Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. your objection has nothing to do with whether or not lashes are a felony and everything to do with your hatred of islam.so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?100 lashes is better than death, which is what the old testament proscribes for adultery. where's the outrage over jewish arbitration?
A LASH... is A FELONY.
Not much lower than the FELONY for 'intentionally causing death'.
The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
"It" is Islam... which stands wholly antithetical to the principles that define AMERICA. And as an AMERICAN... that is all I need to know ABOUT Islam to reject Islam, entirely and without exception to any of its evil facets.
The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
The absolute COOLEST thing about the use of the word "bigot"; where such is advanced to frame the character of another, is that it is a marvelous demonstration of BIGOTRY!
HYSTERICALLY! ... such is a paradox that is lost to the Intellectually Less Fortunate. So it happens among them... as a matter of ROUTINE!
it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...
You always say this when you get exposed as an idiot. Does it have some kind of calming effect on you?The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
The absolute COOLEST thing about the use of the word "bigot"; where such is advanced to frame the character of another, is that it is a marvelous demonstration of BIGOTRY!
HYSTERICALLY! ... such is a paradox that is lost to the Intellectually Less Fortunate. So it happens among them... as a matter of ROUTINE!
The absolute coolest thing about your statement is.....you actually think you said something
it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?
The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
"It" is Islam... which stands wholly antithetical to the principles that define AMERICA. And as an AMERICAN... that is all I need to know ABOUT Islam to reject Islam, entirely and without exception to any of its evil facets.
The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.
so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.so why don't you complain about jewish arbitration again?
The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
"It" is Islam... which stands wholly antithetical to the principles that define AMERICA. And as an AMERICAN... that is all I need to know ABOUT Islam to reject Islam, entirely and without exception to any of its evil facets.
The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.
Someone said this was grandstanding earlier. I agree. There is no way this can be enforced. The people that dont conform will be ostracized and the other people will abide by Sharia law as part of their culture and religion.
The absolute coolest thing about your statement is.....you actually think you said something
OH! A demonstration of intellectual impotence, advanced as a means to concede the point?
Now how adorable is THAT? Thank you Vulva... and I want you to know that I recognize that you're doing THE VERY BEST YOU CAN! Bless you lil' black heart.
Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
gotta be some sort of ocdYou always say this when you get exposed as an idiot. Does it have some kind of calming effect on you?The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
The absolute COOLEST thing about the use of the word "bigot"; where such is advanced to frame the character of another, is that it is a marvelous demonstration of BIGOTRY!
HYSTERICALLY! ... such is a paradox that is lost to the Intellectually Less Fortunate. So it happens among them... as a matter of ROUTINE!
I was thinking about the Amish. I got to talk to them alot where I use to work and they hate the US legal system. They have their own.Someone said this was grandstanding earlier. I agree. There is no way this can be enforced. The people that dont conform will be ostracized and the other people will abide by Sharia law as part of their culture and religion.
It is not just muslims who hold religious courts to rule on local or personal matters
Christians do it, Mormons, Amish, Orthodox Jews, Scientologists
If the members of the faith agree to it, there is little a grandstanding mayor can do about it
The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
The absolute COOLEST thing about the use of the word "bigot"; where such is advanced to frame the character of another, is that it is a marvelous demonstration of BIGOTRY!
HYSTERICALLY! ... such is a paradox that is lost to the Intellectually Less Fortunate. So it happens among them... as a matter of ROUTINE!
Even if she does she is still a bigot. Its pretty transparent she is doing it specifically towards muslims.The mayor is a bigoted idiot. ... .
The absolute COOLEST thing about the use of the word "bigot"; where such is advanced to frame the character of another, is that it is a marvelous demonstration of BIGOTRY!
HYSTERICALLY! ... such is a paradox that is lost to the Intellectually Less Fortunate. So it happens among them... as a matter of ROUTINE!
Unless the mayor applies her edicts to ALL religions in her community, she is a bigot
They aren't illegal. ...
again, you're just making shit up. that's a sure sign that you have no idea what you're talking about, and we'll duly note your concession.They aren't illegal. ...
They literally are... . As where any individual or group of individual knowingly conceals a crime, they are complicit in that crime. Thus, where a body is established to hear evidence of criminal behavior and fails to notify relevant authorities of such, they are complicit in concealing the crime, therefore they are complicit IN THE CRIME.
Now, if the issue is civil... and it is an in-house body which seeks to mediate disagreements or to enforce the rules relevant SPECIFICALLY and EXCLUSIVELY to the entity at issue... then anyone or any group is entitled to hold such a hearing. But the terms handed down by such are not legally binding, except with they have written agreements and the agreement does not set aside any of their respective rights.
The issue here is that Islamists came looking for Government Sanction... in order to raise its perceived status in the hopes of establishing itself as a legally recognized body.
Where did they come looking for government sanction? Do you have a link because its not in the one provided in the OP.They aren't illegal. ...
They literally are... . As where any individual or group of individual knowingly conceals a crime, they are complicit in that crime. Thus, where a body is established to hear evidence of criminal behavior and fails to notify relevant authorities of such, they are complicit in concealing the crime, therefore they are complicit IN THE CRIME.
Now, if the issue is civil... and it is an in-house body which seeks to mediate disagreements or to enforce the rules relevant SPECIFICALLY and EXCLUSIVELY to the entity at issue... then anyone or any group is entitled to hold such a hearing. But the terms handed down by such are not legally binding, except with they have written agreements and the agreement does not set aside any of their respective rights.
The issue here is that Islamists came looking for Government Sanction... in order to raise its perceived status in the hopes of establishing itself as a legally recognized body.
so judge judy is illegal? the people's court is illegal? jewish and amish courts... illegal?it, in my sentence, actually referred to your objection to the courts. ...so it has nothing to do with whether or not a lash or death is a felony... it's that you just hate islam.The Jews aren't running a "Religion" that rests ENTIRELY upon the use of mass-murder to acquire political power. And they have history of peaceful cohabitation, several THOUSAND years longer than Islam, whose history of such is -0- of its 1200 years.
"It" is Islam... which stands wholly antithetical to the principles that define AMERICA. And as an AMERICAN... that is all I need to know ABOUT Islam to reject Islam, entirely and without exception to any of its evil facets.
The Courts ... which are illegal in the United States, because we already have a legal system, which rests in principle rejected by ISLAM. Which is the basis of my REJECTION OF SUCH.
why aren't you protesting them?
incidentally, none of those are illegal.
again, you're just making shit up. ...
They aren't illegal. ...
They literally are... . As where any individual or group of individual knowingly conceals a crime, they are complicit in that crime. Thus, where a body is established to hear evidence of criminal behavior and fails to notify relevant authorities of such, they are complicit in concealing the crime, therefore they are complicit IN THE CRIME.
Now, if the issue is civil... and it is an in-house body which seeks to mediate disagreements or to enforce the rules relevant SPECIFICALLY and EXCLUSIVELY to the entity at issue... then anyone or any group is entitled to hold such a hearing. But the terms handed down by such are not legally binding, except with they have written agreements and the agreement does not set aside any of their respective rights.
The issue here is that Islamists came looking for Government Sanction... in order to raise its perceived status in the hopes of establishing itself as a legally recognized body.
