal kingdom than atheism is relevant to physics.When someone refuses to accept and doesnt even understand these simple facts, they ask dumb questions, like,
"Why should evolution be taught in science class?"
As we see here.
OK so you can't tell me what good it does a person to believe evolution, OK.Haha, I don't play this game.
Go ahead and assert it does no good and argue why.
Then we will scrutinize your point.
And, go.
It of course is the entire basis of biology, as anyone who has taken biology-- and any biologist -- would attest.No it isn't
Like this.A belief in evolution is no more relevant to the study of the animal kingdom than atheism is relevant to physics.
Tell me then, what is ridiculous about this:It of course is the entire basis of biology, as anyone who has taken biology-- and any biologist -- would attest.
It's how we understand physiology... it's how we understand modifying cells to acheive certain behaviors, in an effort to prolong our lives... it's how we know how to study certain animals to better understand the human body...
I really don't have to do any work to dispel this ridiculous claim.
In fact, highlighting it does a lot of work to discredit you from the start.
If this is what we can expect from the bottom of the barrel you are now drawing from, I don't think any more effort is required on my part.
Richard Porter was Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, from 1990–95 (in universities in the UK and many British Commonwealth countries, the title ‘Professor’ is given only to the highest rank of university lecturers).
Then he was Director of Education and Training for the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh from 1995–97.
He has published over 120 papers in peer-reviewed journals (50% on spinal disorders), mostly as senior author. He is the author of five textbooks and over 30 contributory chapters. In 2001 Edinburgh University awarded him a D.Sc. degree for research on spinal stenosis, and he was awarded the Syme professorship for work on congenital talipes (formerly called ‘club foot’). Retired for the last five years, he still continues with research and writing.
[Update: we were sorry to learn that Professor Porter died on 20 July 2005, aged 70. His obituary in the British Medical Journal noted both his extensive contributions to spinal research, including scoliosis, osteoporosis and club feet, his medical inventions, TV documentaries about him, and sponsoring overseas doctors.
Ah yes, the tired chatlatan's tactic.Take spinal surgery, there is absolutely nothing taught in an evolution class that enables a surgeon to perform better.
Your quick adoption of ad-hominem in this discussion shows that your argument is weak.Ah yes, the tired chatlatan's tactic.
Would you like more examples of respected, competent medical professionals like him?Take one medical procedure in a vacuum and ask what evolution has to do with it.
Calling a view "absurd" the person stating that view a "charlatan" is not ignoring, it's evasion, attack the person not their argument.As if children graduate High school and enter spine surgery school for a couple years and then start performing spine surgery.
It's absurd and can be ignored as a bad faith distraction.
As I will now do.
he cant answer simple questions put to him what do you expect from the troll?Your quick adoption of ad-hominem in this discussion shows that your argument is weak.
Would you like more examples of respected, competent medical professionals like him?
Calling a view "absurd" the person stating that view a "charlatan" is not ignoring, it's evasion, attack the person not their argument.
That isn't ad hominem.Your quick adoption of ad-hominem in this discussion shows that your argument is weak.
I'm struggling to recall a single evolution devotee that I've ever debated online, who did not resort to ad-hominem, attack the person rather than their argument. I've debated this subject for some thirty+ years on many different boards and every single time the evolutionists eventually start insulting.he cant answer simple questions put to him what do you expect from the troll?
And here we get treated to Act III. It always comes, after the fight is lost.I'm struggling to recall a single evolution devotee that I've ever debated online, who did not resort to ad-hominem, attack the person rather than their argument.