Mueller Shows His True Colors

He’ll show up to testify if asked. Unlike Trump’s co-conspirators.

Hey shit-for-brains....he said he wouldn't be testifying....didn't hear his little confession did ya?
He said he did not want to. I will make any bet with you that he will if asked; unlike Trump’s fellow criminals.
Be careful what you wish for. If Mueller testifies, the Republicans have a long list of questions they want to ask him, like when did he learn there was no collusion, and why didn't he investigate the FISA warrant.
The Senate is free to call him up. They won’t, though. They know their house of cards is built on crimes and treason. Be careful what YOU wish for, traitor.
We know that everything you post is total horseshit.
 
William Barr with his bias and his favorability toward Trump has acted more like a defense lawyer than the U.S. Attorney General. Today Robert Mueller wanted to set the record straight.

Provided below are direct quotes from Mueller's statement. They will be in bold italics so nobody can say they missed them or were confused, although some will say that anyway or avoid the comments altogether.

The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. We are formally closing the special counsel’s office, and as well, I’m resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life.

Barr and Trump refuse to allow Congress to see the full, unredacted version of the report. Congress can see only what Barr will allow them to see. That is a clear sign of guilt.

Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.

That candidate was Hillary Clinton. The Russians wanted Trump to become our next President.

When a subject of an investigation obstructs that investigation or lies to investigators, it strikes at the core of the government’s effort to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable.

This volume [First] includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.


Contrary, to Trump's pronouncements of innocence, that does not mean he is innocent. It means there was not sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to convict Trump in a court of law. That was not possible anyway. Mueller than makes guilt or innocence clear.

If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.

Clearly, that is the most important statement in the entire presentation. Trump, Sanders, and Jay Sekulow completely ignored that statement in their statements today.

The introduction to the volume two of our report explains that decision. It explains that under long-standing department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office.

The special counsel’s office is part of the Department of Justice and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.


Clearly, that is the second most important statement in Mueller's presentation. Barr falsely claimed that OLC rule of not charging a sitting President did not, I repeat, did not, play a role in Mueller's Report.

Obviously, it did. The OLC's ruling played a huge role in the report.

Barr lied.

The opinion says that the Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.

Barr said Mueller was equivocal about Congress's role. Obviously, Mueller left it up to Congress in terms of the next step.

Barr lied.

It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there can be no court resolution of the actual charge.

So that was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. And from them, we concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.


Always the true professional.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...we-would-have-said-so/?utm_term=.088fe16feead
iu
 
Mueller ran and hid like a scalded dog!!

He now knows he will be charged with high treason


Mueller the coward would not take any questions because that would prove he is guilty of high treason

Barr must take his passport quickly while he investigates the unequal and hypocritical justice from
Mueller
 
Mueller pulled a Comey trying to keep the lie alive... Muller is scared shitless that he could be sucked into the attempted Coup de' Taut.
It seemed to me that Mueller was pushing for congressional impeachment. He really is a piece of work. That Mueller, McCabe, Yates, Ohr, Comey, Crapper and Brennan managed to hold the very top law enforcement, investigative and intelligence positions in the United States is extremely discomforting.

It’s Time for a Thoroughgoing Revamping of the Intelligence Community.

Among the urgent tasks we must quickly undertake, few are so urgent as a thoroughgoing revamping of the intelligence community. At the moment, it isn’t very impressive in either of the two main activities with which it’s entrusted: spying on our enemies and supporting our friends. You can see this easily enough. The Israelis, not the CIA et al., made off with the Iranians’ secret nuclear plans. So much for effective espionage. And there are two very closely linked enemies, Iran and Venezuela, that should be prime targets for subversion, but we don’t seem to be making good progress.

On the other hand, the intelligence community seems to do well, or at least try harder, at subverting our own political order, as we’ve learned over the recent past.

