MSNBC slammed as ‘freak show’ after host Chris Hayes melts down defending gender surgery for children

What a lie. Hayes didn't defend the right to operate on children. You didn't watch it, did you?
Not interested in what a flunkie leftist mouthpiece has to read from a teleprompter.

The Sloppy Joe politburo mouthpiece, on the other hand, is in a position to do far greater harm.

 
This is complete bullshit. There were no such books in any Florida schools. Kindly provide evidence that anything you posted is true.

These are the books being banned:


I think what the angry, self-loathing left needs to understand is that the world doesn’t revolve around your need to groom children.

While it will crush your tender sensibilities, keep your porn, tranny story time and retrograde ideologies away from children.



 
Not interested in what a flunkie leftist mouthpiece has to read from a teleprompter.

The Sloppy Joe politburo mouthpiece, on the other hand, is in a position to do far greater harm.

Education Secretary Miguel Cardona was roasted Friday after he claimed that teachers, rather than parents, know what is best for children.

NOT even close to what he said.

"Teachers know what is best for their kids because they are with them every day. We must trust teachers," Cardona wrote on Twitter.

IN their class.

Do parents know better how to treat their child with a broken arm, than a hospital?
 
You’re the one whose every waking moment is consumed by thoughts of Trump…. SWEETIE <——- note my use of caps for added melodrama.
As the Trump cult are consumed with Biden and his sons laptop?
STILL waiting for the "BOMBSHELL" witness who is going to bury Biden.
 
Education Secretary Miguel Cardona was roasted Friday after he claimed that teachers, rather than parents, know what is best for children.

NOT even close to what he said.

"Teachers know what is best for their kids because they are with them every day. We must trust teachers," Cardona wrote on Twitter.

IN their class.

Do parents know better how to treat their child with a broken arm, than a hospital?

“their kids”? You may want some over the top queer teacher grooming your child but you seem not to understand that parents have rights.

Parents have rights. What an audacious thought.

Do queer teachers know better how to raise and groom a child than you do?… oh, wait. Bad example. They do.
 
“their kids”? You may want some over the top queer teacher grooming your child but you seem not to understand that parents have rights.
They are "THEIR" kids when they're in the teacher's CLASSROOM.
Parents have rights. What an audacious thought.
They always have.
Do queer teachers know better how to raise and groom a child than you do?… oh, wait. Bad example. They do.
You must be a religious nut.
Never look directly at their eyes, they will turn you gay.
 
They are "THEIR" kids when they're in the teacher's CLASSROOM.

They always have.

You must be a religious nut.
Never look directly at their eyes, they will turn you gay.

They are in those classrooms because the government will arrest the parent if they are not.

They are “the children” not “their children”.
 
They are "THEIR" kids when they're in the teacher's CLASSROOM.

They always have.

You must be a religious nut.
Never look directly at their eyes, they will turn you gay.
No. Apparently you are fine with teachers grooming young children. Apparently you want testosterone-free boys.

The leftist religion of grooming is really twisted.

You looked directly in their eyes. All is lost for you.
 
No. Apparently you are fine with teachers grooming young children. Apparently you want testosterone-free boys.

The leftist religion of grooming is really twisted.

You looked directly in their eyes. All is lost for you.
See above NUT JOB.
 
They are in those classrooms because the government will arrest the parent if they are not.
Parents have alternatives, after all if all teachers are "groomers", I would definitely send my kid to one of them fine religious schools.
They are “the children” not “their children”.
So, you ignore the part that stated........IN THE TEACHERS CLASSROOM?
They are THEIR teachers students.........THEIR children, in that context.
NOT THEIRS forever.
 
Parents have alternatives, after all if all teachers are "groomers", I would definitely send my kid to one of them fine religious schools.

So, you ignore the part that stated........IN THE TEACHERS CLASSROOM?
They are THEIR teachers students.........THEIR children, in that context.
NOT THEIRS forever.

Do the parents get the money that they paid through taxes back SO THEY CAN AFFORD TO AND NOT BE JAILED?

Answer: NO

The teachers are given no ownership of the children. They are not “their children”. At best, they are “the children in my classroom”.

With the way the left redefines words, we need care when we use them.
 
Do the parents get the money that they paid through taxes back SO THEY CAN AFFORD TO AND NOT BE JAILED?

Answer: NO
WTF?
I don't get the taxes back I paid for schools and my kids have been out of school for more than a decade.
The teachers are given no ownership of the children.
Never stated that,
I guess you can't comprehend or just ignore words.
They are not “their children”. At best, they are “the children in my classroom”.
So...................so, for a doctor or nurse it's " THE patient in room 114, not MY patient in room 114"?
With the way the left redefines words, we need care when we use them.
It isn't literal you dumbass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top