healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,022
- 10,516
- 900
bush got us into a totally irrelevant, uncalled for attack on Iraq which wouldn't have been fine if it had been won.
You have to allow presidents their wars. They like to have at least one war: they are, after all, our modern kings (if short term, optimally) and all kings love their wars.
But they HAVE to win them!! Let them have their war and then they LOSE it?? Darn. That's just sorry. And Bush managed to lose TWO! And one of them mattered. I suppose bin Laden was in Pakistan ever since we lost at Tora Bora. We were making war on the wrong country all those years.
AGAIN you f..king liars!!!
Clinton started the pricess with The 1998 Liberation of Iraq authorized by Congress' Resolution of 2002 (Public law 107-243, 116 Stat. 1497-1502) "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq " "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling .
"It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime."
On December 16, 1998, President Bill Clinton mandated Operation Desert Fox, a major four-day bombing campaign on Iraqi targets.
In spite of that Saddam allowed In five years 576,000 children to starve BECAUSE SADDAM refused to certify WMD destruction!
Iraq Sanctions Kill Children U.N. Reports - NYTimes.com
AND before that you f...king idiot......... Does the 1991 CEASE FIRE have any meaning to you??
I guess you are so up Obama's butt you can't even think because of the gas you have absorbed!
GEEZ get a f...kin life!!!