Or maybe not. Although the attempted subversion of Trump and associates produced the downfall of Lt. General Michael Flynn, the centerpiece of the intel operation—the Mueller show investigation—came up empty-handed, and the top levels of the FBI and CIA now face inquiries from Attorney General Barr, Justice Department Inspector General Horowitz, and the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut. Some of our top spooks have been fired.

Rather like Iran and Venezuela, isn’t it?

It’s an opportunity. For decades, Congress and various special committees and duos (such as Robb-Silverman) have invariably responded to intelligence failures by adding more bodies to the agencies and expanding their budgets. The predictable result? Today we’ve got too many spooks collecting too much money, with predictably bad results. Among other bad consequences, intelligence is typically churned out by committees, guaranteeing that we don’t identify our best analysts. We need to drastically reduce the numbers of both budgets and bureaucrats, in order to figure out who’s good. Then we need to promote them, within a much smaller system.

It’s hard to imagine this happening under normal circumstances, but today’s circumstances aren’t normal.
Time to clean house, and take out the trash.
 
Mueller pulled a Comey trying to keep the lie alive... Muller is scared shitless that he could be sucked into the attempted Coup de' Taut.
It seemed to me that Mueller was pushing for congressional impeachment. He really is a piece of work. That Mueller, McCabe, Yates, Ohr, Comey, Crapper and Brennan managed to hold the very top law enforcement, investigative and intelligence positions in the United States is extremely discomforting.

It’s Time for a Thoroughgoing Revamping of the Intelligence Community.

Among the urgent tasks we must quickly undertake, few are so urgent as a thoroughgoing revamping of the intelligence community. At the moment, it isn’t very impressive in either of the two main activities with which it’s entrusted: spying on our enemies and supporting our friends. You can see this easily enough. The Israelis, not the CIA et al., made off with the Iranians’ secret nuclear plans. So much for effective espionage. And there are two very closely linked enemies, Iran and Venezuela, that should be prime targets for subversion, but we don’t seem to be making good progress.

On the other hand, the intelligence community seems to do well, or at least try harder, at subverting our own political order, as we’ve learned over the recent past.

Or maybe not. Although the attempted subversion of Trump and associates produced the downfall of Lt. General Michael Flynn, the centerpiece of the intel operation—the Mueller show investigation—came up empty-handed, and the top levels of the FBI and CIA now face inquiries from Attorney General Barr, Justice Department Inspector General Horowitz, and the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut. Some of our top spooks have been fired.

Rather like Iran and Venezuela, isn’t it?

It’s an opportunity. For decades, Congress and various special committees and duos (such as Robb-Silverman) have invariably responded to intelligence failures by adding more bodies to the agencies and expanding their budgets. The predictable result? Today we’ve got too many spooks collecting too much money, with predictably bad results. Among other bad consequences, intelligence is typically churned out by committees, guaranteeing that we don’t identify our best analysts. We need to drastically reduce the numbers of both budgets and bureaucrats, in order to figure out who’s good. Then we need to promote them, within a much smaller system.

It’s hard to imagine this happening under normal circumstances, but today’s circumstances aren’t normal.
Time to clean house, and take out the trash.
Just as it was not Comeys position to say anything on Clinton, the same was for Mueller on Trump. Mueller had the ability to say there was sufficient evidence to charge and then withhold those charges until Trump left office. Mueller even had the opportunity to say he had "probable cause" to believe but failed to do that in writing of his report. Mueller could also have indicted under seal and waited until after Trump left office.

The OLC RECOMMENDATION is not law, it is simply a recommendation that a sitting president should not be indicted. Again Muller had no legitimate reason for doing what he did today and actually removed any thought that he was not biased against Trump proving he was not impartial.

The Senate needs to make him appear under oath, by subpoena if necessary. He needs to tell us when he was informed the collusion charge was disproved. According to British Intelligence a note was sent to the FBI and the state department on January 12, 2017 that showed the collusion lie was made up. If this is true, the Mueller probe was DOA prior to the special counsel being seated.

