Nevada Election Officials Investigating Hillary Campaign

[theDoctorisIn]

The claims made in the Moonie Times article are all based on press releases from Judicial Watch. The Post story is about how the "scandal" is affecting her popularity, not about your somewhat hysterical claims of "perjury" and "gaps".

If that is true, then Hillary's lawyers will demand a retraction............Without this Hillary is admitting that it is true. The FBI report is coming, with cuffs included.

If what is true?

Be specific. Which of the outlandish claims made by an right wing activist group founded with the express purpose of hassling the Clintons are you referring to?

Why would the Moonie Times care what Hillary "demanded" in terms of retractions? It's not like they have a reputation to uphold.

If it is true that there are not 5 months of e-mails missing, Hillary will demand a retraction, if not is assumed to be true. The FBI already knows if it is true or not as they have an A-Team investigating.

Where do you get this "demand a retraction" stuff from?

Why would the Moonie Times acquiesce to any "demands" from Hillary?

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

 

[Bassman007]

If that is true, then Hillary's lawyers will demand a retraction............Without this Hillary is admitting that it is true. The FBI report is coming, with cuffs included.

If what is true?

Be specific. Which of the outlandish claims made by an right wing activist group founded with the express purpose of hassling the Clintons are you referring to?

Why would the Moonie Times care what Hillary "demanded" in terms of retractions? It's not like they have a reputation to uphold.

If it is true that there are not 5 months of e-mails missing, Hillary will demand a retraction, if not is assumed to be true. The FBI already knows if it is true or not as they have an A-Team investigating.

Where do you get this "demand a retraction" stuff from?

Why would the Moonie Times acquiesce to any "demands" from Hillary?

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

 

[Care4all]

Might have been the librarian who actually witnessed the misconduct and showed the law to the people campaigning and registering voters at the same time.

Possibly. But not likely.

Either way, she'll likely be interviewed for the investigation since she was so prominent in the video, an eye witness is hard to refute.

I can almost guarantee the "investigation" won't get that far.

Almost, only counts in hand grenades, horse shoes and atom bombs.

Well, we will see.

we need to see an UNEDITED TAPE... any person KNOWING o'Keefe's record KNOWS we must view the full, unedited tape because he's a KNOWN liar....

so, i wont get excited over this....till we find out and see what we missed...through his editing.

 

[Bassman007]

Possibly. But not likely.

Either way, she'll likely be interviewed for the investigation since she was so prominent in the video, an eye witness is hard to refute.

I can almost guarantee the "investigation" won't get that far.

Almost, only counts in hand grenades, horse shoes and atom bombs.

Well, we will see.

we need to see an UNEDITED TAPE... any person KNOWING o'Keefe's record KNOWS we must view the full, unedited tape because he's a KNOWN liar....

so, i wont get excited over this....till we find out and see what we missed...through his editing.

Hillary's lawyer in Nevada has deleted her webpage, and is probably wiping her computer and registering as a republican at this point.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I wouldn't get your hopes up.

Any actual legal investigation based on a James O'Keefe video is invariably going to end up turning up bullshit. Look at the quote from the "top election official" mentioned in the headline:

“We do have an official complaint referencing the video,” Wayne Thorley, deputy secretary for elections in Nevada’s Secretary of State’s office, told Breitbart News. “The complaint was filed 2:30 local Nevada Time today. We will be investigating the complaint.”

In other words, some yahoo saw the video, believed it, and filed a complaint.

I don't expect anything to happen. My point is that this kind of shady stuff is always circling her and you aren't seeing this with any of the other candidates on either side of the aisle.

If you snuck a video camera into any political office of any of the campaigns, you'd be able to get the same videos. I've seen the equivalent of that video happen on every campaign I've ever worked on, and I've heard about it from every campaign that anyone I know has ever worked on.

This just isn't a big deal to anyone who knows how they make the sausage.

