Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been on this forum only a few days and he has yet to present an intelligent argument.Wow, that's quite a brilliant, compelling argument! It's quid pro quo...because, mah dictionary told me it is. Son, I think you get a "D" on this project.Haha...no it isn't. Dude, you need to step outside the wingnut blogosphere for some fresh air. This is absurd.Fact: Legally that's called quid pro quo
They don't have dictionaries in Indiana? You know you're on the Internet and obviously have a browser. Try this:
www.google.com and type in "definition quid pro quo"
Sorry dude, but I think maybe you should fire your team of legal experts.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Please excuse KAZ, his opinions are all built on radio waves, the source of his epistemological notions. They should not be taken seriously and as the man might have said, Don't trust, they cannot be verified.
You know boss, you are really having a hard time here aren't you? "As PolitiFact has laid out in great detail, there is no direct evidence of a quid pro quo among Clinton, the State Department, Rosatom and the Clinton Foundation donors with ties to Uranium One. Clinton has repeatedly denied any involvement in the State Department’s approval of the Uranium One sale, insisting that such approval was granted at lower levels of the department and would not have crossed the secretary’s desk." What is it about proof, evidence, and the truth in reporting that you cannot decipher? It isn't that hard. Your denial and willful stupidity are on display for all to see.Lol! I never said anything about ignoring youNothing! She must have given it all to you, seeing that your non-existent argument about her getting it doesn't exist.
That's great. How much did she really get?
Nothing!
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Snopes says you're a lying asshole.
Read your link....FALSE!
You and Kaz are liars.
You said you were ignoring me, you're the liar. This is your second post where you addressed me through someone else as if anyone is falling for that
Read the quote, that reply was to Jimbo, not you, moron. He said he's going to ignore me then kept replying to me through other people's posts
I'm still waiting for that link that proves me wrong about Uranium one. You know, the $145 million that Clinton supposedly had gotten? You know, the 20% uranium approved by Clinton's state department that never happened. You know the part where Clinton voted for the deal but didn't. You're all mouth and no show boss.
Actually, I repeatedly said that if you don't answer my question about which facts I listed you are disputing, then I won't answer your questions. You don't get to ask questions if you don't answer them.
Fact: The Russians received 20% of US uranium reserves
Fact: Hillary signed off on the deal
Fact: Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal
Fact: Legally that's called quid pro quo
If you don't answer the question clearly I asked you first, I am not going to answer yours no matter how much you bitch and moan and whine that you don't need to answer my questions but I do have to answer yours. You implied several answers in your last post, but I want a clear answer. Which of those facts are you denying?
That's nice, crybaby. But the fact remains that Hillary did not receive that money. When you say she did, you are lying. And the funniest part is that your entire pile of bullshit rests on this one lie by you.No she didn't. Ridiculous,shameless lie.Hillary got $145 million.
See, this is why you always fail. You believe dumb shit.
Again the brainiac who doesn't know what the Clinton Foundation has to do with Hillary.
The stupid is strong in this one, Luke Skywalker ...
A more intelligent person might pause to wonder if, oh just maybe, that is why the world is not agreeing with him. A more stupid person would just insist the false things are true, and that everyone is engaged in a vast conspiracy.
Wow, that's quite a brilliant, compelling argument! It's quid pro quo...because, mah dictionary told me it is. Son, I think you get a "D" on this project.Haha...no it isn't. Dude, you need to step outside the wingnut blogosphere for some fresh air. This is absurd.Fact: Legally that's called quid pro quo
They don't have dictionaries in Indiana? You know you're on the Internet and obviously have a browser. Try this:
www.google.com and type in "definition quid pro quo"
Sorry dude, but I think maybe you should fire your team of legal experts.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Please excuse KAZ, his opinions are all built on radio waves, the source of his epistemological notions. They should not be taken seriously and as the man might have said, Don't trust, they cannot be verified.
The "Foundation belonging to Hillary" has absolutely nothing to do with the truth I put in your lap.That's nice, crybaby. But the fact remains that Hillary did not receive that money. When you say she did, you are lying. And the funniest part is that your entire pile of bullshit rests on this one lie by you.No she didn't. Ridiculous,shameless lie.Hillary got $145 million.
