Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Obama's behaviour doesn't need excusing! He only needs excusing for the fantasies in your wingnut head.
Prove that that happened first.
Have you not been paying attention for the past 36 hours?Prove that happened first.
Yes, I have. The memo says nothing new.
You like being lied to? Living in lies? 4 people died because of POLITICS...and yet NO ONE has been held to account for the senseless deaths when it could have been avoided. Go to the families of those killed and parrot your lies, and see what they tell you.
YOU won't survive their wrath.
Actually, there is no evidence that the people died because of politics.
There is evidence that the truth about the deaths may have been covered up because of politics.
EXACTLY like the Pat Tillman case.
And there is no evidence of the WH involved in a "cover up," which is what this is really about; hence a phony "scandal" and no articles of impeachment.
Obama's behaviour doesn't need excusing! He only needs excusing for the fantasies in your wingnut head.
Prove that that happened first.
Have you not been paying attention for the past 36 hours?Prove that happened first.
Yes, I have. The memo says nothing new.
YOU support the LIE and that makes YOU just as culpable. Your denial does not hold water. Obama needs to account...as do YOU.4 people died as a result of outrage over a YouTube video that denigrated Mohammed.You like being lied to? Living in lies? 4 people died because of POLITICS...and yet NO ONE has been held to account for the senseless deaths when it could have been avoided. Go to the families of those killed and parrot your lies, and see what they tell you.OK, I read it. It's basically the same as the OP.
What do you think it says that's so damaging?
YOU won't survive their wrath.
Can you prove that is not correct?
Have you not been paying attention for the past 36 hours?
Yes, I have. The memo says nothing new.
(chuckles)
No, you haven't. A) You're lying to me, and I hate people who lie to my face, and B) You're in a state of utter denial. That's what happens to starstruck liberals like you when the truth comes out. Don't insult my intelligence.
But you continue to ignore that the administration blamed the attacks performed by terrorists on the actions of an American Citizen who was exercising his right to free speech.
I don't recall ANY politician...much less the President of the United States who was willing to use one of our most sacred rights as the reason why people attacked Americans when, in fact, he was well aware that it was NOT the impetus.
Scooter Libby subverted the NYT. I find your outrage over Obama to be selective. But that's hardly news.
yet you continue to ignore the fact that the President of the United Sates told the world that it was an American exercising his right to free speech that was the cause of the attack on Benghazi....You know....the man who swore to uphold the constitution selfishly blamed our most sacred right as the reason why some radicals killed Americans.
"...suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."
Two things. One. OMFG, they prepped her for a TV appearance? Two. There were protest in several nations across the world over news of that video. I think more than 4 dozen people were killed in those protests. The talking points were accurate. The only thing the talking points got wrong was that there was no protest outside the consulate in Benghazi that the extremest, who attacked the place, used as cover or joined in prior to launching their attack.
The evidence is now out there. A complete White House cover up. Those are the facts. No amount of left wing spin or bullshit will change that.
"...suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."
Two things. One. OMFG, they prepped her for a TV appearance? Two. There were protest in several nations across the world over news of that video. I think more than 4 dozen people were killed in those protests. The talking points were accurate. The only thing the talking points got wrong was that there was no protest outside the consulate in Benghazi that the extremest, who attacked the place, used as cover or joined in prior to launching their attack.
Left wing nut jobs will lie even when they know everyone knows it is a lie, that is how stupid they are, look at the left wing idiots on here, they prove it all the time.Actually, there is no evidence that the people died because of politics.
There is evidence that the truth about the deaths may have been covered up because of politics.
EXACTLY like the Pat Tillman case.
And there is no evidence of the WH involved in a "cover up," which is what this is really about; hence a phony "scandal" and no articles of impeachment.
PHONY CHARGES of no cover-up
you expect left-wing nutjobs to admit they're wrong?
How about a YouTube video of Obama and Jarrett saying "OK, we need to cover up these facts on Benghazi so I can get re-elected"? Would that satisfy your desire for evidence? Or would you jsut claim they all do it?The evidence is now out there. A complete White House cover up. Those are the facts. No amount of left wing spin or bullshit will change that.
There is no evidence of a cover up.
(Miss lollipop is hot.)
How would you know? you are a libtard, you wouldn't know the truth if it hit you upside your fat head.The evidence is now out there. A complete White House cover up. Those are the facts. No amount of left wing spin or bullshit will change that.
There is no evidence of a cover up.
(Miss lollipop is hot.)
"...suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video."
Two things. One. OMFG, they prepped her for a TV appearance? Two. There were protest in several nations across the world over news of that video. I think more than 4 dozen people were killed in those protests. The talking points were accurate. The only thing the talking points got wrong was that there was no protest outside the consulate in Benghazi that the extremest, who attacked the place, used as cover or joined in prior to launching their attack.
The evidence is now out there. A complete White House cover up. Those are the facts. No amount of left wing spin or bullshit will change that.
There is no evidence of a cover up.
(Miss lollipop is hot.)
You like being lied to? Living in lies? 4 people died because of POLITICS...and yet NO ONE has been held to account for the senseless deaths when it could have been avoided. Go to the families of those killed and parrot your lies, and see what they tell you.
YOU won't survive their wrath.
Actually, there is no evidence that the people died because of politics.
There is evidence that the truth about the deaths may have been covered up because of politics.
EXACTLY like the Pat Tillman case.
And there is no evidence of the WH involved in a "cover up," which is what this is really about; hence a phony "scandal" and no articles of impeachment.
Gee.....I wonder why it took a legal challenge for that email to be released. The White House allowed congress to have hearings regarding HOW he talking points were developed....yet refused to release the one email that showed EXACTLY how they were developed.