Laughable

Not a big deal to anyone in the know

Demanding & expecting ethical behavior is just soooo radical huh

No, it's not "radical" - it's childish and naive.

Ok, I'll just chalk you up as one of the no moral compass do anything to get elected scumbags.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

If what is true?

Be specific. Which of the outlandish claims made by an right wing activist group founded with the express purpose of hassling the Clintons are you referring to?

Why would the Moonie Times care what Hillary "demanded" in terms of retractions? It's not like they have a reputation to uphold.

If it is true that there are not 5 months of e-mails missing, Hillary will demand a retraction, if not is assumed to be true. The FBI already knows if it is true or not as they have an A-Team investigating.

Where do you get this "demand a retraction" stuff from?

Why would the Moonie Times acquiesce to any "demands" from Hillary?

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

 

[Care4all]

True. She does seem to be the victim of continuous false accusations. The only people to give them any credence is the crazy right fringe. Of the literally hundreds of false accusations made about her, how many have been proven to be false?

Actually you are partly correct, however the FBI is investigating this one and 12 judges are assigned to the case, are they all right fringe???

An investigation is not a finding of wrong doing. You should remember that after you had your hopes up so high about Benghazi, and were then disappointed.

Benghazi has turned out to be the biggest spy investigation of all time, involving a Secretary of State sending all her correspondence to Moscow.

So please try again.

Where are you getting this information?

his own delusional mind?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I wouldn't get your hopes up.

Any actual legal investigation based on a James O'Keefe video is invariably going to end up turning up bullshit. Look at the quote from the "top election official" mentioned in the headline:

“We do have an official complaint referencing the video,” Wayne Thorley, deputy secretary for elections in Nevada’s Secretary of State’s office, told Breitbart News. “The complaint was filed 2:30 local Nevada Time today. We will be investigating the complaint.”

In other words, some yahoo saw the video, believed it, and filed a complaint.

I don't expect anything to happen. My point is that this kind of shady stuff is always circling her and you aren't seeing this with any of the other candidates on either side of the aisle.

If you snuck a video camera into any political office of any of the campaigns, you'd be able to get the same videos. I've seen the equivalent of that video happen on every campaign I've ever worked on, and I've heard about it from every campaign that anyone I know has ever worked on.

This just isn't a big deal to anyone who knows how they make the sausage.

Laughable

Not a big deal to anyone in the know

Demanding & expecting ethical behavior is just soooo radical huh

No, it's not "radical" - it's childish and naive.

Ok, I'll just chalk you up as one of the no moral compass do anything to get elected scumbags.

If it makes you feel better to do so, then so be it. Whatever it takes to keep up the facade. If you're so damn worried about people mentioning Hillary Clinton while handing out voter registration forms, then there's nothing I can do for you.

Politics is an inherently dirty game.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I don't expect anything to happen. My point is that this kind of shady stuff is always circling her and you aren't seeing this with any of the other candidates on either side of the aisle.

If you snuck a video camera into any political office of any of the campaigns, you'd be able to get the same videos. I've seen the equivalent of that video happen on every campaign I've ever worked on, and I've heard about it from every campaign that anyone I know has ever worked on.

This just isn't a big deal to anyone who knows how they make the sausage.

Laughable

Not a big deal to anyone in the know

Demanding & expecting ethical behavior is just soooo radical huh

No, it's not "radical" - it's childish and naive.

Ok, I'll just chalk you up as one of the no moral compass do anything to get elected scumbags.

If it makes you feel better to do so, then so be it. Whatever it takes to keep up the facade. If you're so damn worried about people mentioning Hillary Clinton while handing out voter registration forms, then there's nothing I can do for you.

Politics is an inherently dirty game.

If that was what i was concerned about you would be correct in your assessment. Since we both know it isn't you're just another hack in a long line of hacks.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

If you snuck a video camera into any political office of any of the campaigns, you'd be able to get the same videos. I've seen the equivalent of that video happen on every campaign I've ever worked on, and I've heard about it from every campaign that anyone I know has ever worked on.

