Show us the people who said they doidnt vote because he was there?
So you really don't have a problem with racism, or violent acts on another race, as long as it is the race you choose doing the violence?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show us the people who said they doidnt vote because he was there?
CaféAuLait;2487336 said:where is the tape of him yelling while in front of the polls?
He was demanding ID and claiming to be security while brandishing a weapon. If that had been a member of the KKK dressed in uniform it would rightly be called voter intimidation however it seems the rules are changed for some.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU]YouTube - "Security" patrols stationed at polling places in Philly[/ame]
So, the reactions of ONE woman means NO ONE is intimidated? Who called the police, then?He wasn't demanding id. The woman behind him does not appear intimidated.
You cannot convict someone of voter intimidation if no one is being intimidated.
Probably the Republican operative.So, the reactions of ONE woman means NO ONE is intimidated? Who called the police, then?He wasn't demanding id. The woman behind him does not appear intimidated.
You cannot convict someone of voter intimidation if no one is being intimidated.![]()
Probably the Republican operative.So, the reactions of ONE woman means NO ONE is intimidated? Who called the police, then?He wasn't demanding id. The woman behind him does not appear intimidated.
You cannot convict someone of voter intimidation if no one is being intimidated.![]()
He wasn't demanding id. The woman behind him does not appear intimidated.
You cannot convict someone of voter intimidation if no one is being intimidated.
And she looks completely untrheatened too, just like the "reporters" who are talking to him.
He did not threaten anyone no matter how much you wish the tape showed that.
He wasn't demanding id. The woman behind him does not appear intimidated.
You cannot convict someone of voter intimidation if no one is being intimidated.
Bartle Bull, a 2008 poll watcher and a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign stated in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.
"In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll,"..."In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi ... I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location."
EXCLUSIVE: Career lawyers overruled on voting case - Washington Times
Dave that's because everything is black and white for you. There's only one way, your way or the highway.
No...it's just a bunch of internet stupidity.Forgive me for being naïve, but isn't the poll watcher's JOB to WATCH for this kind of shenanigans? Maybe we should just get rid of them. If they are Republican of course.
I went out to dinner with a group of educated, accomplished women last night. They barely knew anything about this. Sad isn't it?
Forgive me for being naïve, but isn't the poll watcher's JOB to WATCH for this kind of shenanigans? Maybe we should just get rid of them. If they are Republican of course.
I went out to dinner with a group of educated, accomplished women last night. They barely knew anything about this. Sad isn't it?
No...it's just a bunch of internet stupidity.Forgive me for being naïve, but isn't the poll watcher's JOB to WATCH for this kind of shenanigans? Maybe we should just get rid of them. If they are Republican of course.
I went out to dinner with a group of educated, accomplished women last night. They barely knew anything about this. Sad isn't it?
Forgive me for being naïve, but isn't the poll watcher's JOB to WATCH for this kind of shenanigans? Maybe we should just get rid of them. If they are Republican of course.
I went out to dinner with a group of educated, accomplished women last night. They barely knew anything about this. Sad isn't it?
Maybe because it really isn't that big a deal like it's been blown up to be in the opinion-media?