Mueller's Team Speaking to Reporters

Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump


Some of Muller's investigators told associates? as reported by NY Times? the organization famous for denying the holocaust?
What are the leftists inside the NY Times organization looking for? They want the report to say Trump should be indicted? they want it to say there should be a new round of investigations?

It's time to investigate how The FISA warrants were obtained... every name involved. and that needs to be made very public now.
 
Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated,
Any specifics? Any suggestions as to how Barr should have summarized it?

.
The demos will strech out and try to catch smoke rings from eachothers ass that are critical of trump for years to come they are delusional
 
Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump


Some of Muller's investigators told associates? as reported by NY Times? the organization famous for denying the holocaust?
What are the leftists inside the NY Times organization looking for? They want the report to say Trump should be indicted? they want it to say there should be a new round of investigations?

It's time to investigate how The FISA warrants were obtained... every name involved. and that needs to be made very public now.
Denying the Holocaust?

What are you smoking?
 
Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump
Your link:

"Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but needs time to scrub out confidential information.

"The special counsel’s investigators had already written multiple summaries of the report
, and some team members believe that Mr. Barr should have included more of their material in the four-page letter he wrote on March 24 laying out their main conclusions, according to government officials familiar with the investigation. Mr. Barr only briefly cited the special counsel’s work in his letter."

If Mueller's team created an Executive Summary among those "multiple summaries of the report," it would already have been scrubbed of Grand Jury and sensitive national security information.
Barr-as-AG-Pic-300x221.jpg

Which means Bill Barr is doing exactly what he was hired to do just like he did 26 years ago for another corrupt Republican president.

Barr as AG? Bush and Trump Dovetail | Accuracy.Org
View attachment 253991

George deeply saddened.
George deeply saddened.
4737358-0-image-m-11_1538581572910.jpg

"Mr. Trump won the presidency proclaiming himself a self-made billionaire, and he has long insisted that his father, the legendary New York City builder Fred C. Trump, provided almost no financial help.

"But The Times’s investigation, based on a vast trove of confidential tax returns and financial records, reveals that Mr. Trump received the equivalent today of at least $413 million from his father’s real estate empire, starting when he was a toddler and continuing to this day."

Trump Engaged in Suspect Tax Schemes as He Reaped Riches From His Father
you should go talk to your dad.
 
Some in the Mueller team don't like Trump and are leaking to the press again. Say it ain't so. Don't worry boo boo bear, we'll stop him!!
 
Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump


No reputable news paper would publish such unverified hearsay and no rational adult would swallow such nonsense. Just proves how irrational you commies are.

.
 
Just two days ago you tards were saying

Well if Barr is lying someone from the Mueller team would speak out.

Well they did and things are not looking for for the Orange Fool
 
Just two days ago you tards were saying

Well if Barr is lying someone from the Mueller team would speak out.

Well they did and things are not looking for for the Orange Fool

You poor deluded fool. There were no comments from Mueller's team. Third hand hearsay from people who "talked to people" or who "know somebody who talked to somebody else who heard from this person". No surprise the leftis sheep are falling all over these anonymous (read: non-existent) "sources". Another epic fail.
 
Just two days ago you tards were saying

Well if Barr is lying someone from the Mueller team would speak out.

Well they did and things are not looking for for the Orange Fool
Nothing was rebutted and no mueller appointee Your point?
 
I am have been reading stories on this subject. Which members Mueller's team are speaking out? I can't seem to verify it.
 
Trumpers have said that Mueller team members would speak out if they thought that Barr wasn't being straight with the American people. Well now they are

WASHINGTON — Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

NYT: Some on Mueller’s team see their findings more damaging for Trump


Some of Muller's investigators told associates? as reported by NY Times? the organization famous for denying the holocaust?
What are the leftists inside the NY Times organization looking for? They want the report to say Trump should be indicted? they want it to say there should be a new round of investigations?

It's time to investigate how The FISA warrants were obtained... every name involved. and that needs to be made very public now.
Denying the Holocaust?

What are you smoking?


example: remember the Warsaw Ghetto uprising? the NY Times during WW2 wrote the news piece on it without mentioning that Jews were involved. They were guilty of a lot of blatant omission. Thats the same thing as denial when you are a powerful news outlet.
 
...Except the public can't see Trump's taxes unless he okays it. You do know that, right?
Quite true.

But we can utilize the Democratic Party -control collection of House committees as proxies.

And we're all confident they'll leak everything they get their hands on, the law be damned.
That is a separate matter.

First, comes compliance with existing law, in the matter of releasing all documentation to Congress.

If that means sending-in the US Marshals (into IRS facilities, or Drumpf properties) then so be it.
 
...Except the public can't see Trump's taxes unless he okays it. You do know that, right?
Quite true.

But we can utilize the Democratic Party -control collection of House committees as proxies.
Nope. Has to be a cause to change legislation. You’re really a fool
Incorrect.

Congress has the right under existing law to subpoena the complete Muller Report and its raw data.

Congress has the right under existing law to subpoena the tax returns of any citizen - including the President.

As to the "fool" part, well... yeah... you're probably right about that.

After all... here I am... arguing with an ignorant bumper-sticker echo-chamber... about existing US and IRS Code provisions.
 
...Except the public can't see Trump's taxes unless he okays it. You do know that, right?
Quite true.

But we can utilize the Democratic Party -control collection of House committees as proxies.
Nope. Has to be a cause to change legislation. You’re really a fool
Incorrect.

Congress has the right under existing law to
subpoena the complete Muller Report and its raw data.

Congress has the right under existing law to subpoena the tax returns of any citizen - including the President.

As to the "fool" part, well... yeah... you're probably right about that.

After all... here I am... arguing with an ignorant bumper-sticker echo-chamber... about existing US and IRS Code provisions.
no, no it doesn't. here.

28 CFR § 600.8 - Notification and reports by the Special Counsel.

Show me where in this link it says congress has the power you described? please.
 

Forum List

Back
Top