This just isn't a big deal to anyone who knows how they make the sausage.

Laughable

Not a big deal to anyone in the know

Demanding & expecting ethical behavior is just soooo radical huh

No, it's not "radical" - it's childish and naive.

Ok, I'll just chalk you up as one of the no moral compass do anything to get elected scumbags.

If it makes you feel better to do so, then so be it. Whatever it takes to keep up the facade. If you're so damn worried about people mentioning Hillary Clinton while handing out voter registration forms, then there's nothing I can do for you.

Politics is an inherently dirty game.

If that was what i was concerned about you would be correct in your assessment. Since we both know it isn't you're just another hack in a long line of hacks.

That's the topic of this thread. If not that, what is it that you're concerned about?

 

[Bassman007]

If it is true that there are not 5 months of e-mails missing, Hillary will demand a retraction, if not is assumed to be true. The FBI already knows if it is true or not as they have an A-Team investigating.

Where do you get this "demand a retraction" stuff from?

Why would the Moonie Times acquiesce to any "demands" from Hillary?

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Where do you get this "demand a retraction" stuff from?

Why would the Moonie Times acquiesce to any "demands" from Hillary?

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

 

[Care4all]

Either way, she'll likely be interviewed for the investigation since she was so prominent in the video, an eye witness is hard to refute.

I can almost guarantee the "investigation" won't get that far.

Almost, only counts in hand grenades, horse shoes and atom bombs.

Well, we will see.

we need to see an UNEDITED TAPE... any person KNOWING o'Keefe's record KNOWS we must view the full, unedited tape because he's a KNOWN liar....

so, i wont get excited over this....till we find out and see what we missed...through his editing.

Hillary's lawyer in Nevada has deleted her webpage, and is probably wiping her computer and registering as a republican at this point.

 

[Bassman007]

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.

Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.

Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.

What is this "twenty judges" thing you keep mentioning?

What "twenty judges" have been "assigned" to Hillary's emails?

 

[Bassman007]

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.

Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.

What is this "twenty judges" thing you keep mentioning?

What "twenty judges" have been "assigned" to Hillary's emails?

Actually this article says 17 judges, but this does not include the private lawsuits that have been filed, or whatever the FBI is doing. State Department Seeks Coordinating Judge in Clinton e-mail Cases So there are highly likely more than 17, or even 20

http://theweek.com/articles/576229/why-im-suing-state-department-over-hillary-clintons-email-scandal

 

[Care4all]

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.

Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.

What is this "twenty judges" thing you keep mentioning?

What "twenty judges" have been "assigned" to Hillary's emails?

Actually this article says 17 judges, but this does not include the private lawsuits that have been filed, or whatever the FBI is doing. State Department Seeks Coordinating Judge in Clinton e-mail Cases So there are highly likely more than 17, or even 20

Why I'm suing the State Department over Hillary Clinton's email scandal

Can't you clearly see that this article is bloviated bull crud? Seriously!
then it gives links to places like CNS news and Judicial Watch which is making money head to toe from his continual suits and all the hoopla he puts out....

then all this crap on calling it a secret email account which again is just utter bull crud since anyone in the gvt trying to reach her via email can see they were not sending their messages to a .gov account....

the whole thing is simply Right wing sensationalism....

And no one, absolutely NO ONE in the government has even come close to indicating she is a criminal as you all state NOR that any criminal charges are even being considered against her....

NOTHING in this article or linking articles show any evidence of any of this...it's all hot air....

Which I admit, you guys and you right wing media are really good at....bloviating and building up your own delusional conspiracies....

you deserve a few more BRAVOS

Republicans are the winners. CONGRATS!!!

the winners in 2 categories

The Best Bullshitters

The Most Gullible

People are innocent in this great Nation of ours, until PROVEN guilty in a Court of Law, lest we forget.

