Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops “Sharia Court”

wow. you really are mayor of crazyland.

ROFLMNAO!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
can't argue with someone that thinks they have the ability to define what is and is not a religion based on their opinion of what some followers do. that's trying to argue with crazy. just like it's arguing with crazy when someone really believes that you can tell people they can't agree to arbitration. that's a crazy notion completely without merit.
 
100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.
so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?

The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
 
wow. you really are mayor of crazyland.

ROFLMNAO!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
can't argue with someone that thinks they have the ability to define what is and is not a religion... .

That's true, you can't.

But in fairness to you, there's no potential defense from such. A Religious belief does not give anything a right to murder innocent people as a means to acquire political power. Where one claims such a right, based upon their religion, they've forfeited any means for that idea to be considered a RELIGION... in a land where the CORE PRINCIPLE is that EVERYONE IS EQUAL BEFORE GOD, thus before the law... and NO INDIVIDUAL HAS A RIGHT BEYOND THE RIGHTS OF THE NEXT MAN.

See how that works?

American Principle trumps Islam.
 
Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

within the law, not separate laws that don't conform to the state's
do you have a point?


>>
Sharia law advocates many practices that conflict with the rights afforded under the United States Constitution and/or violate state and federal law including:


  • Abolition of adoption rights otherwise granted under American laws.
  • Abolition of Wills, Inheritance Instruments and Last Testaments established under American laws.
  • Abolition of certain interest income otherwise specified in loan, mortgage and other borrowing documents.
  • Diminished rights of women in court. It takes the testimony of two women to equal one man in Sharia court.
  • Polygamy, Muslim men may marry up to four wives.
  • Muslim husbands are given the right to beat their wives as a form of discipline.
  • Severe discipline toward women including isolation, discrimination, full body cover, genital mutilation and beatings.
  • Savage retribution including amputating limbs and gouging out eyes for crimes like theft.
  • Barbaric marital punishment toward women including rape, honor killing and public stoning.
    <<

  • Women might not be aware or allowed access to state courts instead of the sharia tribunal. They might be threatened that the state will arrest them or be harsher. They might be deported.

  • Women and children might not believe they will be allowed to appeal to the state courts that the state takes far too long, witnesses and evidence might be lost or police and courts will manhandle and force women to remove their coverings. Some might be told that they would have to swear on a bible. If they go to the state courts they will be outcasts in their community and family.

  • It is not such a simple thing for many








 
100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.
so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?

The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.
 
Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

within the law, not separate laws that don't conform to the state's
do you have a point?


>>
Sharia law advocates many practices that conflict with the rights afforded under the United States Constitution and/or violate state and federal law including:


  • Abolition of adoption rights otherwise granted under American laws.
  • Abolition of Wills, Inheritance Instruments and Last Testaments established under American laws.
  • Abolition of certain interest income otherwise specified in loan, mortgage and other borrowing documents.
  • Diminished rights of women in court. It takes the testimony of two women to equal one man in Sharia court.
  • Polygamy, Muslim men may marry up to four wives.
  • Muslim husbands are given the right to beat their wives as a form of discipline.
  • Severe discipline toward women including isolation, discrimination, full body cover, genital mutilation and beatings.
  • Savage retribution including amputating limbs and gouging out eyes for crimes like theft.
  • Barbaric marital punishment toward women including rape, honor killing and public stoning.
    <<

  • Women might not be aware or allowed access to state courts instead of the sharia tribunal. They might be threatened that the state will arrest them or be harsher. They might be deported.

  • Women and children might not believe they will be allowed to appeal to the state courts that the state takes far too long, witnesses and evidence might be lost or police and courts will manhandle and force women to remove their coverings. Some might be told that they would have to swear on a bible. If they go to the state courts they will be outcasts in their community and family.

  • It is not such a simple thing for many
lots of good reasons for a woman not to agree to one of those courts.
and if you have evidence of an arbitrator in the u.s., any arbitrator, gouging out eyes, chopping off hands, ordering someone to beat anyone else, or whatever other form of illegal punishment feel free to post it.
i'll wait.
 
Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

Good point

If the Muslim courts break our laws, the local justice system can step in

But if a married couple agrees to go to a muslim court to resolve their differences there is little a grandstanding mayor can do

Yeah, if the court directs the man to take his wife home and beat her, you'd be all for it.

You have a problem with reading comprehension?
 
Third party civil arbitration is completely legal in the US.

Is the Sharia court only hearing civil cases? Do you what sharia law says punishment for adultery is? 100 lashes. For homosexuality? Death.

Good point

If the Muslim courts break our laws, the local justice system can step in

But if a married couple agrees to go to a muslim court to resolve their differences there is little a grandstanding mayor can do

To get a divorce the final decree must be signed by a judge or it's not legal.

Very true

And in this case, the couple would not file for divorce if it was not permitted by their muslim court
 
Someone said this was grandstanding earlier. I agree. There is no way this can be enforced. The people that dont conform will be ostracized and the other people will abide by Sharia law as part of their culture and religion.
 
Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops "Sharia Court"... Here Is Her EPIC Response! - The Political Insider

"This radical group of Muslims is not pleased with the Mayor of Irving, Texas after she put the end to America’s first “Sharia Court.” Mayor Beth Van Duyne has accused mosque leaders of creating separate laws for Muslims, which is why the city voted to stop these supposedly “voluntary” tribunals from operating.

In a very close 5-4 vote, the city of Irving ruled to back the Texas state bill banning foreign law from the state. The bill doesn’t mention Sharia or any religion, but it’s a huge defeat for Sharia supporters, as such courts are in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Here is how Mayor Duyne responded on Facebook, before the historic and controversial vote:

facebook11.png


The mayor is a bigoted idiot. That was not a sharia court. It was arbritation - completely legal, and multiple religious groups have used it (Jews and Catholics for instance). Talk about ignorant spin.
 
100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?

A LASH... is A FELONY.

Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.
so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?

The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.

"It" is Islam... which stands wholly antithetical to the principles that define AMERICA. And as an AMERICAN... that is all I need to know ABOUT Islam to reject Islam, entirely and without exception to any of its evil facets.
 
Muslims are ANGRY at Texas Mayor After She Stops "Sharia Court"... Here Is Her EPIC Response! - The Political Insider

"This radical group of Muslims is not pleased with the Mayor of Irving, Texas after she put the end to America’s first “Sharia Court.” Mayor Beth Van Duyne has accused mosque leaders of creating separate laws for Muslims, which is why the city voted to stop these supposedly “voluntary” tribunals from operating.

In a very close 5-4 vote, the city of Irving ruled to back the Texas state bill banning foreign law from the state. The bill doesn’t mention Sharia or any religion, but it’s a huge defeat for Sharia supporters, as such courts are in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Here is how Mayor Duyne responded on Facebook, before the historic and controversial vote:

facebook11.png


The mayor is a bigoted idiot. That was not a sharia court. It was arbritation - completely legal, and multiple religious groups have used it (Jews and Catholics for instance). Talk about ignorant spin.
They will probably go to court over this and have the law or whatever it is removed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top