CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,661
- 69,797
- 2,330
Fascists NATIONALIZED the HEALTH CARE AND OIL industries and BANNED PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF GUNS.
what self-respecting right-winger would do that?
Jake Starkey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fascists NATIONALIZED the HEALTH CARE AND OIL industries and BANNED PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF GUNS.
what self-respecting right-winger would do that?
It was "pilfered" from the Encyclopedia Britannica, if you read the OP you wouldn't need to ask. You are free and encouraged to disagree with me, but in doing so I suggest you put away the personal attacks and make a concise and credible argument. Calling my argument a failure is childish, suggesting my source was a "libtard website" was ridiculous. I suggest you find a new hobby, it would be better than embarrassing yourself as you do here.
There are thick books written on the various forms of socialism and fascism, and therefore, a paragraph from the Encyclopedia (most likely created by a liberal college profesor) is not adequate to prove anything more than your own bias on the subject.
Both Socialism and Fascism are methods of government control of people, and they are not mutually exclusive. Both exist in black and white, and in every shade in between absolute freedom and absolute govermental control.
NEO Fascism: Neo means "New", and it is defined in my signature.
If that's the case, then Lincoln did not value democracy or the rule of law either. Right Fakey?
False equivalency, bripat. Lincoln would have protected you, while Steinie and pinochet would have destroyed you.
ROFL! Lincoln had people who criticized his administration executed without a trial. He put thousands of people in a concentration camps. He shut down 300 newspapers for printing articles critical of his administration. Lincoln makes Pinochet look like a choir boy.
Those on the far right who claim to be conservatives and call all of us who question their ideology "commies", "Marxists", "Socialists" and "Leftists" (among other pejoratives) need to be called exactly what they are: Neo fascists.
It's the concept of the 'far right' that is problematic. Who are you talking about? In particular, where do you put libertarians in the stilted left/right axis?
Of course he does. His term "neo fascism" is meant to be a slur against everyone who supports limited government and economic freedom.
Which libtard website did you pilfer that from? the rich got richer, and still are 5 years into a very leftist agenda. In other words...thread fail.
It was "pilfered" from the Encyclopedia Britannica, if you read the OP you wouldn't need to ask. You are free and encouraged to disagree with me, but in doing so I suggest you put away the personal attacks and make a concise and credible argument. Calling my argument a failure is childish, suggesting my source was a "libtard website" was ridiculous. I suggest you find a new hobby, it would be better than embarrassing yourself as you do here.
There are thick books written on the various forms of socialism and fascism, and therefore, a paragraph from the Encyclopedia (most likely created by a liberal college profesor) is not adequate to prove anything more than your own bias on the subject.
Both Socialism and Fascism are methods of government control of people, and they are not mutually exclusive. Both exist in black and white, and in every shade in between absolute freedom and absolute govermental control.
It's the concept of the 'far right' that is problematic. Who are you talking about? In particular, where do you put libertarians in the stilted left/right axis?
Of course he does. His term "neo fascism" is meant to be a slur against everyone who supports limited government and economic freedom.
Government limited by and economic freedom for neo-fascists.
Yes, bripat, you have it.
Of course he does. His term "neo fascism" is meant to be a slur against everyone who supports limited government and economic freedom.
Government limited by and economic freedom for neo-fascists.
Yes, bripat, you have it.
Progressives/liberals have speech codes on their college campuses
they chase away people they dont want to hear speak
they engage in group think
they savagely attack any monority that dares to leave the liberal plantaton
they purged almost every Blue Dog from the Dem Party
it's laughable for left-wing nutjobs to try to call anybody else a fascist
"Fascists NATIONALIZED the HEALTH CARE AND OIL industries and BANNED PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OF GUNS. what self-respecting right-winger would do that?["
The Germans had national health care when Adolph was growing up in Austria.
The fascists did not not nationalize the oil industry.
Hitler, as a far right reactionary, killed all the socialist in Germany.
Hitler would love bedowin, his type of person.
Which libtard website did you pilfer that from? the rich got richer, and still are 5 years into a very leftist agenda. In other words...thread fail.Those on the far right who claim to be conservatives and call all of us who question their ideology "commies", "Marxists", "Socialists" and "Leftists" (among other pejoratives) need to be called exactly what they are: Neo fascists.
From the Encyclopedia Britannica:
"Neo fascism is a political philosophy and movement that arose in Europe in the decades following World War II. Like earlier fascist movements, neo fascism advocated extreme nationalism, opposed liberal individualism, attacked Marxist and other left-wing ideologies, indulged in racist and xenophobic scapegoating, and promoted populist right-wing economic programs. Unlike the fascists, however, neo fascist's placed more blame for their countries problems on non-European immigrants than on leftists and Jews"
Why do they hide behind a misnomer label, they're in no way or manner real conservatives? Neo fascists support economic policies which benefit the Corporate America and the power elite. As corporatist's many who support such policies are not in the same class as the rich and powerful; why they do is an interesting question best left to the psychologists.
It was "pilfered" from the Encyclopedia Britannica, if you read the OP you wouldn't need to ask. You are free and encouraged to disagree with me, but in doing so I suggest you put away the personal attacks and make a concise and credible argument. Calling my argument a failure is childish, suggesting my source was a "libtard website" was ridiculous. I suggest you find a new hobby, it would be better than embarrassing yourself as you do here.
True. But the Line-Item Veto puts the POTUS on the spot and when used puts greater visibility on The Congress.
Which is essentially meaningless. The Congress and President already have enough visibility and it doesn't stop them from doing anything.
In therapy your counselor would call you on your, "Yes, but" responses. As I said, we'll never agree and I tire in the attempt to respond to such banalities.
This thread is about bripat, bedowin62 and the other Neo Fascists who pretend to be something other than what they are.
Those on the far right who claim to be conservatives and call all of us who question their ideology "commies", "Marxists", "Socialists" and "Leftists" (among other pejoratives) need to be called exactly what they are: Neo fascists.
From the Encyclopedia Britannica:
"Neo fascism is a political philosophy and movement that arose in Europe in the decades following World War II. Like earlier fascist movements, neo fascism advocated extreme nationalism, opposed liberal individualism, attacked Marxist and other left-wing ideologies, indulged in racist and xenophobic scapegoating, and promoted populist right-wing economic programs. Unlike the fascists, however, neo fascist's placed more blame for their countries problems on non-European immigrants than on leftists and Jews"
Why do they hide behind a misnomer label, they're in no way or manner real conservatives? Neo fascists support economic policies which benefit the Corporate America and the power elite. As corporatist's many who support such policies are not in the same class as the rich and powerful; why they do is an interesting question best left to the psychologists.
isnt it nice to see the Left excuse themselves from mass genocide by saying the millions of Germans who went out and stuffed people into ovens only THOUGHT they were doing so in the name of their beloved SOCIALIST WORKER'S PARTY???
isnt it nice to see the Left excuse themselves from mass genocide by saying the millions of Germans who went out and stuffed people into ovens only THOUGHT they were doing so in the name of their beloved SOCIALIST WORKER'S PARTY???
Hitler had nothing to do with the left --- unless you consider murdering, torturing, imprisoning and making the first prisoners at Dachau 'having something to do with'.
isnt it nice to see the Left excuse themselves from mass genocide by saying the millions of Germans who went out and stuffed people into ovens only THOUGHT they were doing so in the name of their beloved SOCIALIST WORKER'S PARTY???
Hitler had nothing to do with the left --- unless you consider murdering, torturing, imprisoning and making the first prisoners at Dachau 'having something to do with'.
Hitler called himself and his Party Socialists
it's right in the name dork
gosh you're stupid