 

[Shrimpbox]

Dude stop pretending to be stupider than dirt. If The Daily Caller has defamed Hillary with this article, Hillary is well within her rights to demand a retraction. Since she is not doing this, she is admitting guilt Hillary Clinton Emails Have A FIVE-Month Gap

That's some brilliant "logic" right there.

The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.

Wrong the State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge


State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge

The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.

Yawn, you are really silly.

If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.

From your link:

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.

The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained “gaps,” according to internal department messages evaluating her production.

Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.

Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account she’d used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.

The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 — a month before she left office.

Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clinton’s messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as “gaps.”

Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clinton’s last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.

“We are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,” the department said. “There is no ‘gap’ in Secretary Clinton’s sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her ‘sent’ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.”

Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clinton’s assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.

“The Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “I suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.”

The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over — 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.

One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clinton’s personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the department’s early thoughts about the documents.

The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents

As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.

No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.

I will take that bet doc, although that includes if her lawyers negotiate a way to keep her out of jail, probation, and fines and indictments for her help.

 

[BULLDOG]

An investigation is not a finding of wrong doing. You should remember that after you had your hopes up so high about Benghazi, and were then disappointed.

Benghazi has turned out to be the biggest spy investigation of all time, involving a Secretary of State sending all her correspondence to Moscow.

So please try again.

Let me guess, you know this because you have "friends" involved in super-secret government stuff.

No need, the freedom of information act is in play here, and EVERYTHING that is not directly of National Security will be made public. Are you living in a cave or something? Bye the way Hillary did not disclose all of her e-mails as there is now a proven 5 month gap, that the OBAMA STATE DEPT. SAYS WILL MEAN A PERJURY CHARGE IF NOT FILLED.............................

Hillary is over, so start talking Biden, or Sanderewski or whatever his name is.

So lets rejoice O Lord.............

You put way too much faith in Judicial Watch.

The fact that they've never been right about anything before should have given you a little hint.

Where are you getting this information about "Benghazi" turning into the "biggest spy investigation of all time"?

Well lets see, we can start with The Washington Times State Dept. concedes 'gaps' in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge - Washington Times

And how about The Washington Post of WATERGATE FAME Hillary Clinton’s e-mail issues have become a massive political problem

Seriously, Obamas state dept said today that Clinton Perjured herself, if 5 months of e-mails are missing. This is being compared to Nixons missing 18 minutes of tape. Clinton is done, flip her and get her off the grill now.

You got a link to the state department accusing her of perjury,or did you just pull that out of your butt?

 

[Bassman007]

Let me guess, you know this because you have "friends" involved in super-secret government stuff.[/QUOTE]

No need, the freedom of information act is in play here, and EVERYTHING that is not directly of National Security will be made public. Are you living in a cave or something? Bye the way Hillary did not disclose all of her e-mails as there is now a proven 5 month gap, that the OBAMA STATE DEPT. SAYS WILL MEAN A PERJURY CHARGE IF NOT FILLED.............................

Hillary is over, so start talking Biden, or Sanderewski or whatever his name is.

So lets rejoice O Lord.............[/QUOTE]



You put way too much faith in Judicial Watch.

The fact that they've never been right about anything before should have given you a little hint.

Where are you getting this information about "Benghazi" turning into the "biggest spy investigation of all time"?[/QUOTE]

Well lets see, we can start with The Washington Times State Dept. concedes 'gaps' in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge - Washington Times

And how about The Washington Post of WATERGATE FAME Hillary Clinton’s e-mail issues have become a massive political problem

Seriously, Obamas state dept said today that Clinton Perjured herself, if 5 months of e-mails are missing. This is being compared to Nixons missing 18 minutes of tape. Clinton is done, flip her and get her off the grill now.[/QUOTE]


You got a link to the state department accusing her of perjury,or did you just pull that out of your butt?[/QUOTE]

The Washington Times State Dept. concedes ‘gaps’ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge