Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Impeachment is contained in the Constitution and this was a perfect impeachment.America is in a constitutional crisis. A real one. The person third in line to suceed the President has clearly lost her marbles. Isn't it an emergency that needs to be rectified Imediately?
You just said you didn't, so you obviously don't think there were impeachable offenses.Hmmmm..................who to believe...........a halfwit libnut hack on the innerweb, or a Constitutional Scholar on Impeachment?
He was wrong when he testified for the Dems and he is wrong now.
Something you and him share...you are always wrong.
Did you believe the Constitutional Scholar on Impeachment when he was testifying against Trump?
You just said you didn't, so you obviously don't think there were impeachable offenses.
oops!
oh that's easy, the halfwit internet guy is much more knowledgeable than a constitutional lawyer or scholar. that's a slam dunk. I expect he will tell you he was too.Hmmmm..................who to believe...........a halfwit libnut hack on the innerweb, or a Constitutional Scholar on Impeachment?
He was wrong when he testified for the Dems and he is wrong now.
Something you and him share...you are always wrong.
Who says so?Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding backDidn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court NomineesThe US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
Funny how that stuff works out
I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.
Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.
Jo
Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict
Who says so?Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding backDidn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court NomineesThe US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
Funny how that stuff works out
I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.
Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.
Jo
Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict
It is not in the Constitution.
The House will prosecute the case in the Senate
They can send the case when Pelosi says so
Let Impeached President Trump run on his impeachment
Who says so?Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding backDidn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court NomineesThe US Constitution clearly states that the Senate SHALL HAVE the sole power to try all impeachments. Nazi can't withhold that from the Senate. If she does, she is in violation of the Constitution, and Trump wasn't impeached.
Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.
Impeachment in the United States - Wikipedia
Funny how that stuff works out
I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.
Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.
Jo
Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict
It is not in the Constitution.
The House will prosecute the case in the Senate
They can send the case when Pelosi says so
Let Impeached President Trump run on his impeachment
She's going to send them to the Senate.
She never said she would not.... That was everyone else talking but her.
This is where Mitch tells her to pound sand. Nazi has no say in how the Senate operates.MUST - no doubt
WHEN - whenever she and the House agree to.
suck that.
neither you or the senate can tell her when to send the articles SO STFU
Wow. I'm STILL living rent-free in your head?Here at the USMB, when a person repeatedly claims that they don’t care about something.....but can’t stop posting about that something....it is known as “daving”. Named after the master daveman.
Trust me. Bootney Lee Farnsworth does not care. He’s not affected by the totally corrupt and unfair impeachment of that innocent and great man who is hated by that bitch Pelosi and all of those retarded dupes in the Democrat party. He’s just having fun watching the show. Not a care in the world. No sir.
Wow. I'm STILL living rent-free in your head?Here at the USMB, when a person repeatedly claims that they don’t care about something.....but can’t stop posting about that something....it is known as “daving”. Named after the master daveman.
Trust me. Bootney Lee Farnsworth does not care. He’s not affected by the totally corrupt and unfair impeachment of that innocent and great man who is hated by that bitch Pelosi and all of those retarded dupes in the Democrat party. He’s just having fun watching the show. Not a care in the world. No sir.
Dood. That's creepy as hell.
Suck what. Yours is so small I'd need a pair of tweezers to even find it. Since the matter is left up between the houses of Congress and the Senate is the Jury to rule on the impeachment and the House's role is finished, failure to provide and time therein rests solely with the Senate to determine and not even the Supreme Court can say otherwise.MUST - no doubt
WHEN - whenever she and the House agree to.
suck that.
In the meantime, she is trying to EXTORT the Senate for a QUID PRO QUO.She's going to send them to the Senate.
She never said she would not.... That was everyone else talking but her.
Oops!!
Political stunt?Who says so?Too late for that. The time for holding back was before the vote was taken, if she wanted to include the testimony. As it stands now, it's just a rank political stunt.She can point to pending court decisions as justification for holding backDidn’t see a timeframe there just like you didn’t see a timeframe on the Senate approving Supreme Court Nominees
Funny how that stuff works out
I suppose she could hold out until December to see what the house and Senate look like but I believe SCOTUS Will intervene at that point and toss it.
Her problem is that she knows it's DOA in the Senate And it drives her crazy that she cannot control that.
Jo
Second Article is Obstruction of Congress. If the court instructs Trump to release records and allow testimony and Trump refuses, Senate has no choice but to convict
It is not in the Constitution.
The House will prosecute the case in the Senate
They can send the case when Pelosi says so
Let Impeached President Trump run on his impeachment
I say it's a rank political stunt because it's glaringly obvious that Pelosi is trying to force a particular outcome and is trying to control the Senate to get it. Let her try to defend that on the campaign trail. It's an easy one for Trump, because all he has to do is repeat over and over again that she's scared to send the articles over because she knows they'll be dismissed. If he can goad her into sending them, they're either immediately dismissed or the democrats have to stay in session and can't campaign. The longer she waits, the harder her choice becomes.
The Great Pelosi is trying to present her case to the Senate in the best way possible.In the meantime, she is trying to EXTORT the Senate for a QUID PRO QUO.She's going to send them to the Senate.
She never said she would not.... That was everyone else talking but her.
Oops!!
I agree
trump is not impeached till the issue reaches the senate
