mdn2000
VIP Member
- Banned
- #41
You folks can "cut and paste" all you want, that does not make either sides point, the validity of Old Rocks sources are equal to any opponents source.
That said, I see each side do the same thing, copy a story, nothing more. Search the net until you find something, what catches your attention, the headline, the headline confirms your belief and with a cursory glance you have your proof, an article, nothing more.
When the post is more, when the post contains technical analysis its not your work, its someone elses, and you post a mere fragment of what the person who made the study allows you to see.
I see articles presented as fact, the article links to a study, click the link and find the study to be a summary of a study that is coming in the future, no facts presented just a chain of links to headlines, nothing more.
The studies I have seen posted, the technical, science stuff, it pure theory, not proven, not disproved, simple theory, stuff done on computer models, programs they write and modify as they study, the model goes to far in one direction, no problem change a number or two here or there, try another formula, throw out certain facts, ignore peculiar characteristics, read the actual study, if it the study is done by reputable scientists or researchers, than they definitely state this in the summary of the report or study. Old Rock posted a study in these threads that states exactly what I just summarized.
Dry Ice is CO2, a simple post intended to make one think and ponder, put a block of dry ice in a beer cooler and it will stay cold for days, the CO2 is not under any pressure, it just likes to be cold, if you dont open that cooler, if no CO2 escapes, it will be cold a long time, try it.
You could melt the block of dry ice with a torch, try it, it melts, it disappears, changes to a gas, but does not retain the intense heat of the torch, not a bit, CO2 runs from the heat.
I dont need to link to someones theory or study, all that means nothing, literally nothing.
These people so deep in their books and numbers are as far removed from reality as politicians, which coincidently have a symbiotic relationship.
Links and Quotes of others has proven not a thing.
No matter, the solution they propose is more insane than the admitted theories, make more CO2 burning fossil fuel, to make green energy, to make electricity, fossil fuel directly to electricity produces more electricity without the CO2 created by a "middle process".
Direct copies are better than a copy of a copy.
Go ahead post another link, I will take it to its logical conclusion and I can pick out where the author will admit the idea is still a theory and not a fact.
The only fact presented is mine, dry ice is pure CO2, not under pressure, too cold to touch, just freezing cold.
Riddle me this batman. How do you obtain dry ice? Do you go out and collect it from the atmosphere? Do you leap out into space and collect it from Titan and bring it back to Earth in your teleport machine? Or perhaps do you purchase it from a store? And how does that store obtain it? I see, the store buys it from a factory. And how does the factory get it?
Look it up then get back to us when you have learned something. See, I didn't provide you a link so you can find it for yourself.
Where does the factory get it, where all CO2 is found, the south pole where its cold.
So everything else I said stands as fact, thanks.