See, this is why you always fail. You believe dumb shit.
Again the brainiac who doesn't know what the Clinton Foundation has to do with Hillary.
The stupid is strong in this one, Luke Skywalker ...
A more intelligent person might pause to wonder if, oh just maybe, that is why the world is not agreeing with him. A more stupid person would just insist the false things are true, and that everyone is engaged in a vast conspiracy.
Wow, you're really into my feelings. Frankly it's pretty creepy. You have a thing for me, huh? Just FYI, I'm not gay, and even if I were, eew
The foundation belongs to Hillary. You're truly a Democrat sheep. They tell you what to think and like a good little boy, you think it ...
Lol! All you have left is to change the narrative to another conversation while you cowardly avoid proving me wrong, via the links I already posted, which destroyed all your arguments. You have no argument that you can back up, so you go and hide behind a narrative that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. No one is talking about "what the Clinton Foundation has to do with the Clinton's. We are talking about proving whether they received the money for their personal benefit. You are claiming they did. You lied, and I proved you were lying.The foundation and Clinton are not one and the same. And you were talking about "stupid douches". Lol! Why you keep stepping in your own pile is beyond me?Snopes says you are, or you have no understanding of reading comprehension. Tell you what you need to do; copy and paste from Snopes where it says Clinton received herself, $145 million dollars. Then we will find out who the "lying asshole" is. Sound fair?
copy and paste from Snopes where it says Clinton received herself, $145 million dollars.
You think Hillary has no control over those bribes...err...contributions?
What are you, 12 years old? DERP!
He finally clarified his lie by claiming the money went to her foundation, not to her. What a stupid douche WTP is
However, I will have to say, it takes a douche not to be able to figure that out.
So you don't know what the CLINTON foundation has to do with the Clintons??? OMG, you're so stupid it's hilarious
I've been on this forum only a few days and he has yet to present an intelligent argument.Wow, that's quite a brilliant, compelling argument! It's quid pro quo...because, mah dictionary told me it is. Son, I think you get a "D" on this project.Haha...no it isn't. Dude, you need to step outside the wingnut blogosphere for some fresh air. This is absurd.
They don't have dictionaries in Indiana? You know you're on the Internet and obviously have a browser. Try this:
www.google.com and type in "definition quid pro quo"
Sorry dude, but I think maybe you should fire your team of legal experts.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Please excuse KAZ, his opinions are all built on radio waves, the source of his epistemological notions. They should not be taken seriously and as the man might have said, Don't trust, they cannot be verified.
You know boss, you are really having a hard time here aren't you? "As PolitiFact has laid out in great detail, there is no direct evidence of a quid pro quo among Clinton, the State Department, Rosatom and the Clinton Foundation donors with ties to Uranium One. Clinton has repeatedly denied any involvement in the State Department’s approval of the Uranium One sale, insisting that such approval was granted at lower levels of the department and would not have crossed the secretary’s desk." What is it about proof, evidence, and the truth in reporting that you cannot decipher? It isn't that hard. Your denial and willful stupidity are on display for all to see.Lol! I never said anything about ignoring youThat's great. How much did she really get?
Nothing!
Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s Canadian founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Snopes says you're a lying asshole.
Read your link....FALSE!
You and Kaz are liars.
You said you were ignoring me, you're the liar. This is your second post where you addressed me through someone else as if anyone is falling for that
Read the quote, that reply was to Jimbo, not you, moron. He said he's going to ignore me then kept replying to me through other people's posts
I'm still waiting for that link that proves me wrong about Uranium one. You know, the $145 million that Clinton supposedly had gotten? You know, the 20% uranium approved by Clinton's state department that never happened. You know the part where Clinton voted for the deal but didn't. You're all mouth and no show boss.
Actually, I repeatedly said that if you don't answer my question about which facts I listed you are disputing, then I won't answer your questions. You don't get to ask questions if you don't answer them.
Fact: The Russians received 20% of US uranium reserves
Fact: Hillary signed off on the deal
Fact: Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal
Fact: Legally that's called quid pro quo
If you don't answer the question clearly I asked you first, I am not going to answer yours no matter how much you bitch and moan and whine that you don't need to answer my questions but I do have to answer yours. You implied several answers in your last post, but I want a clear answer. Which of those facts are you denying?
