The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
- Feb 16, 2013
- 13,383
- 3,659
I am personally a supporter of a national healthcare model. In my opinion the health insurance should be a non-profit function of government that strives to reduce the costs of healthcare (for it's own sake) at the least expense to the health of its citizens.
That being said, there is a glaring hole in a national health care model, one so large, that is makes private health insurance monumentally superior to a government plan under current Law.
The doctrine of Sovereign Immunity prevents the government from being sued, unless the Government Consents to being sued.
As such, the Government will only sue when it believes it will win, and will only allow itself to be sued when it believes that you will lose.
So if we had National Health Care, and the Government decided to deny or disparage my right to health insurance, what recourse would I have since the government would not allow me to sue them?
That being said, there is a glaring hole in a national health care model, one so large, that is makes private health insurance monumentally superior to a government plan under current Law.
The doctrine of Sovereign Immunity prevents the government from being sued, unless the Government Consents to being sued.
As such, the Government will only sue when it believes it will win, and will only allow itself to be sued when it believes that you will lose.
So if we had National Health Care, and the Government decided to deny or disparage my right to health insurance, what recourse would I have since the government would not allow me to sue them?