Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Aug 3, 2009
- 51,322
- 6,470
Wow, that's quite a brilliant, compelling argument! It's quid pro quo...because, mah dictionary told me it is. Son, I think you get a "D" on this project.They don't have dictionaries in Indiana? You know you're on the Internet and obviously have a browser. Try this:
www.google.com and type in "definition quid pro quo"
Sorry dude, but I think maybe you should fire your team of legal experts.
Hillary got $145 million.
The Russians got 20% of US uranium.
Hillary was the most senior administration official to sign off on the deal.
You read the definition of quid pro quo and don't see how that applies? Seriously?
Please excuse KAZ, his opinions are all built on radio waves, the source of his epistemological notions. They should not be taken seriously and as the man might have said, Don't trust, they cannot be verified.
Kaz hears voices in his head....they are called FIX News. They Fix onto a lie and never let it go. Hannity is the King Liar there.
You don't grasp the idea of ignoring me, do you?
Obviously you think it means you continue to address me without responding to my points, but that isn't any different than your not ignoring me ...
Your points? Nothing you have posted reflects thinking on your part, you are a parrot who echoes BIG LIES as if they are original to you.