Oh, how convenient. When it's Jesus, he obviously didn't exist because you say there's no proof; when it's Muhammad, he DID exist, but that's "just an opinion" that you formed without any proof at all to base your "opinion" on.I would like to see the proof you based this claim on.Mohammed did exist.
As of now it is just an opinion.
Come now, surely you realize the fallacious reasoning behind your question.Do you have proof he did not exist?
And now you fall back upon belief. You believe that Muhammad existed, and although he believed that Jesus existed, you reject Jesus because you haven't seen any proof that Jesus is real, and while the same can be said of you not having seen proof of Muhammad's existence, you don't dispute that.His existence is much easier to believe because he had the vices of all men.
Explain to me how you can justify your beliefs that Jesus didn't exist but Muhammad did when you base both of them on the same amount of evidence: None.