Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a valid legalNot one banker sued Trump. New York did'nt loan the money.
What makes you think this dollar amount is excessive and a violation of 8A?Since there are no victims in the Trump case any political opposition can be the subject of this kind of legal action
Unconstitutional abridgment of 8th Amendment
Legally yes.She basically handed the appeals court their own decision
It's excessive.....blow out to the max most likely in every count.Not a valid legal
What makes you think this dollar amount is excessive and a violation of 8A?
On what basis are you making this assumption?
What documents and financial info do you have that the prosecuting DA and judge have not seen?
That's the next step which is all but inevitable.
Are you incapable of understanding that "but EVERYBODY does it" is not a valid legal argument OR legitimate defense against fraud charges.They ALL do business the exact same way, are you retarded, incapable of understanding the point?
Typical of arrogant narcissists.She basically handed the appeals court their own decision
It is a valid point. If there isn't a victim of fraud, how can Trump be guilty of fraud?Not a valid legal
What makes you think this dollar amount is excessive and a violation of 8A?
On what basis are you making this assumption?
What documents and financial info do you have that the prosecuting DA and judge have not seen?
I'm sure the entire banking network throughout New York State is working overtime right now.And you better believe that they will have every 'i' dotted and every 't' crossed to have fulfilled their due diligence according to SEC rules and their own internal policies and regulations. Which if subpoenaed in Trump's appeal, could also go a long way towards exposing the lie of the original trial.
Speeding is against the law because of safety reasons. Duh!Are you incapable of understanding that "but EVERYBODY does it" is not a valid legal argument OR legitimate defense against fraud charges.
It doesn't even work with speeding tickets.
Are you incapable of understanding that "but EVERYBODY does it" is not a valid legal argument OR legitimate defense against fraud charges.
It doesn't even work with speeding tickets.
You have one AG who ran on 'getting Trump' and one fruitcake biased judge, who also hates Trump, both democrats, and I'd bet both are going to get a big payoff (which will never be looked into or exposed) for their parts in this, who basically made this entire thing happen. There was NO FRAUD.
Because there is no victim and no amount of money needed to make a defrauded party whole, this is a punishment only.Not a valid legal
What makes you think this dollar amount is excessive and a violation of 8A?
On what basis are you making this assumption?
What documents and financial info do you have that the prosecuting DA and judge have not seen?
Not a valid legal
That there was no damage. To anyone. The fine was unmoored from any reality.What makes you think this dollar amount is excessive and a violation of 8A?
On what basis are you making this assumption?
I say this because your comment clearly does not reflect the decision.Yes, you chant that every time someone disagrees with your opinion. It gets boring. We've read the judge's opinion. We understand he completely ignored the practice in this industry to get Trump.
Read the statute.Typical of arrogant narcissists.
It is a valid point. If there isn't a victim of fraud, how can Trump be guilty of fraud?
The fine is designed to cripple Trump's campaign ability..... It won't work..... But it sure is one hell of a try.?? Are you saying you don't think banks can sue for fraud?
That there was no damage. To anyone. The fine was unmoored from any reality.
A valid punishment under NY lawBecause there is no victim and no amount of money needed to make a defrauded party whole, this is a punishment only.
The Deutsche bank people said they expected Trump to submit accurate information and took his numbers at face value.And you better believe that they will have every 'i' dotted and every 't' crossed to have fulfilled their due diligence according to SEC rules and their own internal policies and regulations. Which if subpoenaed in Trump's appeal, could also go a long way towards exposing the lie of the original trial.
They have no connection with God (Jesus) so they worship the things of this world, which Jesus told us not to do, told us that the things of this world are passing away. But this is what people do when they have no God to hold themselves accountable to... they just live for the moment, grab whatever goodies are dangled in front of them.Everyone outside of a small cult of Marxists and radicals understands that, once again, the extreme left who have decimated cities and want to work at the National level, are greatly harming the U.S.
Musk did a great service by saving Twitter. These people want more, they want your courts, your schools, your workplace and your Constitution.
What will the rest of the world look like if you become like so many of our failed systems?
They signed on the dotted line....end of story.The Deutsche bank people said they expected Trump to submit accurate information and took his numbers at face value.
This was under oath in court.
But I guess you already knew that, right?
You have simply moved your goalpost of false hope to the appeals court niw.And you better believe that they will have every 'i' dotted and every 't' crossed to have fulfilled their due diligence according to SEC rules and their own internal policies and regulations. Which if subpoenaed in Trump's appeal, could also go a long way towards exposing the lie of the original trial.
They didn’t. This was a financial statement for the entire organization, it would be irrational to send appraisers to every single piece of property.They signed on the dotted line....end of story.
They didn't send out appraisers? Bullshit.
