Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,210
Yawning
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's some brilliant "logic" right there.
The State Department has already stated that there is no "gap" in Hillary's email history. Why would Hillary bother to "demand retractions" from hysterical right-wing nonsense sources? It would do nothing but give the Moonie Times and all the other nonsense blog sites legitimacy that they don't deserve. The smartest thing that Hillary could do is ignore them, not publicly denounce them.
Wrong the State Dept. concedes âgapsâ in Clinton email record; could result in perjury charge
State Dept. concedes âgapsâ in Clinton email record; contradiction could result in perjury charge
The State Dept said yesterday that she could delete personal e-mails, this is new, please keep up son.
Yawn, you are really silly.
If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.
From your link:
Mrs. Clintonâs presidential campaign didnât respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clintonâs last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
âWe are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,â the department said. âThere is no âgapâ in Secretary Clintonâs sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her âsentâ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.â
Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.
The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained âgaps,â according to internal department messages evaluating her production.
Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.
Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account sheâd used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.
The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 â a month before she left office.
Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clintonâs messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as âgaps.â
Mrs. Clintonâs presidential campaign didnât respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clintonâs last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
âWe are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,â the department said. âThere is no âgapâ in Secretary Clintonâs sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her âsentâ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.â
Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clintonâs assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.
âThe Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,â said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. âI suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.â
The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over â 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.
One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clintonâs personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the departmentâs early thoughts about the documents.
The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents
As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.
No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.
So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.
Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.
If you're going to post links, the least you should do is read the damn article, rather than just the headline.
From your link:
Mrs. Clintonâs presidential campaign didnât respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clintonâs last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
âWe are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,â the department said. âThere is no âgapâ in Secretary Clintonâs sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her âsentâ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.â
Here is the entire article, and if the first few months are missing as you pointed out, there is a gap. So get over it already, and when international hackers produce more than they already have, and if they are not all included in what was presented. Se ya silly.
The emails former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned back over to the government last year contained âgaps,â according to internal department messages evaluating her production.
Mrs. Clinton took office on Jan. 21, 2009, but the first message she turned back over to the department was dated March 18, and the earliest-dated message she herself sent was on April 13, or nearly three months into her time in office, according to a message obtained through an open-records request by Judicial Watch, which released it Monday.
Mrs. Clinton has said she continued using a previous account sheâd used during her time as a senator for business at the beginning of her time as secretary, but the differing dates between the first email received and the first sent raises still more questions.
The last recorded message she turned over was dated Feb. 1, 2013, and was one she received from top aide Cheryl Mills. But the last message Mrs. Clinton herself sent and turned over was dated Dec. 30, 2012 â a month before she left office.
Eric F. Stein, the State Department official who wrote the evaluation of Mrs. Clintonâs messages, described the missing times at the beginning of her term as âgaps.â
Mrs. Clintonâs presidential campaign didnât respond to a request for comment, but the State Department, in a statement, said it has gone back and found emails from Mrs. Clintonâs last days in office, so the department no longer believes there is a gap.
âWe are not aware of any gaps in the Clinton email set, with the exception of the first few months of her tenure when Sec. Clinton used a different email account that she advised she no longer has access to,â the department said. âThere is no âgapâ in Secretary Clintonâs sent messages from the December 2012 through the end of January 2013. Upon review, the department has many messages sent by Secretary Clinton during that period, including messages that appear to have been produced directly from her âsentâ mailbox. Future document releases will include emails from this time period.â
Judicial Watch, a conservative public interest law firm that has filed 20 separate open-records lawsuits demanding release of emails from Mrs. Clinton or her aides, said the gaps could contradict Mrs. Clintonâs assertion, under penalty of perjury, when she said she returned all work-related emails that were on the server she kept at her New York home.
âThe Obama administration and Hillary Clinton have taken their cover-up of the email scandal too far,â said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. âI suspect that federal courts will want more information, under oath, about the issues raised in these incredible documents.â
The emails obtained by Judicial Watch give more details about the documents Mrs. Clinton turned over â 55,000 printed pages, divided into 12 boxes.
One March 23, 2015, letter to Mrs. Clintonâs personal lawyer, David E. Kendall, detailed the departmentâs early thoughts about the documents.
The State Department asked that any of the emails still in electronic format be preserved, warned that some of the documents could be deemed classified, and said Mrs. Clinton would need permission before releasing any of the documents
As I've already pointed out, pretty much everything in that article is pure nonsense coming straight from JW.
No charges of "perjury" are coming, no "cuffs" for Hillary, no "biggest spy investigation of all time". It's all just a fantasy.
So the FBI is investigating fantasy with an A-Team, and twenty judges are assigned to my fantasy.
Anyone who believes that is schizophrenic.
What is this "twenty judges" thing you keep mentioning?
What "twenty judges" have been "assigned" to Hillary's emails?
Actually this article says 17 judges, but this does not include the private lawsuits that have been filed, or whatever the FBI is doing. State Department Seeks Coordinating Judge in Clinton e-mail Cases So there are highly likely more than 17, or even 20
http://theweek.com/articles/576229/why-im-suing-state-department-over-hillary-clintons-email-scandal