Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Not really the issue in the trial, though. The prosecution is going to argue that, since Kyle was there illegally and possessing a weapon illegally, he does not have the right to claim self defense. And they are going to argue to his intent.
Not really the issue in the trial, though
Hmm, no, actually they do not. Maybe that explains your wealth of confusion thus far.Everyone has the right to self-defense.
And in doing so, they will lie to the jury.The prosecution is going to argue that, since Kyle was there illegally and possessing a weapon illegally, he does not have the right to claim self defense.
Hmm, no, actually they do not. Maybe that explains your wealth of confusion thus far.
Someone committing a crime often cannot claim self defense. Link: www.google.comWho doesn't have the right to self-defense?
Post a link.
Someone committing a crime often cannot claim self defense. Link: www.google.com
Not necessarily. For example, if it was decided by the jury that Zimmerman was committing a crime in confronting and assaulting Martin, his claim to self defense would have evaporated.That covers Trayvon, Huber and Grosskreutz.......
Not necessarily. For example, if it was decided by the jury that Zimmerman was committing a crime in confronting and assaulting Martin, his claim to self defense would have evaporated.
Oh look, a fuzzy picture when Grosskreutz was shot which doesn't actually show him pointing his gun at Rittenhouse.
Oh look, a fuzzy picture when Grosskreutz was shot which doesn't actually show him pointing his gun at Rittenhouse.
Good job.
So Nicolas Cruz could have reasonably argued self defense had he shot someone who pulled a gun on him to stop him from shooting students at Parkland?Self-defense isn't the issue?
The prosecution is going to argue that, since Kyle was there illegally and possessing a weapon illegally, he does not have the right to claim self defense.
Everyone has the right to self-defense.
Can't tell in that photo he was pointing it all. If that was the best you can do, and I can only assume that it was, then you failed to prove he ever pointed it at Rittenhouse.What is he pointing the gun at?
So Nicolas Cruz could have reasonably argued self defense had he shot someone who pulled a gun on him to stop him from shooting students at Parkland?
Can't tell in that photo he was pointing it all. If that was the best you can do, and I can only assume that it was, then you failed to prove he ever pointed it at Rittenhouse.
Still no evidence Grosskreutz pointed his gun at at Rittenhouse, which is what you claimed.Grosskreutz was running up behind Rittenhouse, with a pistol in his hand, to stop Rittenhouse from shooting his attackers, before Rittenhouse was attacked? Before Rittenhouse defended himself?
Try this, between 16-20 seconds. I slowed it down to 0.25 speed.
Not perfect. Maybe still not clear enough for you. He tried twice.
What do you think?If I'm at a store passing a counterfeit $20 and a customer starts stabbing me, am I allowed to legally claim self-defense if I fight back?
Nope, he tried nunce as he's not seen in that video pointing his gun at Rittenhouse.
What do you think?