The "Foundation belonging to Hillary" has absolutely nothing to do with the truth I put in your lap.That's nice, crybaby. But the fact remains that Hillary did not receive that money. When you say she did, you are lying. And the funniest part is that your entire pile of bullshit rests on this one lie by you.No she didn't. Ridiculous,shameless lie.Hillary got $145 million.
See, this is why you always fail. You believe dumb shit.
Again the brainiac who doesn't know what the Clinton Foundation has to do with Hillary.
The stupid is strong in this one, Luke Skywalker ...
A more intelligent person might pause to wonder if, oh just maybe, that is why the world is not agreeing with him. A more stupid person would just insist the false things are true, and that everyone is engaged in a vast conspiracy.
Wow, you're really into my feelings. Frankly it's pretty creepy. You have a thing for me, huh? Just FYI, I'm not gay, and even if I were, eew
The foundation belongs to Hillary. You're truly a Democrat sheep. They tell you what to think and like a good little boy, you think it ...
And by the way, you can save the homophobic rhetoric. Just another distraction while you cowardly walk away from the facts I put in your face. Boss, you have nothing intelligent to debate. Go outside and pick up sticks. You are a constant reminder of the embarrassment of your party.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Are you seriously THAT far behind?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat these idiocies - It won't make them the slightest bit true.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Are you seriously THAT far behind?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat these idiocies - It won't make them the slightest bit true.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Are you seriously THAT far behind?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat these idiocies - It won't make them the slightest bit true.
We keep presenting him with multiple links proving Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium one.
It is obvious this person lacks critical thinking skills.
If only you had a link proving your point. Too bad for you you don't, right? Can you imagine, you wouldn't look like the idiot that you proved to us all that you are, if you had proof. You see for these Trump Sheep that is the main underlying problem. They use conjecture, hyperbolic hate, and splattered spaghetti up against the wall to do their bidding for them. The word used for people like that are called "idiots".Lol! All you have left is to change the narrative to another conversation while you cowardly avoid proving me wrong, via the links I already posted, which destroyed all your arguments. You have no argument that you can back up, so you go and hide behind a narrative that has nothing to do with what we are talking about. No one is talking about "what the Clinton Foundation has to do with the Clinton's. We are talking about proving whether they received the money for their personal benefit. You are claiming they did. You lied, and I proved you were lying.The foundation and Clinton are not one and the same. And you were talking about "stupid douches". Lol! Why you keep stepping in your own pile is beyond me?copy and paste from Snopes where it says Clinton received herself, $145 million dollars.
You think Hillary has no control over those bribes...err...contributions?
What are you, 12 years old? DERP!
He finally clarified his lie by claiming the money went to her foundation, not to her. What a stupid douche WTP is
However, I will have to say, it takes a douche not to be able to figure that out.
So you don't know what the CLINTON foundation has to do with the Clintons??? OMG, you're so stupid it's hilarious
You just said the money went to the Clinton foundation, not Hillary. That was amazingly your defense of her. So I addressed that. You don't pay attention to what you argued?
Not to mention $500K went straight from Russia to her bank account and the law doesn't recognize your view that her trading uranium for money and the money going to her foundation, not her personal account isn't quid pro quo. Legally, it is. It also is to anyone who's not a complete and utter idiot like you are
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Are you seriously THAT far behind?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat these idiocies - It won't make them the slightest bit true.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Are you seriously THAT far behind?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
This simple chart debunks the conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton sold uranium to Russia
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat these idiocies - It won't make them the slightest bit true.
We keep presenting him with multiple links proving Clinton had nothing to do with Uranium one.
It is obvious this person lacks critical thinking skills.
Another leftist joins the circle jerk.
Your argument as you clarified is that giving money to Hillary's foundation isn't giving her money. Oh, and you have to ignore the $500K that went straight into her bank account
Another leftist joins the circle jerk.
Your argument as you clarified is that giving money to Hillary's foundation isn't giving her money. Oh, and you have to ignore the $500K that went straight into her bank account