N S A "we don need no stinkin warrant!"

JoeBlam

Rookie
Jun 1, 2013
1,742
188
0
So yesterday we saw Soetoro's NSA claiming they only listened in on "300" phone calls last year. So John and Jane Doe are probably thinking: "hey, that's less than one a day" shrug their shoulders and head out to drop off Jimmy Doe at soccer practice. 300. Seems reasonable, right?

WRONG! :eek: That's yet another LIE intended to smooth over the latest of Barry's numerous scandals. According to who(m)? How about Jerrold Nadler...as fervent a leftist BIG BROTHER type as you'll ever run across:

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed on Thursday that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed "simply based on an analyst deciding that."

If the NSA wants "to listen to the phone," an analyst's decision is sufficient, without any other legal authorization required, Nadler said he learned. "I was rather startled," said Nadler, an attorney and congressman who serves on the House Judiciary committee.

Not only does this disclosure shed more light on how the NSA's formidable eavesdropping apparatus works domestically, it also suggests the Justice Department has secretly interpreted federal surveillance law to permit thousands of low-ranking analysts to eavesdrop on phone calls.

phone_cord_cut.jpg



Because the same legal standards that apply to phone calls also apply to e-mail messages, text messages, and instant messages, being able to listen to phone calls would mean the NSA analysts could also access the contents of Internet communications without going before a court and seeking approval.

Nadler's initial statement appears to confirm some of the allegations made by Edward Snowden, a former NSA infrastructure analyst who leaked classified documents to the Guardian. Snowden said in a video interview that, while not all NSA analysts had this ability, he could from Hawaii "wiretap anyone from you or your accountant to a federal judge to even the president."

There are serious "constitutional problems" with this approach, said Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. "It epitomizes the problem of secret laws."

The NSA declined to comment to CNET. (This is unrelated to the disclosure that the NSA is currently collecting records of the metadata of all domestic Verizon calls, but not the actual contents of the conversations.)

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released a statement on Sunday saying: "The statement that a single analyst can eavesdrop on domestic communications without proper legal authorization is incorrect and was not briefed to Congress." Clapper's statement did not elaborate, however, on what "proper" authorization would be. Some reports have suggested that permission from a "shift supervisor" would also be required


HEY, that's reassuring right? Think for a minute about how much above some customer-service rep in New Delhi, India their "shift supervisor" is....I've asked to be returned to the first idiot I spoke with in the past. These NSA spooks don't even bother coming up with good lies anymore. TEAR THIS WHOLE OPERATION DOWN AND RETURN THE SPYCRAFT GAME TO THE APOLITICAL CIA WHERE IS BELONGS! :eusa_eh:

4 Free Proxy - Free Proxy to access blocked websites
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top