I understand why Mueller doesn't want to answer questions, he's a liar and he has been caught in a lie, that killed the investigation before it even started. Having this evidence, what did he do for the remainder of the investigation? What legal premise authorized that time spent on it? Even further questions would be, who in the OBAMA administration had it and suppressed it. Flynn had it as well as it was sent to the president elect staff as well. Flynn was booted and unable to produce the note by the Mueller charges. Was this by design? Were they intentionally obstructing the production of excopitory evidence?
 
Last edited:
He’ll show up to testify if asked. Unlike Trump’s co-conspirators.

Hey shit-for-brains....he said he wouldn't be testifying....didn't hear his little confession did ya?
He said he did not want to. I will make any bet with you that he will if asked; unlike Trump’s fellow criminals.
Be careful what you wish for. If Mueller testifies, the Republicans have a long list of questions they want to ask him, like when did he learn there was no collusion, and why didn't he investigate the FISA warrant.

Oh Dear....Oh My....more empty RePuBliKlan Threats.

10-Separate Incidents of Obstruction by 45. Keep dancing on the head of pin, pretty soon you will run out of room.
There was no collusion, shit for brains.


Mr. Mueller was very clear in his announcement yesterday.

1. Russia Interfered in the 2016 Presidential Election.

2.
 
He’ll show up to testify if asked. Unlike Trump’s co-conspirators.

Hey shit-for-brains....he said he wouldn't be testifying....didn't hear his little confession did ya?
He said he did not want to. I will make any bet with you that he will if asked; unlike Trump’s fellow criminals.
Be careful what you wish for. If Mueller testifies, the Republicans have a long list of questions they want to ask him, like when did he learn there was no collusion, and why didn't he investigate the FISA warrant.

Oh Dear....Oh My....more empty RePuBliKlan Threats.

10-Separate Incidents of Obstruction by 45. Keep dancing on the head of pin, pretty soon you will run out of room.
There was no collusion, shit for brains.


Mr. Mueller was very clear in his announcement yesterday.

1. Russia Interfered in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

2. Under DOJ Guide Lines he could not indict 45. Absent those Guide Lines, 45 would have been indicted on 10-Counts of Obstruction.

3. The were 10-Separate and distinct acts of Obstruction Committed by 45.

4. Barr misrepresented the Mueller Report by cheery picking facts and distorting facts.

5. 45 WAS NOT EXONERATED.

6. Mueller did not say that the Lying Shit Faced Fucker 45 was innocent.

Cons are lying their asses off and they know it.
 
Hey shit-for-brains....he said he wouldn't be testifying....didn't hear his little confession did ya?
He said he did not want to. I will make any bet with you that he will if asked; unlike Trump’s fellow criminals.
Be careful what you wish for. If Mueller testifies, the Republicans have a long list of questions they want to ask him, like when did he learn there was no collusion, and why didn't he investigate the FISA warrant.

Oh Dear....Oh My....more empty RePuBliKlan Threats.

10-Separate Incidents of Obstruction by 45. Keep dancing on the head of pin, pretty soon you will run out of room.
There was no collusion, shit for brains.


Mr. Mueller was very clear in his announcement yesterday.

1. Russia Interfered in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

2. Under DOJ Guide Lines he could not indict 45. Absent those Guide Lines, 45 would have been indicted on 10-Counts of Obstruction.

3. The were 10-Separate and distinct acts of Obstruction Committed by 45.

4. Barr misrepresented the Mueller Report by cheery picking facts and distorting facts.

5. 45 WAS NOT EXONERATED.

6. Mueller did not say that the Lying Shit Faced Fucker 45 was innocent.

Cons are lying their asses off and they know it.

  1. So what? That wasn't the purpose of the witch hunt.
  2. He wasn't required to indict anyone. Nothing stopped him from rending a decision on whether Trump committed a crime just as Ken Starr rendered such a decision during the White Water investigation. He declined to do so.
  3. Wrong.
  4. Wrong.
  5. You've been told 10,000 times that exonerating suspects is not what prosecutors do.
  6. A repeat of #5
 
-"With Mueller complicit in Uranium 1 , every move he makes is calculated to save himself from that chapter .This was probably one of the most treasonous acts ever perpetrated against the Republic, so he has no choice but to play along."-


A total snake.

Please explain your charge of treason with regards to the Uranium One purchase of some US mines that were owned by a Canadian company.
 
He said he did not want to. I will make any bet with you that he will if asked; unlike Trump’s fellow criminals.
Be careful what you wish for. If Mueller testifies, the Republicans have a long list of questions they want to ask him, like when did he learn there was no collusion, and why didn't he investigate the FISA warrant.

Oh Dear....Oh My....more empty RePuBliKlan Threats.

10-Separate Incidents of Obstruction by 45. Keep dancing on the head of pin, pretty soon you will run out of room.
There was no collusion, shit for brains.


Mr. Mueller was very clear in his announcement yesterday.

1. Russia Interfered in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

2. Under DOJ Guide Lines he could not indict 45. Absent those Guide Lines, 45 would have been indicted on 10-Counts of Obstruction.

3. The were 10-Separate and distinct acts of Obstruction Committed by 45.

4. Barr misrepresented the Mueller Report by cheery picking facts and distorting facts.

5. 45 WAS NOT EXONERATED.

6. Mueller did not say that the Lying Shit Faced Fucker 45 was innocent.

Cons are lying their asses off and they know it.

  1. So what? That wasn't the purpose of the witch hunt.
  2. He wasn't required to indict anyone. Nothing stopped him from rending a decision on whether Trump committed a crime just as Ken Starr rendered such a decision during the White Water investigation. He declined to do so.
  3. Wrong.
  4. Wrong.
  5. You've been told 10,000 times that exonerating suspects is not what prosecutors do.
  6. A repeat of #5
Dirty Bob wants to declare Trump, not, not guilty. I love the way these crooked bastards think they can just make things up. How in the world did Mueller and Comey EVER head the FBI?
 
Yes, the expect Seig Heil GroppenFuhrer Followers continue Goose Step their way through the lies being told.

No Exoneration....did not happen.

10-Separate and distinct cases of Presidential Obstruction

New York passed a law giving Congress access to the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Orange Faced Cowards New York State Taxes and Finances. New York also sealed indictments waiting for that lying Piece of Shit leaves offce.
 
Last edited:
and still no Russian connection

Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military launched a concerted attack on our political system. The releases were designed and timed to interfere with our election and to damage a presidential candidate.

That candidate was Hillary Clinton. The Russians wanted Trump to become our next President.
 
Yes, the expect Seig Heil GroppenFuhrer Followers continue Goose Step their way through the lies being told.

No Exoneration....did not happen.

10-Separate and distinct cases of Presidential Obstruction

New York passed a law giving Congress access to the 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Orange Faced Cowards New York State Taxes and Finances. New York also sealed indictments waiting for that lying Piece of Shit leaves offce.
What support do you have for your claim that NY has issued sealed indictments against Trump?
 
AG Barr Strikes Backs with a CBS Interview.

“Barr says Mueller could’ve made a decision on obstruction. Mueller did made a decision on the RUSSIA conspiracy issue, so why not on obstruction? What is the difference? Mueller’s prosecutors couldn’t meet the threshold of reasonable doubt. Can you imagine the freakout if Mueller came back and announced straight up he couldn’t bring any charges against the president at all? The left’s ritual defamation game would have been over. A report with “no charges” would defeat the purpose of the entire special counsel affair, which was to cripple and soil the Trump administration with the charge of ambiguous criminal activity lurking around it.”​
 

Forum List

Back
Top